Cargando…
Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a questionnaire (consisting of 10 items/questions) to identify hearing loss (HL) among three-wheeler tempo and noncommercial car drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in an urban area of Lucknow city. Three-wheeler tempo drive...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31041273 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_108_19 |
_version_ | 1783413956443897856 |
---|---|
author | Manar, Manish K. Shukla, Sheo Prasad Mohan, Uday Singh, Shivendra Kumar Verma, Veerendra |
author_facet | Manar, Manish K. Shukla, Sheo Prasad Mohan, Uday Singh, Shivendra Kumar Verma, Veerendra |
author_sort | Manar, Manish K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a questionnaire (consisting of 10 items/questions) to identify hearing loss (HL) among three-wheeler tempo and noncommercial car drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in an urban area of Lucknow city. Three-wheeler tempo drivers and noncommercial car drivers were assessed for HL by audiometry. A total of 300 subjects, who fulfilled the study criteria, were selected for the interview and health assessment. The pure tone audiometry was conducted after >12 hours of the last noise exposure to avoid temporary threshold shift. RESULTS: The percentage of respondents aged between 31 and 40 years was 36%. The highest affirmative response item was “Do you have trouble hearing in noisy background?” constituting 68% and the lowest affirmative response item was “Do you have trouble understanding the speech of women and children?” constituting 33.7%. Kappa values showed that there was significantly (<0.05) mild agreement between most of the items and the gold standard for mid and high-frequency HL. The area under the curve for low, mid, and high frequency HL was 0.76% (95% CI = 0.68–0.84), 0.69 (95% CI = 0.73–0.75), and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.62–0.73), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were reasonable for all the definition of HL at different cutoff scores. CONCLUSION: A self-reported questionnaire-based approach may be used for the assessment of HL especially when audiometry is not feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6482795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64827952019-04-30 Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers Manar, Manish K. Shukla, Sheo Prasad Mohan, Uday Singh, Shivendra Kumar Verma, Veerendra J Family Med Prim Care Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of a questionnaire (consisting of 10 items/questions) to identify hearing loss (HL) among three-wheeler tempo and noncommercial car drivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in an urban area of Lucknow city. Three-wheeler tempo drivers and noncommercial car drivers were assessed for HL by audiometry. A total of 300 subjects, who fulfilled the study criteria, were selected for the interview and health assessment. The pure tone audiometry was conducted after >12 hours of the last noise exposure to avoid temporary threshold shift. RESULTS: The percentage of respondents aged between 31 and 40 years was 36%. The highest affirmative response item was “Do you have trouble hearing in noisy background?” constituting 68% and the lowest affirmative response item was “Do you have trouble understanding the speech of women and children?” constituting 33.7%. Kappa values showed that there was significantly (<0.05) mild agreement between most of the items and the gold standard for mid and high-frequency HL. The area under the curve for low, mid, and high frequency HL was 0.76% (95% CI = 0.68–0.84), 0.69 (95% CI = 0.73–0.75), and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.62–0.73), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were reasonable for all the definition of HL at different cutoff scores. CONCLUSION: A self-reported questionnaire-based approach may be used for the assessment of HL especially when audiometry is not feasible. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6482795/ /pubmed/31041273 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_108_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Manar, Manish K. Shukla, Sheo Prasad Mohan, Uday Singh, Shivendra Kumar Verma, Veerendra Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title | Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title_full | Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title_fullStr | Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title_short | Validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
title_sort | validation of a questionnaire to identify noise-induced hearing loss among drivers |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6482795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31041273 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_108_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manarmanishk validationofaquestionnairetoidentifynoiseinducedhearinglossamongdrivers AT shuklasheoprasad validationofaquestionnairetoidentifynoiseinducedhearinglossamongdrivers AT mohanuday validationofaquestionnairetoidentifynoiseinducedhearinglossamongdrivers AT singhshivendrakumar validationofaquestionnairetoidentifynoiseinducedhearinglossamongdrivers AT vermaveerendra validationofaquestionnairetoidentifynoiseinducedhearinglossamongdrivers |