Cargando…

Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices

This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko, Torii, Hidemasa, Masui, Sachiko, Ayaki, Masahiko, Tsubota, Kazuo, Negishi, Kazuno
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
_version_ 1783414046127554560
author Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko
Torii, Hidemasa
Masui, Sachiko
Ayaki, Masahiko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Negishi, Kazuno
author_facet Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko
Torii, Hidemasa
Masui, Sachiko
Ayaki, Masahiko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Negishi, Kazuno
author_sort Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko
collection PubMed
description This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 µm, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 µm, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6483997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64839972019-05-07 Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko Torii, Hidemasa Masui, Sachiko Ayaki, Masahiko Tsubota, Kazuo Negishi, Kazuno Sci Rep Article This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 µm, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 µm, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6483997/ /pubmed/31024017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko
Torii, Hidemasa
Masui, Sachiko
Ayaki, Masahiko
Tsubota, Kazuo
Negishi, Kazuno
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title_full Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title_fullStr Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title_full_unstemmed Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title_short Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
title_sort ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
work_keys_str_mv AT omotomikikamikawatoko ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices
AT toriihidemasa ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices
AT masuisachiko ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices
AT ayakimasahiko ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices
AT tsubotakazuo ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices
AT negishikazuno ocularbiometryandrefractiveoutcomesusingtwosweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographybasedbiometerswithsegmentalorequivalentrefractiveindices