Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation

BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Sheng-Hao, Lin, Hsiu-Jen, Shen, Hsain-Chung, Pan, Ru-Yu, Yang, Jui-Jung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x
_version_ 1783414210306244608
author Wang, Sheng-Hao
Lin, Hsiu-Jen
Shen, Hsain-Chung
Pan, Ru-Yu
Yang, Jui-Jung
author_facet Wang, Sheng-Hao
Lin, Hsiu-Jen
Shen, Hsain-Chung
Pan, Ru-Yu
Yang, Jui-Jung
author_sort Wang, Sheng-Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. METHODS: After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. RESULTS: The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6485083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64850832019-05-03 Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation Wang, Sheng-Hao Lin, Hsiu-Jen Shen, Hsain-Chung Pan, Ru-Yu Yang, Jui-Jung BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A method of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws was proposed as a surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures. However, there are no mechanical studies about the cannulated screw used in the fixation of midshaft clavicle fracture. We conducted this study to compare the construct bending stiffness of a fixation midshaft clavicle fracture with a Knowles pin, cannulated screw and reconstruction plate. In addition, purchase lengths of both intramedullary devices were measured. METHODS: After transverse osteotomy over the midpoint for fracture simulation, eighteen synthetic clavicles were assigned to 3 groups and fixed with reconstruction plate, Knowles pin or cannulated screw. Purchase length was defined as the engaged length of the intramedullary portion of the two intramedullary devices Stiffness, yield load and maximum load of the cantilever bending test were calculated of each tested synthetic bones. RESULTS: The Knowles pin group had a significantly longer average intramedullary purchase length compared with that of the cannulated screw group. The construct stiffness in the reconstruction plate group (5.6 ± 0.9 N/mm) was higher than that of the intramedullary devices; the Knowles pin group (3.1 ± 0.6 N/mm) provided a greater construct stiffness than did the cannulated screw group (1.7 ± 0.4 N/mm) (p = 0.007). The cannulated screw group had the lowest yield and maximum load compared with the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin groups. Both the reconstruction plate and Knowles pin failed at the implant-bone interface. However, the cannulated screw group failed at the osteotomy site with broken implants. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures with cannulated screws may lead to early failure due to inadequate mechanical strength. Ideal intramedullary clavicle devices should supply adequate intramedullary purchase lengths and mechanical strength. BioMed Central 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6485083/ /pubmed/31027505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Sheng-Hao
Lin, Hsiu-Jen
Shen, Hsain-Chung
Pan, Ru-Yu
Yang, Jui-Jung
Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_full Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_short Biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
title_sort biomechanical comparison between solid and cannulated intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31027505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2560-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshenghao biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT linhsiujen biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT shenhsainchung biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT panruyu biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation
AT yangjuijung biomechanicalcomparisonbetweensolidandcannulatedintramedullarydevicesformidshaftclaviclefixation