Cargando…
A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States
This policy brief examines preventive services state legislation trends in the United States during uncertainty regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which requires certain coverage of 4 evidence-based preventive services categories without additional patient costs under §2713. We used a legal ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31018737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958019841514 |
_version_ | 1783414082453372928 |
---|---|
author | Gakh, Maxim Cris, Cody Cheong, Prescott Coughenour, Courtney |
author_facet | Gakh, Maxim Cris, Cody Cheong, Prescott Coughenour, Courtney |
author_sort | Gakh, Maxim |
collection | PubMed |
description | This policy brief examines preventive services state legislation trends in the United States during uncertainty regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which requires certain coverage of 4 evidence-based preventive services categories without additional patient costs under §2713. We used a legal mapping approach to search for and analyze state legislation related to preventive services proposed or enacted over a 25-month period of ACA uncertainty. We screened 1231 bills and coded the 76 screened-in bills. Next, we determined their characteristics and examined trends. Bills originated in 28 states, and 69.7% were not enacted. Only 3.9% contained requirements contingent on ACA modifications. About 56.6% referenced services covered by §2713, but usually not entire §2713 categories. Bills also mentioned preventive services in general (53.9%) and services outside §2713’s scope (21.1%). About 55.3% applied to private insurance, and 75.0% only to one patient group. Bills generally promoted access, and 51.3% specifically prohibited cost-sharing. But 26.3% of the bills limited access to preventive services. State-level legislation targets preventive services, usually expanding, but sometimes limiting, access. Most bills single out specific services without fully incorporating evidence-based recommendations. State legislation may therefore promote access to preventive services but can favor certain services, deviate from experts’ recommendations, and increase nationwide variability. State legislation can function as an important lever for access to preventive services across patient groups. This may be especially important during uncertainty about federal policy. However, the design of state-level proposals is critical for maximizing access to preventive services. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6484240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64842402019-04-30 A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States Gakh, Maxim Cris, Cody Cheong, Prescott Coughenour, Courtney Inquiry Policy Brief This policy brief examines preventive services state legislation trends in the United States during uncertainty regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which requires certain coverage of 4 evidence-based preventive services categories without additional patient costs under §2713. We used a legal mapping approach to search for and analyze state legislation related to preventive services proposed or enacted over a 25-month period of ACA uncertainty. We screened 1231 bills and coded the 76 screened-in bills. Next, we determined their characteristics and examined trends. Bills originated in 28 states, and 69.7% were not enacted. Only 3.9% contained requirements contingent on ACA modifications. About 56.6% referenced services covered by §2713, but usually not entire §2713 categories. Bills also mentioned preventive services in general (53.9%) and services outside §2713’s scope (21.1%). About 55.3% applied to private insurance, and 75.0% only to one patient group. Bills generally promoted access, and 51.3% specifically prohibited cost-sharing. But 26.3% of the bills limited access to preventive services. State-level legislation targets preventive services, usually expanding, but sometimes limiting, access. Most bills single out specific services without fully incorporating evidence-based recommendations. State legislation may therefore promote access to preventive services but can favor certain services, deviate from experts’ recommendations, and increase nationwide variability. State legislation can function as an important lever for access to preventive services across patient groups. This may be especially important during uncertainty about federal policy. However, the design of state-level proposals is critical for maximizing access to preventive services. SAGE Publications 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6484240/ /pubmed/31018737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958019841514 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Policy Brief Gakh, Maxim Cris, Cody Cheong, Prescott Coughenour, Courtney A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title | A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title_full | A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title_fullStr | A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title_short | A State of Uncertainty: An Analysis of Recent State Legislative Proposals to Regulate Preventive Services in the United States |
title_sort | state of uncertainty: an analysis of recent state legislative proposals to regulate preventive services in the united states |
topic | Policy Brief |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31018737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0046958019841514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gakhmaxim astateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT criscody astateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT cheongprescott astateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT coughenourcourtney astateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT gakhmaxim stateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT criscody stateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT cheongprescott stateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates AT coughenourcourtney stateofuncertaintyananalysisofrecentstatelegislativeproposalstoregulatepreventiveservicesintheunitedstates |