Cargando…

Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) are used as standard care after lumbar fusion surgery though their efficacy is unknown. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study was to elucidate the clinical and radiographic efficacies of LSO treatment in patients who underwent posterior l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujiwara, Hiroyasu, Makino, Takahiro, Yonenobu, Kazuo, Moriguchi, Yu, Oda, Takenori, Kaito, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015183
_version_ 1783414313270116352
author Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
Makino, Takahiro
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Moriguchi, Yu
Oda, Takenori
Kaito, Takashi
author_facet Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
Makino, Takahiro
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Moriguchi, Yu
Oda, Takenori
Kaito, Takashi
author_sort Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) are used as standard care after lumbar fusion surgery though their efficacy is unknown. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study was to elucidate the clinical and radiographic efficacies of LSO treatment in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) of less than 3 segments. METHODS: Seventy-three patients who underwent PLIF were randomly allocated to 3 groups: 1 with custom-made LSO with metallic stays (C group); 1 with ready-made LSO without metallic stays (R group), and 1 without LSO (N group). The patients in the C and R groups were instructed to wear LSO postoperatively for 3 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA-back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and 100-mm visual analog scale for low back pain. Radiographic evaluation included intervertebral fusion rates and loss of correction postoperatively at 2 years. RESULTS: A significant difference in the clinical outcomes was observed only for the lumbar dysfunction domain of JOABPEQ postoperatively at 1 month (N vs C groups; 45% vs 10%, P = .03). Radiographic outcomes were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of orthosis treatment for less than 3 segments in PLIF was observed on clinical and radiographic outcomes. The type of orthosis also did not influence the outcomes. These results suggest that the use of LSO for PLIF can be simplified or is omissible except in patients with severe osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6485872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64858722019-05-29 Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study Fujiwara, Hiroyasu Makino, Takahiro Yonenobu, Kazuo Moriguchi, Yu Oda, Takenori Kaito, Takashi Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) are used as standard care after lumbar fusion surgery though their efficacy is unknown. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study was to elucidate the clinical and radiographic efficacies of LSO treatment in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) of less than 3 segments. METHODS: Seventy-three patients who underwent PLIF were randomly allocated to 3 groups: 1 with custom-made LSO with metallic stays (C group); 1 with ready-made LSO without metallic stays (R group), and 1 without LSO (N group). The patients in the C and R groups were instructed to wear LSO postoperatively for 3 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA-back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and 100-mm visual analog scale for low back pain. Radiographic evaluation included intervertebral fusion rates and loss of correction postoperatively at 2 years. RESULTS: A significant difference in the clinical outcomes was observed only for the lumbar dysfunction domain of JOABPEQ postoperatively at 1 month (N vs C groups; 45% vs 10%, P = .03). Radiographic outcomes were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: No effect of orthosis treatment for less than 3 segments in PLIF was observed on clinical and radiographic outcomes. The type of orthosis also did not influence the outcomes. These results suggest that the use of LSO for PLIF can be simplified or is omissible except in patients with severe osteoporosis. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6485872/ /pubmed/30985709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015183 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Fujiwara, Hiroyasu
Makino, Takahiro
Yonenobu, Kazuo
Moriguchi, Yu
Oda, Takenori
Kaito, Takashi
Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title_full Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title_short Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
title_sort efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion—a prospective randomized study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6485872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015183
work_keys_str_mv AT fujiwarahiroyasu efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT makinotakahiro efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT yonenobukazuo efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT moriguchiyu efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT odatakenori efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kaitotakashi efficacyoflumbarorthosesafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionaprospectiverandomizedstudy