Cargando…
Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining
The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angio...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263 |
_version_ | 1782120149275377664 |
---|---|
author | Holmes, David R |
author_facet | Holmes, David R |
author_sort | Holmes, David R |
collection | PubMed |
description | The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, should be used unless contraindicated. Surgical therapy has also changed with the introduction of minimally invasive, beating heart surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention has perhaps changed the most radically with adjunctive therapy – glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines, and reliance on stent implantation. The future, with new distal protection devices and drug-coated stents, should continue to see increased numbers of patients who can benefit from percutaneous intervention. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-64826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-648262002-01-25 Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining Holmes, David R Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The treatment of patients with coronary artery disease continues to evolve; all three strategies – medical therapy, surgical revascularization, and percutaneous coronary intervention – have changed. Medical therapy with intense risk-factor modification and treatment with a statin, aspirin, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, should be used unless contraindicated. Surgical therapy has also changed with the introduction of minimally invasive, beating heart surgery. Percutaneous coronary intervention has perhaps changed the most radically with adjunctive therapy – glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, thienopyridines, and reliance on stent implantation. The future, with new distal protection devices and drug-coated stents, should continue to see increased numbers of patients who can benefit from percutaneous intervention. BioMed Central 2001 2001-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC64826/ /pubmed/11806810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Holmes, David R Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title | Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title_full | Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title_fullStr | Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title_short | Debate: PCI vs CABG: a moving target, but we are gaining |
title_sort | debate: pci vs cabg: a moving target, but we are gaining |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holmesdavidr debatepcivscabgamovingtargetbutwearegaining |