Cargando…

Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)

Many species are known to use vocalizations to recruit con- and heterospecifics to mobbing events. In birds, the vocalizations of the Family Paridae (titmice, tits and chickadees) are well-studied and have been shown to recruit conspecifics and encode information about predation risk. Species use th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalb, Nadine, Anger, Fabian, Randler, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43087-9
_version_ 1783414059003019264
author Kalb, Nadine
Anger, Fabian
Randler, Christoph
author_facet Kalb, Nadine
Anger, Fabian
Randler, Christoph
author_sort Kalb, Nadine
collection PubMed
description Many species are known to use vocalizations to recruit con- and heterospecifics to mobbing events. In birds, the vocalizations of the Family Paridae (titmice, tits and chickadees) are well-studied and have been shown to recruit conspecifics and encode information about predation risk. Species use the number of elements within a call, call frequency or call type to encode information. We conducted a study with great tits (Parus major) in the field where we presented taxidermy mounts of two predators of different threat levels (tawny owl, Strix aluco, and sparrowhawk, Accipiter nisus) and compared the mobbing calls of these two contexts. We hypothesized, based on results of studies in other paridae species, that tits vary the number or type of elements of a call according to predatory context. We found great tits to vary the number of D elements and the interval between those elements. Great tits produced significantly longer D calls with more elements and longer intervals between elements when confronted with a sparrowhawk (high-threat) compared to a tawny owl (low-threat) mount. Furthermore, birds produced more D calls towards the high-threat predator. This suggests that the basic D calls are varied depending on threat intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6484080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64840802019-05-13 Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major) Kalb, Nadine Anger, Fabian Randler, Christoph Sci Rep Article Many species are known to use vocalizations to recruit con- and heterospecifics to mobbing events. In birds, the vocalizations of the Family Paridae (titmice, tits and chickadees) are well-studied and have been shown to recruit conspecifics and encode information about predation risk. Species use the number of elements within a call, call frequency or call type to encode information. We conducted a study with great tits (Parus major) in the field where we presented taxidermy mounts of two predators of different threat levels (tawny owl, Strix aluco, and sparrowhawk, Accipiter nisus) and compared the mobbing calls of these two contexts. We hypothesized, based on results of studies in other paridae species, that tits vary the number or type of elements of a call according to predatory context. We found great tits to vary the number of D elements and the interval between those elements. Great tits produced significantly longer D calls with more elements and longer intervals between elements when confronted with a sparrowhawk (high-threat) compared to a tawny owl (low-threat) mount. Furthermore, birds produced more D calls towards the high-threat predator. This suggests that the basic D calls are varied depending on threat intensity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6484080/ /pubmed/31024037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43087-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kalb, Nadine
Anger, Fabian
Randler, Christoph
Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title_full Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title_fullStr Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title_full_unstemmed Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title_short Subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (Parus major)
title_sort subtle variations in mobbing calls are predator-specific in great tits (parus major)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31024037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43087-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kalbnadine subtlevariationsinmobbingcallsarepredatorspecificingreattitsparusmajor
AT angerfabian subtlevariationsinmobbingcallsarepredatorspecificingreattitsparusmajor
AT randlerchristoph subtlevariationsinmobbingcallsarepredatorspecificingreattitsparusmajor