Cargando…
Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were exten...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091 |
_version_ | 1783414001219141632 |
---|---|
author | Rossi, Rodolfo Santos Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira Guerra, Simony Trevisan Latosinski, Giulia Soares Rossi, Bruna Fernanda Rall, Vera Lucia Mores Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo |
author_facet | Rossi, Rodolfo Santos Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira Guerra, Simony Trevisan Latosinski, Giulia Soares Rossi, Bruna Fernanda Rall, Vera Lucia Mores Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo |
author_sort | Rossi, Rodolfo Santos |
collection | PubMed |
description | A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were extended to assess whether CLOXIMM was not inferior to CEFIMM (Trial 2). Nine farms were included in the study. Milk samples were collected from all quarters of all lactating cows for microbiological identification of S. agalactiae. Positive cows were randomly allocated into four groups: CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, or negative control (CONTROL). Study outcomes were bacteriological cure at 14 (CURE14), 21 (CURE21), and 14 and 21 (CURE1421) days after treatment onset, and somatic cell count. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of cure between each treatment and CONTROL. Non-inferiority analysis was performed considering a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) and non-inferiority margins (Δ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. Adjusted S. agalactiae bacteriological cure for CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, and CONTROL was 86, 98, 55, and 25% at day 14; 82, 93, 52, and 0% at day 21; and 82, 92, 40, and 0% at days 14 and 21, respectively. Treatment with CLOXIMM and CEFIMM resulted in greater bacteriological cure rates, as compared with CEFIM or CONTROL, which does not justify the use of CEFIM in S. agalactiae eradication programs. The CURE14 difference between CEFIMM and CLOXIMM was of 12.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.056–0.184). CLOXIMM was considered not inferior to CEFIMM for Δ = 0.20 or 0.25 and inconclusive for Δ = 0.10 or 0.15. Thus, it should be pondered by veterinarians whether an expected 12.1 (5.6–18.4) percentage points increase in cure rate would justify the use of a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as opposed to a combination of traditional IMM drugs (cloxacillin and ampicillin) to treat S. agalactiae subclinical mastitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6483254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64832542019-05-09 Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis Rossi, Rodolfo Santos Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira Guerra, Simony Trevisan Latosinski, Giulia Soares Rossi, Bruna Fernanda Rall, Vera Lucia Mores Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo PLoS One Research Article A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were extended to assess whether CLOXIMM was not inferior to CEFIMM (Trial 2). Nine farms were included in the study. Milk samples were collected from all quarters of all lactating cows for microbiological identification of S. agalactiae. Positive cows were randomly allocated into four groups: CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, or negative control (CONTROL). Study outcomes were bacteriological cure at 14 (CURE14), 21 (CURE21), and 14 and 21 (CURE1421) days after treatment onset, and somatic cell count. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of cure between each treatment and CONTROL. Non-inferiority analysis was performed considering a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) and non-inferiority margins (Δ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. Adjusted S. agalactiae bacteriological cure for CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, and CONTROL was 86, 98, 55, and 25% at day 14; 82, 93, 52, and 0% at day 21; and 82, 92, 40, and 0% at days 14 and 21, respectively. Treatment with CLOXIMM and CEFIMM resulted in greater bacteriological cure rates, as compared with CEFIM or CONTROL, which does not justify the use of CEFIM in S. agalactiae eradication programs. The CURE14 difference between CEFIMM and CLOXIMM was of 12.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.056–0.184). CLOXIMM was considered not inferior to CEFIMM for Δ = 0.20 or 0.25 and inconclusive for Δ = 0.10 or 0.15. Thus, it should be pondered by veterinarians whether an expected 12.1 (5.6–18.4) percentage points increase in cure rate would justify the use of a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as opposed to a combination of traditional IMM drugs (cloxacillin and ampicillin) to treat S. agalactiae subclinical mastitis. Public Library of Science 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6483254/ /pubmed/31022270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091 Text en © 2019 Rossi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rossi, Rodolfo Santos Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira Guerra, Simony Trevisan Latosinski, Giulia Soares Rossi, Bruna Fernanda Rall, Vera Lucia Mores Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title | Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title_full | Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title_short | Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
title_sort | efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossirodolfosantos efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT amaranteariadneferreira efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT guerrasimonytrevisan efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT latosinskigiuliasoares efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT rossibrunafernanda efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT rallveraluciamores efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis AT pantojajosecarlosdefigueiredo efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis |