Cargando…
Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes
The last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by different enzymes in prokaryotes. The genes that encode these enzymes include homologs of purH, purP, purO and those encoding the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, here named purV and purJ, respectively. In Bacteria, these re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6486802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30785193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz035 |
_version_ | 1783414397875519488 |
---|---|
author | Costa Brandão Cruz, Dennifier Lima Santana, Lenon Siqueira Guedes, Alexandre Teodoro de Souza, Jorge Arthur Santos Marbach, Phellippe |
author_facet | Costa Brandão Cruz, Dennifier Lima Santana, Lenon Siqueira Guedes, Alexandre Teodoro de Souza, Jorge Arthur Santos Marbach, Phellippe |
author_sort | Costa Brandão Cruz, Dennifier |
collection | PubMed |
description | The last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by different enzymes in prokaryotes. The genes that encode these enzymes include homologs of purH, purP, purO and those encoding the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, here named purV and purJ, respectively. In Bacteria, these reactions are mainly catalyzed by the domains AICARFT and IMPCH of PurH. In Archaea, these reactions may be carried out by PurH and also by PurP and PurO, both considered signatures of this domain and analogous to the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, respectively. These genes were searched for in 1,403 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes publicly available. Our analyses revealed taxonomic patterns for the distribution of these genes and anticorrelations in their occurrence. The analyses of bacterial genomes revealed the existence of genes coding for PurV, PurJ, and PurO, which may no longer be considered signatures of the domain Archaea. Although highly divergent, the PurOs of Archaea and Bacteria show a high level of conservation in the amino acids of the active sites of the protein, allowing us to infer that these enzymes are analogs. Based on the results, we propose that the gene purO was present in the common ancestor of all living beings, whereas the gene encoding PurP emerged after the divergence of Archaea and Bacteria and their isoforms originated in duplication events in the common ancestor of phyla Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. The results reported here expand our understanding of the diversity and evolution of the last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway in prokaryotes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6486802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64868022019-05-01 Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes Costa Brandão Cruz, Dennifier Lima Santana, Lenon Siqueira Guedes, Alexandre Teodoro de Souza, Jorge Arthur Santos Marbach, Phellippe Genome Biol Evol Research Article The last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by different enzymes in prokaryotes. The genes that encode these enzymes include homologs of purH, purP, purO and those encoding the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, here named purV and purJ, respectively. In Bacteria, these reactions are mainly catalyzed by the domains AICARFT and IMPCH of PurH. In Archaea, these reactions may be carried out by PurH and also by PurP and PurO, both considered signatures of this domain and analogous to the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, respectively. These genes were searched for in 1,403 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes publicly available. Our analyses revealed taxonomic patterns for the distribution of these genes and anticorrelations in their occurrence. The analyses of bacterial genomes revealed the existence of genes coding for PurV, PurJ, and PurO, which may no longer be considered signatures of the domain Archaea. Although highly divergent, the PurOs of Archaea and Bacteria show a high level of conservation in the amino acids of the active sites of the protein, allowing us to infer that these enzymes are analogs. Based on the results, we propose that the gene purO was present in the common ancestor of all living beings, whereas the gene encoding PurP emerged after the divergence of Archaea and Bacteria and their isoforms originated in duplication events in the common ancestor of phyla Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota. The results reported here expand our understanding of the diversity and evolution of the last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway in prokaryotes. Oxford University Press 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6486802/ /pubmed/30785193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz035 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Costa Brandão Cruz, Dennifier Lima Santana, Lenon Siqueira Guedes, Alexandre Teodoro de Souza, Jorge Arthur Santos Marbach, Phellippe Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title | Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title_full | Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title_fullStr | Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title_short | Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes |
title_sort | different ways of doing the same: variations in the two last steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway in prokaryotes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6486802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30785193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evz035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costabrandaocruzdennifier differentwaysofdoingthesamevariationsinthetwolaststepsofthepurinebiosyntheticpathwayinprokaryotes AT limasantanalenon differentwaysofdoingthesamevariationsinthetwolaststepsofthepurinebiosyntheticpathwayinprokaryotes AT siqueiraguedesalexandre differentwaysofdoingthesamevariationsinthetwolaststepsofthepurinebiosyntheticpathwayinprokaryotes AT teodorodesouzajorge differentwaysofdoingthesamevariationsinthetwolaststepsofthepurinebiosyntheticpathwayinprokaryotes AT arthursantosmarbachphellippe differentwaysofdoingthesamevariationsinthetwolaststepsofthepurinebiosyntheticpathwayinprokaryotes |