Cargando…
Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis
Afatinib, a second-generation, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, shows better suppression of T790M-positive lung cancer cells than gefitinib in preclinical studies. However, whether the effect of afatinib on T790M acquisition differs from that of gefitinib when used clinically as first-line therapy re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Neoplasia Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.04.004 |
_version_ | 1783414093753876480 |
---|---|
author | Yoon, Byung Woo Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Hyeon Choi, Chang-Min Rho, Jin Kyung Yoon, Shinkyo Lee, Dae Ho Kim, Sang-We Jang, Tae-Won Lee, Jae Cheol |
author_facet | Yoon, Byung Woo Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Hyeon Choi, Chang-Min Rho, Jin Kyung Yoon, Shinkyo Lee, Dae Ho Kim, Sang-We Jang, Tae-Won Lee, Jae Cheol |
author_sort | Yoon, Byung Woo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Afatinib, a second-generation, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, shows better suppression of T790M-positive lung cancer cells than gefitinib in preclinical studies. However, whether the effect of afatinib on T790M acquisition differs from that of gefitinib when used clinically as first-line therapy remains unclear. To reaffirm the preclinical efficacy of afatinib on T790M-positive lung cancer cells, H1975 cells and established PC-9 cells resistant to gefitinib and erlotinib by T790M were used. In total, 398 patients with second biopsy at progression with stage IIIB/IV non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation, treated with afatinib or gefitinib as first-line therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates. Afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies, which are resistant to gefitinib, but not those with high T790M allele frequencies. Afatinib and gefitinib showed similar efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 vs 13.4 months, P = .08) and overall survival (OS) (29.3 vs 28.5 months, P = .76). T790M patients had better PFS and OS than those without T790M. There was no significant difference in the cumulative T790M acquisition ratio over time between afatinib and gefitinib (48.8% vs 59.3%, P = .317). The median time to acquire T790M was 12.9 months for afatinib and 15.7 months for gefitinib (P = .342). Although afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies in preclinical studies, this could not be translated into clinical efficacy in terms of lowering the rate or delaying the time of T790M acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6484288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Neoplasia Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64842882019-05-02 Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis Yoon, Byung Woo Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Hyeon Choi, Chang-Min Rho, Jin Kyung Yoon, Shinkyo Lee, Dae Ho Kim, Sang-We Jang, Tae-Won Lee, Jae Cheol Transl Oncol Original article Afatinib, a second-generation, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, shows better suppression of T790M-positive lung cancer cells than gefitinib in preclinical studies. However, whether the effect of afatinib on T790M acquisition differs from that of gefitinib when used clinically as first-line therapy remains unclear. To reaffirm the preclinical efficacy of afatinib on T790M-positive lung cancer cells, H1975 cells and established PC-9 cells resistant to gefitinib and erlotinib by T790M were used. In total, 398 patients with second biopsy at progression with stage IIIB/IV non–small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation, treated with afatinib or gefitinib as first-line therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates. Afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies, which are resistant to gefitinib, but not those with high T790M allele frequencies. Afatinib and gefitinib showed similar efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 vs 13.4 months, P = .08) and overall survival (OS) (29.3 vs 28.5 months, P = .76). T790M patients had better PFS and OS than those without T790M. There was no significant difference in the cumulative T790M acquisition ratio over time between afatinib and gefitinib (48.8% vs 59.3%, P = .317). The median time to acquire T790M was 12.9 months for afatinib and 15.7 months for gefitinib (P = .342). Although afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies in preclinical studies, this could not be translated into clinical efficacy in terms of lowering the rate or delaying the time of T790M acquisition. Neoplasia Press 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6484288/ /pubmed/31030101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.04.004 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article Yoon, Byung Woo Kim, Jae Hoon Lee, Seung Hyeon Choi, Chang-Min Rho, Jin Kyung Yoon, Shinkyo Lee, Dae Ho Kim, Sang-We Jang, Tae-Won Lee, Jae Cheol Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title | Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of t790m acquisition between patients treated with afatinib and gefitinib as first-line therapy: retrospective propensity score matching analysis |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2019.04.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoonbyungwoo comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT kimjaehoon comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT leeseunghyeon comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT choichangmin comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT rhojinkyung comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yoonshinkyo comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT leedaeho comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT kimsangwe comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT jangtaewon comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis AT leejaecheol comparisonoft790macquisitionbetweenpatientstreatedwithafatinibandgefitinibasfirstlinetherapyretrospectivepropensityscorematchinganalysis |