Cargando…

Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?

The use of pre- and post-milking teat disinfectants can reduce teat bacterial load and aid in the collection of high-quality milk. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction in bacteria populations on teat skin after the application of different commercial teat disinfectant products. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose, Garvey, Mary, Flynn, Jim, Jordan, Kieran, Gleeson, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0455-3
_version_ 1783413908433797120
author Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose
Garvey, Mary
Flynn, Jim
Jordan, Kieran
Gleeson, David
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose
Garvey, Mary
Flynn, Jim
Jordan, Kieran
Gleeson, David
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose
collection PubMed
description The use of pre- and post-milking teat disinfectants can reduce teat bacterial load and aid in the collection of high-quality milk. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction in bacteria populations on teat skin after the application of different commercial teat disinfectant products. Ten teat disinfectant products were applied to the teats of 10 Holstein–Friesian cows. One cow received one teat disinfectant product at each sampling point before cluster application for milking. A composite swab sample was taken of the 4 teats of each cow before and after teat disinfectant application. Swab samples were placed on three different selective agars to enumerate bacterial counts of staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliforms isolates on teat skin. Staphylococcal isolates were the most prominent bacterial group recovered on teat swabs (49%), followed by streptococcal (36%) and coliform (15%) isolates before the application of disinfectant. The average bacterial reductions on teat skin were shown to be 76%, 73% and 60% for staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliform isolates, respectively. All of the teat disinfectant products tested reduced teat bacterial load for all three bacterial groups. Product 4 containing 0.6% w/w diamine was the most effective against bacterial populations of staphylococcal and streptococcal isolates on teat skin with a reduction of 90% and 94%, respectively. Whereas product 10, which contained 0.5% w/w iodine, resulted in the highest reduction in coliforms on teat skin with a reduction of 91%. Results from this study suggest that specific bacterial population loads on teats can be reduced using different teat disinfectant formulations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6482563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64825632019-05-02 Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others? Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose Garvey, Mary Flynn, Jim Jordan, Kieran Gleeson, David Acta Vet Scand Brief Communication The use of pre- and post-milking teat disinfectants can reduce teat bacterial load and aid in the collection of high-quality milk. The objective of this study was to compare the reduction in bacteria populations on teat skin after the application of different commercial teat disinfectant products. Ten teat disinfectant products were applied to the teats of 10 Holstein–Friesian cows. One cow received one teat disinfectant product at each sampling point before cluster application for milking. A composite swab sample was taken of the 4 teats of each cow before and after teat disinfectant application. Swab samples were placed on three different selective agars to enumerate bacterial counts of staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliforms isolates on teat skin. Staphylococcal isolates were the most prominent bacterial group recovered on teat swabs (49%), followed by streptococcal (36%) and coliform (15%) isolates before the application of disinfectant. The average bacterial reductions on teat skin were shown to be 76%, 73% and 60% for staphylococcal, streptococcal and coliform isolates, respectively. All of the teat disinfectant products tested reduced teat bacterial load for all three bacterial groups. Product 4 containing 0.6% w/w diamine was the most effective against bacterial populations of staphylococcal and streptococcal isolates on teat skin with a reduction of 90% and 94%, respectively. Whereas product 10, which contained 0.5% w/w iodine, resulted in the highest reduction in coliforms on teat skin with a reduction of 91%. Results from this study suggest that specific bacterial population loads on teats can be reduced using different teat disinfectant formulations. BioMed Central 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6482563/ /pubmed/31023344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0455-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Fitzpatrick, Sarah Rose
Garvey, Mary
Flynn, Jim
Jordan, Kieran
Gleeson, David
Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title_full Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title_fullStr Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title_full_unstemmed Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title_short Are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
title_sort are some teat disinfectant formulations more effective against specific bacteria isolated on teat skin than others?
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31023344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0455-3
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatricksarahrose aresometeatdisinfectantformulationsmoreeffectiveagainstspecificbacteriaisolatedonteatskinthanothers
AT garveymary aresometeatdisinfectantformulationsmoreeffectiveagainstspecificbacteriaisolatedonteatskinthanothers
AT flynnjim aresometeatdisinfectantformulationsmoreeffectiveagainstspecificbacteriaisolatedonteatskinthanothers
AT jordankieran aresometeatdisinfectantformulationsmoreeffectiveagainstspecificbacteriaisolatedonteatskinthanothers
AT gleesondavid aresometeatdisinfectantformulationsmoreeffectiveagainstspecificbacteriaisolatedonteatskinthanothers