Cargando…

Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement

BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) in Thai patients who require warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify the optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet, Krittayaphong, Rungroj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1078-3
_version_ 1783413892430430208
author Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet
Krittayaphong, Rungroj
author_facet Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet
Krittayaphong, Rungroj
author_sort Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) in Thai patients who require warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify the optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement in Thai patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study design. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of mechanical mitral valve replacement patients who received warfarin therapy at Siriraj Hospital. INR range was classified into 6 groups (< 2, 2.0–2.4, 2.5–2.9, 3.0–3.4, 3.5–4.5, and > 4.5). The optimal INR level was defined as the level with the lowest incidence density of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included and followed over a period of 707.81 patient-years. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.53 ± 1.27 years. Eleven patients experienced 13 thromboembolic events (3.42 per 100 patient-years), and 12 patients experienced 18 total bleeding events (5.50 per 100 patient-years). Intracranial bleeding occurred in 3 patients (2.62 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient time spent within INR 2.5–3.4, INR < 2.5, and INR > 3.4 was 41.96, 54.04, and 4%, respectively. The overall event rate was lowest in the 2.0 to 3.4 INR range. Statistically significant differences were observed between INR 2.3 to 4 and < 2 (p < 0.001) and between INR 2.3 to 4 and > 3.4 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal INR level was within the range of 2.0 to 3.4 in our cohort of Thai mechanical mitral valve replacement patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6482495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64824952019-05-02 Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet Krittayaphong, Rungroj BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Data are scarce regarding the optimal international normalized ratio (INR) in Thai patients who require warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to identify the optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement in Thai patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study design. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of mechanical mitral valve replacement patients who received warfarin therapy at Siriraj Hospital. INR range was classified into 6 groups (< 2, 2.0–2.4, 2.5–2.9, 3.0–3.4, 3.5–4.5, and > 4.5). The optimal INR level was defined as the level with the lowest incidence density of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included and followed over a period of 707.81 patient-years. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.53 ± 1.27 years. Eleven patients experienced 13 thromboembolic events (3.42 per 100 patient-years), and 12 patients experienced 18 total bleeding events (5.50 per 100 patient-years). Intracranial bleeding occurred in 3 patients (2.62 per 100 patient-years). The percentage of patient time spent within INR 2.5–3.4, INR < 2.5, and INR > 3.4 was 41.96, 54.04, and 4%, respectively. The overall event rate was lowest in the 2.0 to 3.4 INR range. Statistically significant differences were observed between INR 2.3 to 4 and < 2 (p < 0.001) and between INR 2.3 to 4 and > 3.4 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The optimal INR level was within the range of 2.0 to 3.4 in our cohort of Thai mechanical mitral valve replacement patients. BioMed Central 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6482495/ /pubmed/31023235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1078-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamthornthanakarn, Itthidet
Krittayaphong, Rungroj
Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title_full Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title_fullStr Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title_full_unstemmed Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title_short Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
title_sort optimal inr level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1078-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kamthornthanakarnitthidet optimalinrlevelforwarfarintherapyaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacement
AT krittayaphongrungroj optimalinrlevelforwarfarintherapyaftermechanicalmitralvalvereplacement