Cargando…

Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects

BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somers, Charisse, Lewczuk, Piotr, Sieben, Anne, Van Broeckhoven, Christine, De Deyn, Peter Paul, Kornhuber, Johannes, Martin, Jean-Jacques, Bjerke, Maria, Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: IOS Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563
_version_ 1783414085269848064
author Somers, Charisse
Lewczuk, Piotr
Sieben, Anne
Van Broeckhoven, Christine
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Kornhuber, Johannes
Martin, Jean-Jacques
Bjerke, Maria
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
author_facet Somers, Charisse
Lewczuk, Piotr
Sieben, Anne
Van Broeckhoven, Christine
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Kornhuber, Johannes
Martin, Jean-Jacques
Bjerke, Maria
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
author_sort Somers, Charisse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set up as a diagnostic-relevant interpretation algorithm. OBJECTIVE: To validate the ES algorithm in a cohort of neuropathologically confirmed cases with AD (n = 106) and non-AD dementia (n = 57). METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker concentrations of Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181) were measured with commercially available single analyte ELISA kits. Based on these biomarkers, ES was calculated as previously reported. RESULTS: This algorithm proved to categorize AD in different degrees of likelihood, ranging from neurochemically “normal”, “improbably having AD”, “possibly having AD”, to “probably having AD”, with a diagnostic accuracy of 74% using the neuropathology as a reference. CONCLUSION: The ability of the ES to overcome the high variability of raw CSF biomarker data may provide a useful diagnostic tool for comparing neurochemical diagnoses between different labs or methods used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6484252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher IOS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64842522019-05-13 Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects Somers, Charisse Lewczuk, Piotr Sieben, Anne Van Broeckhoven, Christine De Deyn, Peter Paul Kornhuber, Johannes Martin, Jean-Jacques Bjerke, Maria Engelborghs, Sebastiaan J Alzheimers Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite decades of research on the optimization of the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its biomarker-based diagnosis is being hampered by the lack of comparability of raw biomarker data. In order to overcome this limitation, the Erlangen Score (ES), among other approaches, was set up as a diagnostic-relevant interpretation algorithm. OBJECTIVE: To validate the ES algorithm in a cohort of neuropathologically confirmed cases with AD (n = 106) and non-AD dementia (n = 57). METHODS: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker concentrations of Aβ(1-42), T-tau, and P-tau(181) were measured with commercially available single analyte ELISA kits. Based on these biomarkers, ES was calculated as previously reported. RESULTS: This algorithm proved to categorize AD in different degrees of likelihood, ranging from neurochemically “normal”, “improbably having AD”, “possibly having AD”, to “probably having AD”, with a diagnostic accuracy of 74% using the neuropathology as a reference. CONCLUSION: The ability of the ES to overcome the high variability of raw CSF biomarker data may provide a useful diagnostic tool for comparing neurochemical diagnoses between different labs or methods used. IOS Press 2019-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6484252/ /pubmed/30883344 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563 Text en © 2019 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Somers, Charisse
Lewczuk, Piotr
Sieben, Anne
Van Broeckhoven, Christine
De Deyn, Peter Paul
Kornhuber, Johannes
Martin, Jean-Jacques
Bjerke, Maria
Engelborghs, Sebastiaan
Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title_full Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title_fullStr Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title_short Validation of the Erlangen Score Algorithm for Differential Dementia Diagnosis in Autopsy-Confirmed Subjects
title_sort validation of the erlangen score algorithm for differential dementia diagnosis in autopsy-confirmed subjects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30883344
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180563
work_keys_str_mv AT somerscharisse validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT lewczukpiotr validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT siebenanne validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT vanbroeckhovenchristine validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT dedeynpeterpaul validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT kornhuberjohannes validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT martinjeanjacques validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT bjerkemaria validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects
AT engelborghssebastiaan validationoftheerlangenscorealgorithmfordifferentialdementiadiagnosisinautopsyconfirmedsubjects