Cargando…

Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling

INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest the urinary tract hosts a microbial community of varying composition, even in the absence of infection. Culture-independent methodologies, such as next-generation sequencing of conserved ribosomal DNA sequences, provide an expansive look at these communities, identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ackerman, A. Lenore, Anger, Jennifer Tash, Khalique, Muhammad Umair, Ackerman, James E., Tang, Jie, Kim, Jayoung, Underhill, David M., Freeman, Michael R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210306
_version_ 1783413988460068864
author Ackerman, A. Lenore
Anger, Jennifer Tash
Khalique, Muhammad Umair
Ackerman, James E.
Tang, Jie
Kim, Jayoung
Underhill, David M.
Freeman, Michael R.
author_facet Ackerman, A. Lenore
Anger, Jennifer Tash
Khalique, Muhammad Umair
Ackerman, James E.
Tang, Jie
Kim, Jayoung
Underhill, David M.
Freeman, Michael R.
author_sort Ackerman, A. Lenore
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest the urinary tract hosts a microbial community of varying composition, even in the absence of infection. Culture-independent methodologies, such as next-generation sequencing of conserved ribosomal DNA sequences, provide an expansive look at these communities, identifying both common commensals and fastidious organisms. A fundamental challenge has been the isolation of DNA representative of the entire resident microbial community, including fungi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated multiple modifications of commonly-used DNA extraction procedures using standardized male and female urine samples, comparing resulting overall, fungal and bacterial DNA yields by quantitative PCR. After identifying protocol modifications that increased DNA yields (lyticase/lysozyme digestion, bead beating, boil/freeze cycles, proteinase K treatment, and carrier DNA use), all modifications were combined for systematic confirmation of optimal protocol conditions. This optimized protocol was tested against commercially available methodologies to compare overall and microbial DNA yields, community representation and diversity by next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Overall and fungal-specific DNA yields from standardized urine samples demonstrated that microbial abundances differed significantly among the eight methods used. Methodologies that included multiple disruption steps, including enzymatic, mechanical, and thermal disruption and proteinase digestion, particularly in combination with small volume processing and pooling steps, provided more comprehensive representation of the range of bacterial and fungal species. Concentration of larger volume urine specimens at low speed centrifugation proved highly effective, increasing resulting DNA levels and providing greater microbial representation and diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in the methodology of urine storage, preparation, and DNA processing improve microbial community profiling using culture-independent sequencing methods. Our optimized protocol for DNA extraction from urine samples provided improved fungal community representation. Use of this technique resulted in equivalent representation of the bacterial populations as well, making this a useful technique for the concurrent evaluation of bacterial and fungal populations by NGS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6483181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64831812019-05-09 Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling Ackerman, A. Lenore Anger, Jennifer Tash Khalique, Muhammad Umair Ackerman, James E. Tang, Jie Kim, Jayoung Underhill, David M. Freeman, Michael R. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Recent data suggest the urinary tract hosts a microbial community of varying composition, even in the absence of infection. Culture-independent methodologies, such as next-generation sequencing of conserved ribosomal DNA sequences, provide an expansive look at these communities, identifying both common commensals and fastidious organisms. A fundamental challenge has been the isolation of DNA representative of the entire resident microbial community, including fungi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated multiple modifications of commonly-used DNA extraction procedures using standardized male and female urine samples, comparing resulting overall, fungal and bacterial DNA yields by quantitative PCR. After identifying protocol modifications that increased DNA yields (lyticase/lysozyme digestion, bead beating, boil/freeze cycles, proteinase K treatment, and carrier DNA use), all modifications were combined for systematic confirmation of optimal protocol conditions. This optimized protocol was tested against commercially available methodologies to compare overall and microbial DNA yields, community representation and diversity by next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Overall and fungal-specific DNA yields from standardized urine samples demonstrated that microbial abundances differed significantly among the eight methods used. Methodologies that included multiple disruption steps, including enzymatic, mechanical, and thermal disruption and proteinase digestion, particularly in combination with small volume processing and pooling steps, provided more comprehensive representation of the range of bacterial and fungal species. Concentration of larger volume urine specimens at low speed centrifugation proved highly effective, increasing resulting DNA levels and providing greater microbial representation and diversity. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in the methodology of urine storage, preparation, and DNA processing improve microbial community profiling using culture-independent sequencing methods. Our optimized protocol for DNA extraction from urine samples provided improved fungal community representation. Use of this technique resulted in equivalent representation of the bacterial populations as well, making this a useful technique for the concurrent evaluation of bacterial and fungal populations by NGS. Public Library of Science 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6483181/ /pubmed/31022216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210306 Text en © 2019 Ackerman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ackerman, A. Lenore
Anger, Jennifer Tash
Khalique, Muhammad Umair
Ackerman, James E.
Tang, Jie
Kim, Jayoung
Underhill, David M.
Freeman, Michael R.
Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title_full Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title_fullStr Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title_short Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
title_sort optimization of dna extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210306
work_keys_str_mv AT ackermanalenore optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT angerjennifertash optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT khaliquemuhammadumair optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT ackermanjamese optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT tangjie optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT kimjayoung optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT underhilldavidm optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT freemanmichaelr optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling
AT optimizationofdnaextractionfromhumanurinarysamplesformycobiomecommunityprofiling