Cargando…

Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis

A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossi, Rodolfo Santos, Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira, Guerra, Simony Trevisan, Latosinski, Giulia Soares, Rossi, Bruna Fernanda, Rall, Vera Lucia Mores, Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091
_version_ 1783414001219141632
author Rossi, Rodolfo Santos
Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira
Guerra, Simony Trevisan
Latosinski, Giulia Soares
Rossi, Bruna Fernanda
Rall, Vera Lucia Mores
Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo
author_facet Rossi, Rodolfo Santos
Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira
Guerra, Simony Trevisan
Latosinski, Giulia Soares
Rossi, Bruna Fernanda
Rall, Vera Lucia Mores
Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo
author_sort Rossi, Rodolfo Santos
collection PubMed
description A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were extended to assess whether CLOXIMM was not inferior to CEFIMM (Trial 2). Nine farms were included in the study. Milk samples were collected from all quarters of all lactating cows for microbiological identification of S. agalactiae. Positive cows were randomly allocated into four groups: CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, or negative control (CONTROL). Study outcomes were bacteriological cure at 14 (CURE14), 21 (CURE21), and 14 and 21 (CURE1421) days after treatment onset, and somatic cell count. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of cure between each treatment and CONTROL. Non-inferiority analysis was performed considering a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) and non-inferiority margins (Δ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. Adjusted S. agalactiae bacteriological cure for CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, and CONTROL was 86, 98, 55, and 25% at day 14; 82, 93, 52, and 0% at day 21; and 82, 92, 40, and 0% at days 14 and 21, respectively. Treatment with CLOXIMM and CEFIMM resulted in greater bacteriological cure rates, as compared with CEFIM or CONTROL, which does not justify the use of CEFIM in S. agalactiae eradication programs. The CURE14 difference between CEFIMM and CLOXIMM was of 12.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.056–0.184). CLOXIMM was considered not inferior to CEFIMM for Δ = 0.20 or 0.25 and inconclusive for Δ = 0.10 or 0.15. Thus, it should be pondered by veterinarians whether an expected 12.1 (5.6–18.4) percentage points increase in cure rate would justify the use of a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as opposed to a combination of traditional IMM drugs (cloxacillin and ampicillin) to treat S. agalactiae subclinical mastitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6483254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64832542019-05-09 Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis Rossi, Rodolfo Santos Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira Guerra, Simony Trevisan Latosinski, Giulia Soares Rossi, Bruna Fernanda Rall, Vera Lucia Mores Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo PLoS One Research Article A randomized clinical trial was conducted to assess efficacy of intramammary cloxacillin and ampicillin (CLOXIMM), intramammary cefquinome (CEFIMM), and intramuscular cefquinome (CEFIM) to treat Streptococcus agalactiae intramammary infections (Trial 1). Subsequently, two treatment groups were extended to assess whether CLOXIMM was not inferior to CEFIMM (Trial 2). Nine farms were included in the study. Milk samples were collected from all quarters of all lactating cows for microbiological identification of S. agalactiae. Positive cows were randomly allocated into four groups: CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, or negative control (CONTROL). Study outcomes were bacteriological cure at 14 (CURE14), 21 (CURE21), and 14 and 21 (CURE1421) days after treatment onset, and somatic cell count. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of cure between each treatment and CONTROL. Non-inferiority analysis was performed considering a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) and non-inferiority margins (Δ) of 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. Adjusted S. agalactiae bacteriological cure for CLOXIMM, CEFIMM, CEFIM, and CONTROL was 86, 98, 55, and 25% at day 14; 82, 93, 52, and 0% at day 21; and 82, 92, 40, and 0% at days 14 and 21, respectively. Treatment with CLOXIMM and CEFIMM resulted in greater bacteriological cure rates, as compared with CEFIM or CONTROL, which does not justify the use of CEFIM in S. agalactiae eradication programs. The CURE14 difference between CEFIMM and CLOXIMM was of 12.1 percentage points (95% CI: 0.056–0.184). CLOXIMM was considered not inferior to CEFIMM for Δ = 0.20 or 0.25 and inconclusive for Δ = 0.10 or 0.15. Thus, it should be pondered by veterinarians whether an expected 12.1 (5.6–18.4) percentage points increase in cure rate would justify the use of a fourth-generation cephalosporin, as opposed to a combination of traditional IMM drugs (cloxacillin and ampicillin) to treat S. agalactiae subclinical mastitis. Public Library of Science 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6483254/ /pubmed/31022270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091 Text en © 2019 Rossi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rossi, Rodolfo Santos
Amarante, Ariadne Ferreira
Guerra, Simony Trevisan
Latosinski, Giulia Soares
Rossi, Bruna Fernanda
Rall, Vera Lucia Mores
Pantoja, Jose Carlos de Figueiredo
Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title_full Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title_fullStr Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title_short Efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with Streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
title_sort efficacy of cefquinome and a combination of cloxacillin and ampicillin for treatment of dairy cows with streptococcus agalactiae subclinical mastitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216091
work_keys_str_mv AT rossirodolfosantos efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT amaranteariadneferreira efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT guerrasimonytrevisan efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT latosinskigiuliasoares efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT rossibrunafernanda efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT rallveraluciamores efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis
AT pantojajosecarlosdefigueiredo efficacyofcefquinomeandacombinationofcloxacillinandampicillinfortreatmentofdairycowswithstreptococcusagalactiaesubclinicalmastitis