Cargando…

Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery

BACKGROUND: Surgical Process Modelling (SPM) offers the possibility to automatically gain insight in the surgical workflow, with the potential to improve OR logistics and surgical care. Most studies have focussed on phase recognition modelling of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because of its stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meeuwsen, F. C., van Luyn, F., Blikkendaal, M. D., Jansen, F. W., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6417-4
_version_ 1783414175860523008
author Meeuwsen, F. C.
van Luyn, F.
Blikkendaal, M. D.
Jansen, F. W.
van den Dobbelsteen, J. J.
author_facet Meeuwsen, F. C.
van Luyn, F.
Blikkendaal, M. D.
Jansen, F. W.
van den Dobbelsteen, J. J.
author_sort Meeuwsen, F. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical Process Modelling (SPM) offers the possibility to automatically gain insight in the surgical workflow, with the potential to improve OR logistics and surgical care. Most studies have focussed on phase recognition modelling of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because of its standard and frequent execution. To demonstrate the broad applicability of SPM, more diverse and complex procedures need to be studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy in which we can recognise and extract surgical phases in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) with inherent variability in procedure time. To show the applicability of the approach, the model was used to automatically predict surgical end-times. METHODS: A dataset of 40 video-recorded LHs was manually annotated for instrument use and divided into ten surgical phases. The use of instruments provided the feature input for building a Random Forest surgical phase recognition model that was trained to automatically recognise surgical phases. Tenfold cross-validation was performed to optimise the model for predicting the surgical end-time throughout the procedure. RESULTS: Average surgery time is 128 ± 27 min. Large variability within specific phases is seen. Overall, the Random Forest model reaches an accuracy of 77% recognising the current phase in the procedure. Six of the phases are predicted accurately over 80% of their duration. When predicting the surgical end-time, on average an error of 16 ± 13 min is reached throughout the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an intra-operative approach to recognise surgical phases in 40 laparoscopic hysterectomy cases based on instrument usage data. The model is capable of automatic detection of surgical phases for generation of a solid prediction of the surgical end-time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6484813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64848132019-05-15 Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery Meeuwsen, F. C. van Luyn, F. Blikkendaal, M. D. Jansen, F. W. van den Dobbelsteen, J. J. Surg Endosc Article BACKGROUND: Surgical Process Modelling (SPM) offers the possibility to automatically gain insight in the surgical workflow, with the potential to improve OR logistics and surgical care. Most studies have focussed on phase recognition modelling of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, because of its standard and frequent execution. To demonstrate the broad applicability of SPM, more diverse and complex procedures need to be studied. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy in which we can recognise and extract surgical phases in laparoscopic hysterectomies (LHs) with inherent variability in procedure time. To show the applicability of the approach, the model was used to automatically predict surgical end-times. METHODS: A dataset of 40 video-recorded LHs was manually annotated for instrument use and divided into ten surgical phases. The use of instruments provided the feature input for building a Random Forest surgical phase recognition model that was trained to automatically recognise surgical phases. Tenfold cross-validation was performed to optimise the model for predicting the surgical end-time throughout the procedure. RESULTS: Average surgery time is 128 ± 27 min. Large variability within specific phases is seen. Overall, the Random Forest model reaches an accuracy of 77% recognising the current phase in the procedure. Six of the phases are predicted accurately over 80% of their duration. When predicting the surgical end-time, on average an error of 16 ± 13 min is reached throughout the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an intra-operative approach to recognise surgical phases in 40 laparoscopic hysterectomy cases based on instrument usage data. The model is capable of automatic detection of surgical phases for generation of a solid prediction of the surgical end-time. Springer US 2018-09-05 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6484813/ /pubmed/30187202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6417-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Meeuwsen, F. C.
van Luyn, F.
Blikkendaal, M. D.
Jansen, F. W.
van den Dobbelsteen, J. J.
Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title_full Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title_fullStr Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title_full_unstemmed Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title_short Surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
title_sort surgical phase modelling in minimal invasive surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6484813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6417-4
work_keys_str_mv AT meeuwsenfc surgicalphasemodellinginminimalinvasivesurgery
AT vanluynf surgicalphasemodellinginminimalinvasivesurgery
AT blikkendaalmd surgicalphasemodellinginminimalinvasivesurgery
AT jansenfw surgicalphasemodellinginminimalinvasivesurgery
AT vandendobbelsteenjj surgicalphasemodellinginminimalinvasivesurgery