Cargando…
Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563 |
_version_ | 1783414085269848064 |
---|---|
author | Somers, Charisse Lewczuk, Piotr Sieben, Anne Van Broeckhoven, Christine De Deyn, Peter Paul Kornhuber, Johannes Martin, Jean-Jacques Bjerke, Maria Engelborghs, Sebastiaan |
author_facet | Somers, Charisse Lewczuk, Piotr Sieben, Anne Van Broeckhoven, Christine De Deyn, Peter Paul Kornhuber, Johannes Martin, Jean-Jacques Bjerke, Maria Engelborghs, Sebastiaan |
author_sort | Somers, Charisse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set up as a diagnostic-relevant interpretation algorithm. OBJECTIVE: To validate the ES algorithm in a cohort of neuropathologically confirmed cases with AD (n = 106) and non-AD dementia (n = 57). METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker concentrations of Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181) were measured with commercially available single analyte ELISA kits. Based on these biomarkers, ES was calculated as previously reported. RESULTS: This algorithm proved to categorize AD in different degrees of likelihood, ranging from neurochemically “normal”, “improbably having AD”, “possibly having AD”, to “probably having AD”, with a diagnostic accuracy of 74% using the neuropathology as a reference. CONCLUSION: The ability of the ES to overcome the high variability of raw CSF biomarker data may provide a useful diagnostic tool for comparing neurochemical diagnoses between different labs or methods used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6484252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64842522019-05-13 Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects Somers, Charisse Lewczuk, Piotr Sieben, Anne Van Broeckhoven, Christine De Deyn, Peter Paul Kornhuber, Johannes Martin, Jean-Jacques Bjerke, Maria Engelborghs, Sebastiaan J Alzheimers Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set up as a diagnostic-relevant interpretation algorithm. OBJECTIVE: To validate the ES algorithm in a cohort of neuropathologically confirmed cases with AD (n = 106) and non-AD dementia (n = 57). METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker concentrations of Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181) were measured with commercially available single analyte ELISA kits. Based on these biomarkers, ES was calculated as previously reported. RESULTS: This algorithm proved to categorize AD in different degrees of likelihood, ranging from neurochemically “normal”, “improbably having AD”, “possibly having AD”, to “probably having AD”, with a diagnostic accuracy of 74% using the neuropathology as a reference. CONCLUSION: The ability of the ES to overcome the high variability of raw CSF biomarker data may provide a useful diagnostic tool for comparing neurochemical diagnoses between different labs or methods used. IOS Press 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6484252/ /pubmed/30883344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563 Text en © 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Somers, Charisse Lewczuk, Piotr Sieben, Anne Van Broeckhoven, Christine De Deyn, Peter Paul Kornhuber, Johannes Martin, Jean-Jacques Bjerke, Maria Engelborghs, Sebastiaan Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title | Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title_full | Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title_short | Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects |
title_sort | validation of the erlangen score algorithm for differential dementia diagnosis in autopsy-confirmed subjects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somerscharisse validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT lewczukpiotr validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT siebenanne validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT vanbroeckhovenchristine validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT dedeynpeterpaul validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT kornhuberjohannes validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT martinjeanjacques validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT bjerkemaria validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects AT engelborghssebastiaan validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects |