Cargando…
Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative fluid collection due to pancreatic leak is the most frequent complication after pancreatic surgery. EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection is the gold standard procedure; however, data on outcomes of this procedure are limited. The pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29600794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_112_17 |
_version_ | 1783413918232739840 |
---|---|
author | Caillol, Fabrice Godat, Sebastien Turrini, Olivier Zemmour, Christophe Bories, Erwan Pesenti, Christian Ratone, Jean Phillippe Ewald, Jacques Delpero, Jean Robert Giovannini, Marc |
author_facet | Caillol, Fabrice Godat, Sebastien Turrini, Olivier Zemmour, Christophe Bories, Erwan Pesenti, Christian Ratone, Jean Phillippe Ewald, Jacques Delpero, Jean Robert Giovannini, Marc |
author_sort | Caillol, Fabrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative fluid collection due to pancreatic leak is the most frequent complication after pancreatic surgery. EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection is the gold standard procedure; however, data on outcomes of this procedure are limited. The primary endpoint of our study was relapse over longterm followup, and the secondary endpoint was the efficiency and safety of EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center from December 2008 to April 2016. Global morbidity was defined as the occurrence of an event involving additional endoscopic procedures, hospitalization, or interventional radiologic or surgical procedures. EUS-guided drainage was considered a clinical failure if surgery was required to treat a relapse after stent removal. RESULTS: Fortyone patients were included. The technical success rate was 100%. Drainage was considered a clinical success in 93% (39/41) of cases. Additionally, 19 (46%) complications were identified as global morbidity. The duration between surgery and EUS-guided drainage was not a significantly related factor for morbidity rate (P = 0.8); however, bleeding due to arterial injuries (splenic artery and gastroduodenal artery) from salvage drainage procedures occurred within 25 days following the initial surgery. There was no difference in survival between patients with and without complications. No relapse was reported during the followup (median: 44.75 months; range: 29.24 to 65.74 months). CONCLUSION: EUSguided drainage for post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection was efficient with no relapse during longterm followup. Morbidity rate was independent of the duration between the initial surgery and EUS-guided drainage; however, bleeding risk was likely more important in cases of early drainage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6482606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64826062019-04-30 Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up Caillol, Fabrice Godat, Sebastien Turrini, Olivier Zemmour, Christophe Bories, Erwan Pesenti, Christian Ratone, Jean Phillippe Ewald, Jacques Delpero, Jean Robert Giovannini, Marc Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Postoperative fluid collection due to pancreatic leak is the most frequent complication after pancreatic surgery. EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection is the gold standard procedure; however, data on outcomes of this procedure are limited. The primary endpoint of our study was relapse over longterm followup, and the secondary endpoint was the efficiency and safety of EUS-guided drainage of post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a single center from December 2008 to April 2016. Global morbidity was defined as the occurrence of an event involving additional endoscopic procedures, hospitalization, or interventional radiologic or surgical procedures. EUS-guided drainage was considered a clinical failure if surgery was required to treat a relapse after stent removal. RESULTS: Fortyone patients were included. The technical success rate was 100%. Drainage was considered a clinical success in 93% (39/41) of cases. Additionally, 19 (46%) complications were identified as global morbidity. The duration between surgery and EUS-guided drainage was not a significantly related factor for morbidity rate (P = 0.8); however, bleeding due to arterial injuries (splenic artery and gastroduodenal artery) from salvage drainage procedures occurred within 25 days following the initial surgery. There was no difference in survival between patients with and without complications. No relapse was reported during the followup (median: 44.75 months; range: 29.24 to 65.74 months). CONCLUSION: EUSguided drainage for post-pancreatic surgery fluid collection was efficient with no relapse during longterm followup. Morbidity rate was independent of the duration between the initial surgery and EUS-guided drainage; however, bleeding risk was likely more important in cases of early drainage. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6482606/ /pubmed/29600794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_112_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Caillol, Fabrice Godat, Sebastien Turrini, Olivier Zemmour, Christophe Bories, Erwan Pesenti, Christian Ratone, Jean Phillippe Ewald, Jacques Delpero, Jean Robert Giovannini, Marc Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title | Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title_full | Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title_fullStr | Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title_full_unstemmed | Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title_short | Fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: EUS drainage and long-term follow-up |
title_sort | fluid collection after partial pancreatectomy: eus drainage and long-term follow-up |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29600794 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_112_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caillolfabrice fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT godatsebastien fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT turriniolivier fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT zemmourchristophe fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT borieserwan fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT pesentichristian fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT ratonejeanphillippe fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT ewaldjacques fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT delperojeanrobert fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup AT giovanninimarc fluidcollectionafterpartialpancreatectomyeusdrainageandlongtermfollowup |