Cargando…

Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevaci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desjardins, Annick, Herndon, James E., McSherry, Frances, Ravelo, Arliene, Lipp, Eric S., Healy, Patrick, Peters, Katherine B., Sampson, John H., Randazzo, Dina, Sommer, Nicolas, Friedman, Allan H., Friedman, Henry S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114
_version_ 1783413872652189696
author Desjardins, Annick
Herndon, James E.
McSherry, Frances
Ravelo, Arliene
Lipp, Eric S.
Healy, Patrick
Peters, Katherine B.
Sampson, John H.
Randazzo, Dina
Sommer, Nicolas
Friedman, Allan H.
Friedman, Henry S.
author_facet Desjardins, Annick
Herndon, James E.
McSherry, Frances
Ravelo, Arliene
Lipp, Eric S.
Healy, Patrick
Peters, Katherine B.
Sampson, John H.
Randazzo, Dina
Sommer, Nicolas
Friedman, Allan H.
Friedman, Henry S.
author_sort Desjardins, Annick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan‐Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy‐four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5‐58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3‐13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9‐8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8‐∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6‐16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8‐12.5) in those who did (P = 0.0382, log‐rank), while median PFS values were 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.6‐9.7) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7‐6.6), respectively (P = 0.0243, log‐rank). Treatment failure occurred in 70 patients; 47 of whom received salvage therapy, and most frequently bevacizumab/carboplatin (7/47; 14.9%). Thirteen patients (18%) experienced a grade 3 AE of special interest for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real‐world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6482327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64823272019-05-02 Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice Desjardins, Annick Herndon, James E. McSherry, Frances Ravelo, Arliene Lipp, Eric S. Healy, Patrick Peters, Katherine B. Sampson, John H. Randazzo, Dina Sommer, Nicolas Friedman, Allan H. Friedman, Henry S. Health Sci Rep Research Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real‐world setting. METHODS: Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan‐Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy‐four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5‐58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3‐13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9‐8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8‐∞). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6‐16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8‐12.5) in those who did (P = 0.0382, log‐rank), while median PFS values were 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.6‐9.7) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7‐6.6), respectively (P = 0.0243, log‐rank). Treatment failure occurred in 70 patients; 47 of whom received salvage therapy, and most frequently bevacizumab/carboplatin (7/47; 14.9%). Thirteen patients (18%) experienced a grade 3 AE of special interest for bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real‐world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6482327/ /pubmed/31049419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Desjardins, Annick
Herndon, James E.
McSherry, Frances
Ravelo, Arliene
Lipp, Eric S.
Healy, Patrick
Peters, Katherine B.
Sampson, John H.
Randazzo, Dina
Sommer, Nicolas
Friedman, Allan H.
Friedman, Henry S.
Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title_full Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title_fullStr Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title_short Single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
title_sort single‐institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.114
work_keys_str_mv AT desjardinsannick singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT herndonjamese singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT mcsherryfrances singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT raveloarliene singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT lipperics singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT healypatrick singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT peterskatherineb singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT sampsonjohnh singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT randazzodina singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT sommernicolas singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT friedmanallanh singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice
AT friedmanhenrys singleinstitutionretrospectivereviewofpatientswithrecurrentglioblastomatreatedwithbevacizumabinclinicalpractice