Cargando…
Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevaci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114 |
_version_ | 1783413872652189696 |
---|---|
author | Desjardins, Annick Herndon, James E. McSherry, Frances Ravelo, Arliene Lipp, Eric S. Healy, Patrick Peters, Katherine B. Sampson, John H. Randazzo, Dina Sommer, Nicolas Friedman, Allan H. Friedman, Henry S. |
author_facet | Desjardins, Annick Herndon, James E. McSherry, Frances Ravelo, Arliene Lipp, Eric S. Healy, Patrick Peters, Katherine B. Sampson, John H. Randazzo, Dina Sommer, Nicolas Friedman, Allan H. Friedman, Henry S. |
author_sort | Desjardins, Annick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan‐Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy‐four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5‐58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3‐13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9‐8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8‐∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6‐16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8‐12.5) in those who did (P = 0.0382, log‐rank), while median PFS values were 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.6‐9.7) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7‐6.6), respectively (P = 0.0243, log‐rank). Treatment failure occurred in 70 patients; 47 of whom received salvage therapy, and most frequently bevacizumab/carboplatin (7/47; 14.9%). Thirteen patients (18%) experienced a grade 3 AE of special interest for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real‐world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6482327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64823272019-05-02 Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice Desjardins, Annick Herndon, James E. McSherry, Frances Ravelo, Arliene Lipp, Eric S. Healy, Patrick Peters, Katherine B. Sampson, John H. Randazzo, Dina Sommer, Nicolas Friedman, Allan H. Friedman, Henry S. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan‐Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy‐four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5‐58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3‐13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9‐8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8‐∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6‐16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8‐12.5) in those who did (P = 0.0382, log‐rank), while median PFS values were 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.6‐9.7) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7‐6.6), respectively (P = 0.0243, log‐rank). Treatment failure occurred in 70 patients; 47 of whom received salvage therapy, and most frequently bevacizumab/carboplatin (7/47; 14.9%). Thirteen patients (18%) experienced a grade 3 AE of special interest for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real‐world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6482327/ /pubmed/31049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Desjardins, Annick Herndon, James E. McSherry, Frances Ravelo, Arliene Lipp, Eric S. Healy, Patrick Peters, Katherine B. Sampson, John H. Randazzo, Dina Sommer, Nicolas Friedman, Allan H. Friedman, Henry S. Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title | Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title_full | Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title_short | Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
title_sort | single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desjardinsannick singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT herndonjamese singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT mcsherryfrances singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT raveloarliene singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT lipperics singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT healypatrick singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT peterskatherineb singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT sampsonjohnh singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT randazzodina singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT sommernicolas singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT friedmanallanh singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice AT friedmanhenrys singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice |