Cargando…

Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion

OBJECTIVE: To describe individual-level delay in obtaining abortion associated with use of the Massachusetts judicial bypass system, which legal minors (aged 17 years or younger) use to obtain abortion without consent of a parent or legal guardian in the setting of Massachusetts' parental conse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janiak, Elizabeth, Fulcher, Isabel R., Cottrill, Alischer A., Tantoco, Nicole, Mason, Ashley H., Fortin, Jennifer, Sabino, Jamie, Goldberg, Alisa B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30969206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190
_version_ 1783414266665107456
author Janiak, Elizabeth
Fulcher, Isabel R.
Cottrill, Alischer A.
Tantoco, Nicole
Mason, Ashley H.
Fortin, Jennifer
Sabino, Jamie
Goldberg, Alisa B.
author_facet Janiak, Elizabeth
Fulcher, Isabel R.
Cottrill, Alischer A.
Tantoco, Nicole
Mason, Ashley H.
Fortin, Jennifer
Sabino, Jamie
Goldberg, Alisa B.
author_sort Janiak, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe individual-level delay in obtaining abortion associated with use of the Massachusetts judicial bypass system, which legal minors (aged 17 years or younger) use to obtain abortion without consent of a parent or legal guardian in the setting of Massachusetts' parental consent law for abortion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,026 abortions among minors at a large, statewide network of abortion clinics between 2010 and 2016. Delay was defined as the number of calendar days between the minor's first call to the clinic to schedule an abortion, and the day the abortion was received. RESULTS: In the study population, 1,559 (77%) abortions were obtained with parental consent and 467 (23%) using judicial bypass. Abortions after judicial bypass were more common among minors identifying as Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, or other race, those of low socioeconomic status (as indicated by having Medicaid insurance) and those with a prior birth or prior abortion (all P<.05). Minors with parental consent received their abortion a mean of 8.6 days after initial contact, compared with 14.8 days for minors with judicial bypass, for an unadjusted difference of 6.1 days. In multivariable linear regression modeling adjusting for demographic differences between groups, this difference persisted: minors who obtained abortions after judicial bypass had a significantly greater delay compared with those with parental consent (adjusted mean difference = 5.2 days; 95% CI 4.3 to 6.2). Using multivariable logistic regression modeling, minors with judicial bypass also had higher odds of becoming ineligible for medication abortion between the day of first call and the day of procedure (adjusted odds ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.26). CONCLUSION: Massachusetts' parental consent law for abortion is associated with delay among minors and thereby may constrain the clinical options available to them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6485490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64854902019-05-29 Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion Janiak, Elizabeth Fulcher, Isabel R. Cottrill, Alischer A. Tantoco, Nicole Mason, Ashley H. Fortin, Jennifer Sabino, Jamie Goldberg, Alisa B. Obstet Gynecol Contents OBJECTIVE: To describe individual-level delay in obtaining abortion associated with use of the Massachusetts judicial bypass system, which legal minors (aged 17 years or younger) use to obtain abortion without consent of a parent or legal guardian in the setting of Massachusetts' parental consent law for abortion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,026 abortions among minors at a large, statewide network of abortion clinics between 2010 and 2016. Delay was defined as the number of calendar days between the minor's first call to the clinic to schedule an abortion, and the day the abortion was received. RESULTS: In the study population, 1,559 (77%) abortions were obtained with parental consent and 467 (23%) using judicial bypass. Abortions after judicial bypass were more common among minors identifying as Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, or other race, those of low socioeconomic status (as indicated by having Medicaid insurance) and those with a prior birth or prior abortion (all P<.05). Minors with parental consent received their abortion a mean of 8.6 days after initial contact, compared with 14.8 days for minors with judicial bypass, for an unadjusted difference of 6.1 days. In multivariable linear regression modeling adjusting for demographic differences between groups, this difference persisted: minors who obtained abortions after judicial bypass had a significantly greater delay compared with those with parental consent (adjusted mean difference = 5.2 days; 95% CI 4.3 to 6.2). Using multivariable logistic regression modeling, minors with judicial bypass also had higher odds of becoming ineligible for medication abortion between the day of first call and the day of procedure (adjusted odds ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.26). CONCLUSION: Massachusetts' parental consent law for abortion is associated with delay among minors and thereby may constrain the clinical options available to them. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2019-05 2019-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6485490/ /pubmed/30969206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Contents
Janiak, Elizabeth
Fulcher, Isabel R.
Cottrill, Alischer A.
Tantoco, Nicole
Mason, Ashley H.
Fortin, Jennifer
Sabino, Jamie
Goldberg, Alisa B.
Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title_full Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title_fullStr Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title_full_unstemmed Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title_short Massachusetts' Parental Consent Law and Procedural Timing Among Adolescents Undergoing Abortion
title_sort massachusetts' parental consent law and procedural timing among adolescents undergoing abortion
topic Contents
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30969206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003190
work_keys_str_mv AT janiakelizabeth massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT fulcherisabelr massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT cottrillalischera massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT tantoconicole massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT masonashleyh massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT fortinjennifer massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT sabinojamie massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion
AT goldbergalisab massachusettsparentalconsentlawandproceduraltimingamongadolescentsundergoingabortion