Cargando…

Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research

BACKGROUND: Data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare such as health-related big data research (HBDR) implies that data from clinical routine, research and patient-reported data, but also non-medical social or demographic data, are aggregated and linked in order to optimize biomedical resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beier, Katharina, Schweda, Mark, Schicktanz, Silke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7
_version_ 1783413899698110464
author Beier, Katharina
Schweda, Mark
Schicktanz, Silke
author_facet Beier, Katharina
Schweda, Mark
Schicktanz, Silke
author_sort Beier, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare such as health-related big data research (HBDR) implies that data from clinical routine, research and patient-reported data, but also non-medical social or demographic data, are aggregated and linked in order to optimize biomedical research. In this context, notions of patient participation and involvement are frequently invoked to legitimize this kind of research and improve its governance. The aim of this debate paper is to critically examine the specific use and ethical role of participatory concepts in the context of HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare. DISCUSSION: We introduce basic conceptual distinctions for the understanding of participation by looking at relevant fields of application in politics, bioethics and medical research. Against this backdrop, we identify three paradigmatic participatory roles that patients/subjects are assigned within the field of HBDR: participants as providers of biomaterials and data, participants as administrators of their own research participation and participants as (co-)principal investigators. We further illustrate these roles by exemplary data-intensive research-initiatives. Our analysis of these initiatives and their respective participatory promises reveals specific ethical and practical shortcomings and challenges. Central problems affecting, amongst others, ethical and methodological research standards, as well as public trust in research, result from the negligence of essential political-ethical dimensions of genuine participation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the conceptual distinctions introduced, we formulate basic criteria for justified appeals to participatory approaches in HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare in order to overcome these shortcomings. As we suggest, this is not only a matter of conceptual clarity, but a crucial requirement for maintaining ethical standards and trust in HBDR and related medical research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6482526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64825262019-05-02 Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research Beier, Katharina Schweda, Mark Schicktanz, Silke BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Debate BACKGROUND: Data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare such as health-related big data research (HBDR) implies that data from clinical routine, research and patient-reported data, but also non-medical social or demographic data, are aggregated and linked in order to optimize biomedical research. In this context, notions of patient participation and involvement are frequently invoked to legitimize this kind of research and improve its governance. The aim of this debate paper is to critically examine the specific use and ethical role of participatory concepts in the context of HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare. DISCUSSION: We introduce basic conceptual distinctions for the understanding of participation by looking at relevant fields of application in politics, bioethics and medical research. Against this backdrop, we identify three paradigmatic participatory roles that patients/subjects are assigned within the field of HBDR: participants as providers of biomaterials and data, participants as administrators of their own research participation and participants as (co-)principal investigators. We further illustrate these roles by exemplary data-intensive research-initiatives. Our analysis of these initiatives and their respective participatory promises reveals specific ethical and practical shortcomings and challenges. Central problems affecting, amongst others, ethical and methodological research standards, as well as public trust in research, result from the negligence of essential political-ethical dimensions of genuine participation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the conceptual distinctions introduced, we formulate basic criteria for justified appeals to participatory approaches in HBDR and data-intensive research in medicine and healthcare in order to overcome these shortcomings. As we suggest, this is not only a matter of conceptual clarity, but a crucial requirement for maintaining ethical standards and trust in HBDR and related medical research. BioMed Central 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6482526/ /pubmed/31023321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Beier, Katharina
Schweda, Mark
Schicktanz, Silke
Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title_full Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title_fullStr Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title_full_unstemmed Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title_short Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
title_sort taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7
work_keys_str_mv AT beierkatharina takingpatientinvolvementseriouslyacriticalethicalanalysisofparticipatoryapproachesindataintensivemedicalresearch
AT schwedamark takingpatientinvolvementseriouslyacriticalethicalanalysisofparticipatoryapproachesindataintensivemedicalresearch
AT schicktanzsilke takingpatientinvolvementseriouslyacriticalethicalanalysisofparticipatoryapproachesindataintensivemedicalresearch