Cargando…

Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age

BACKGROUND: Small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants should be identified before birth because of an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of fetal growth rate by gestational age on the prediction of SGA and to identify the optimal time to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min-A, Han, Gwan Hee, Kim, Young-Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31026299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215737
_version_ 1783414286813495296
author Kim, Min-A
Han, Gwan Hee
Kim, Young-Han
author_facet Kim, Min-A
Han, Gwan Hee
Kim, Young-Han
author_sort Kim, Min-A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants should be identified before birth because of an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of fetal growth rate by gestational age on the prediction of SGA and to identify the optimal time to initiate intensive fetal monitoring to detect SGA in low-risk women. We also sought to determine which the ultrasonographic parameters that contribute substantially to the birthweight determination. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 442 healthy pregnant women with singleton pregnancies. There were 328 adequate-for-gestational age (AGA) neonates and 114 SGA infants delivered between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks of gestation. We compared the biparietal diameters (BPD), head circumferences (HC), abdominal circumferences (AC), femur lengths (FL), and estimated fetal weights (EFW) obtained on each ultrasound to determine which of these parameters was the best indicator of SGA. We created receiver operating characteristic curves, calculated the areas under the curves (AUCs), and analyzed the data using multivariable logistic regressions to assess the ultrasound screening performances and identify the best predictive factor. RESULTS: Among the four ultrasonographic parameters, the AC measurement between 24+0~28+6 weeks achieved a sensitivity of 79.5% and a specificity of 71.7%, with an AUC of 0.806 in the prediction of SGA. AC showed consistently higher AUCs above 0.8 with 64~80% sensitivities as gestational age progressed. EFW measurements from 33+0~35+6 gestational weeks achieved a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 87.6%, with an AUC of 0.826. In a conditional growth model developed from the linear mixed regression, the value differences between AC and EFW in the SGA and AGA groups became even more pronounced after 33+0~35+6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Healthy low-risk women with a low fetal AC after 24 weeks’ gestation need to be monitored carefully for fetal growth to identify SGA infants with a risk for adverse perinatal outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6485641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64856412019-05-09 Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age Kim, Min-A Han, Gwan Hee Kim, Young-Han PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants should be identified before birth because of an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of fetal growth rate by gestational age on the prediction of SGA and to identify the optimal time to initiate intensive fetal monitoring to detect SGA in low-risk women. We also sought to determine which the ultrasonographic parameters that contribute substantially to the birthweight determination. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 442 healthy pregnant women with singleton pregnancies. There were 328 adequate-for-gestational age (AGA) neonates and 114 SGA infants delivered between 37+0 and 41+6 weeks of gestation. We compared the biparietal diameters (BPD), head circumferences (HC), abdominal circumferences (AC), femur lengths (FL), and estimated fetal weights (EFW) obtained on each ultrasound to determine which of these parameters was the best indicator of SGA. We created receiver operating characteristic curves, calculated the areas under the curves (AUCs), and analyzed the data using multivariable logistic regressions to assess the ultrasound screening performances and identify the best predictive factor. RESULTS: Among the four ultrasonographic parameters, the AC measurement between 24+0~28+6 weeks achieved a sensitivity of 79.5% and a specificity of 71.7%, with an AUC of 0.806 in the prediction of SGA. AC showed consistently higher AUCs above 0.8 with 64~80% sensitivities as gestational age progressed. EFW measurements from 33+0~35+6 gestational weeks achieved a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 87.6%, with an AUC of 0.826. In a conditional growth model developed from the linear mixed regression, the value differences between AC and EFW in the SGA and AGA groups became even more pronounced after 33+0~35+6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Healthy low-risk women with a low fetal AC after 24 weeks’ gestation need to be monitored carefully for fetal growth to identify SGA infants with a risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. Public Library of Science 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6485641/ /pubmed/31026299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215737 Text en © 2019 Kim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Min-A
Han, Gwan Hee
Kim, Young-Han
Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title_full Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title_fullStr Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title_short Prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
title_sort prediction of small-for-gestational age by fetal growth rate according to gestational age
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31026299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215737
work_keys_str_mv AT kimmina predictionofsmallforgestationalagebyfetalgrowthrateaccordingtogestationalage
AT hangwanhee predictionofsmallforgestationalagebyfetalgrowthrateaccordingtogestationalage
AT kimyounghan predictionofsmallforgestationalagebyfetalgrowthrateaccordingtogestationalage