Cargando…

Retrospective study on the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in men with intraductal carcinoma of prostate

BACKGROUND: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is an independent biomarker of recurrence and survival with particular treatment response, yet no study has tested its response to radiotherapy. The aim of our project was to test the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) in patients with loc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trinh, Vincent Q., Benzerdjeb, Nazim, Chagnon-Monarque, Ségolène, Dionne, Nicolas, Delouya, Guila, Kougioumoutzakis, André, Sirois, Jennifer, Albadine, Roula, Latour, Mathieu, Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie, Hovington, Hélène, Bergeron, Alain, Zorn, Kevin C., Fradet, Yves, Saad, Fred, Taussky, Daniel, Trudel, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31018850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1267-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is an independent biomarker of recurrence and survival with particular treatment response, yet no study has tested its response to radiotherapy. The aim of our project was to test the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) in patients with localized to locally advanced prostate cancer (PC) and IDC-P. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of men with pT2-T3 PC treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without ART, from two centres (1993–2015). Exclusion criteria were the use of another type of treatment prior to biochemical recurrence (BCR), and detectable prostate- specific antigen (PSA) following RP or ART. Primary outcome was BCR (2 consecutive PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml). Patients were grouped by treatment (RP(only)/RP + ART), IDC-P status, and presence of high-risk features (HRF: Grade Groups 4–5, positive margins, pT3 stage). RESULTS: We reviewed 293 RP specimens (median follow-up 99 months, 69 BCR). Forty-eight patients (16.4%) were treated by RP + ART. Multivariate Cox regression for BCR indicated that IDC-P had the strongest impact (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.44–3.97), while ART reduced the risk of BCR (HR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.17–0.85). Other HRF were all significant except for pT3b stage. IDC-P[+] patients who did not receive ART had the worst BCR-free survival (log-rank P = 0.023). Furthermore, IDC-P had the same impact on BCR-free survival as ≥1 HRF (log-rank P = 0.955). CONCLUSION: Men with IDC-P who did not receive ART had the highest BCR rates, and IDC-P had the same impact as ≥1 HRF, which are often used as ART indications. Once validated, ART should be considered in patients with IDC-P. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1267-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.