Cargando…

Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining

The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Holmes, David R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263
_version_ 1782120149275377664
author Holmes, David R
author_facet Holmes, David R
author_sort Holmes, David R
collection PubMed
description The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, should be used unless contraindicated. Surgical therapy has also changed with the introduction of minimally invasive, beating heart surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention has perhaps changed the most radically with adjunctive therapy – glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines, and reliance on stent implantation. The future, with new distal protection devices and drug-coated stents, should continue to see increased numbers of patients who can benefit from percutaneous intervention.
format Text
id pubmed-64826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-648262002-01-25 Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining Holmes, David R Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, should be used unless contraindicated. Surgical therapy has also changed with the introduction of minimally invasive, beating heart surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention has perhaps changed the most radically with adjunctive therapy – glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines, and reliance on stent implantation. The future, with new distal protection devices and drug-coated stents, should continue to see increased numbers of patients who can benefit from percutaneous intervention. BioMed Central 2001 2001-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC64826/ /pubmed/11806810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Holmes, David R
Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title_full Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title_fullStr Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title_full_unstemmed Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title_short Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
title_sort debate: pci vs cabg: a moving target, but we are gaining
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263
work_keys_str_mv AT holmesdavidr debatepcivscabgamovingtargetbutwearegaining