Cargando…
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x |
_version_ | 1783414210306244608 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Sheng-Hao Lin, Hsiu-Jen Shen, Hsain-Chung Pan, Ru-Yu Yang, Jui-Jung |
author_facet | Wang, Sheng-Hao Lin, Hsiu-Jen Shen, Hsain-Chung Pan, Ru-Yu Yang, Jui-Jung |
author_sort | Wang, Sheng-Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. METHODS: After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. RESULTS: The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6485083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64850832019-05-03 Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation Wang, Sheng-Hao Lin, Hsiu-Jen Shen, Hsain-Chung Pan, Ru-Yu Yang, Jui-Jung BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. METHODS: After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. RESULTS: The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength. BioMed Central 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6485083/ /pubmed/31027505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Sheng-Hao Lin, Hsiu-Jen Shen, Hsain-Chung Pan, Ru-Yu Yang, Jui-Jung Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title | Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_full | Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_short | Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
title_sort | biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshenghao biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT linhsiujen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT shenhsainchung biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT panruyu biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation AT yangjuijung biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation |