Cargando…

Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakrzewski, Falk, Gieldon, Laura, Rump, Andreas, Seifert, Michael, Grützmann, Konrad, Krüger, Alexander, Loos, Sina, Zeugner, Silke, Hackmann, Karl, Porrmann, Joseph, Wagner, Johannes, Kast, Karin, Wimberger, Pauline, Baretton, Gustavo, Schröck, Evelin, Aust, Daniela, Klink, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31029168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6
_version_ 1783414424120328192
author Zakrzewski, Falk
Gieldon, Laura
Rump, Andreas
Seifert, Michael
Grützmann, Konrad
Krüger, Alexander
Loos, Sina
Zeugner, Silke
Hackmann, Karl
Porrmann, Joseph
Wagner, Johannes
Kast, Karin
Wimberger, Pauline
Baretton, Gustavo
Schröck, Evelin
Aust, Daniela
Klink, Barbara
author_facet Zakrzewski, Falk
Gieldon, Laura
Rump, Andreas
Seifert, Michael
Grützmann, Konrad
Krüger, Alexander
Loos, Sina
Zeugner, Silke
Hackmann, Karl
Porrmann, Joseph
Wagner, Johannes
Kast, Karin
Wimberger, Pauline
Baretton, Gustavo
Schröck, Evelin
Aust, Daniela
Klink, Barbara
author_sort Zakrzewski, Falk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containing fragmented and chemically modified DNA of minor quality, are available. Thus, multiplex PCR-based sequencing is most commonly applied in routine molecular testing, which is predominantly focused on the identification of known hot spot mutations in oncogenes. METHODS: We compared the overall performance of an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol and a multiplex PCR-based approach for calling of pathogenic SNVs and InDels using DNA extracted from 13 FFPE tissue samples. We further applied both strategies to seven blood samples and five matched FFPE tumor tissues of patients with known germline exon-spanning deletions and gene-wide duplications in BRCA1/2 to evaluate CNV detection based solely on panel NGS data. Finally, we analyzed DNA from FFPE tissues of 11 index patients from families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, of whom no blood samples were available for testing, in order to identify underlying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: The multiplex PCR-based protocol produced inhomogeneous coverage among targets of each sample and between samples as well as sporadic amplicon drop out, leading to insufficiently or non-covered nucleotides, which subsequently hindered variant detection. This protocol further led to detection of PCR-artifacts that could easily have been misinterpreted as pathogenic mutations. No such limitations were observed by application of an adjusted targeted capture-based protocol, which allowed for CNV calling with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All pathogenic CNVs were confirmed in the five matched FFPE tumor samples from patients carrying known pathogenic germline mutations and we additionally identified somatic loss of the second allele in BRCA1/2. Furthermore we detected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in four the eleven FFPE samples from patients of whom no blood was available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol is superior to commonly applied multiplex PCR-based protocols for reliable BRCA1/2 variant detection, including CNV-detection, using FFPE tumor samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64870252019-05-06 Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples Zakrzewski, Falk Gieldon, Laura Rump, Andreas Seifert, Michael Grützmann, Konrad Krüger, Alexander Loos, Sina Zeugner, Silke Hackmann, Karl Porrmann, Joseph Wagner, Johannes Kast, Karin Wimberger, Pauline Baretton, Gustavo Schröck, Evelin Aust, Daniela Klink, Barbara BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containing fragmented and chemically modified DNA of minor quality, are available. Thus, multiplex PCR-based sequencing is most commonly applied in routine molecular testing, which is predominantly focused on the identification of known hot spot mutations in oncogenes. METHODS: We compared the overall performance of an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol and a multiplex PCR-based approach for calling of pathogenic SNVs and InDels using DNA extracted from 13 FFPE tissue samples. We further applied both strategies to seven blood samples and five matched FFPE tumor tissues of patients with known germline exon-spanning deletions and gene-wide duplications in BRCA1/2 to evaluate CNV detection based solely on panel NGS data. Finally, we analyzed DNA from FFPE tissues of 11 index patients from families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, of whom no blood samples were available for testing, in order to identify underlying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: The multiplex PCR-based protocol produced inhomogeneous coverage among targets of each sample and between samples as well as sporadic amplicon drop out, leading to insufficiently or non-covered nucleotides, which subsequently hindered variant detection. This protocol further led to detection of PCR-artifacts that could easily have been misinterpreted as pathogenic mutations. No such limitations were observed by application of an adjusted targeted capture-based protocol, which allowed for CNV calling with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All pathogenic CNVs were confirmed in the five matched FFPE tumor samples from patients carrying known pathogenic germline mutations and we additionally identified somatic loss of the second allele in BRCA1/2. Furthermore we detected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in four the eleven FFPE samples from patients of whom no blood was available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol is superior to commonly applied multiplex PCR-based protocols for reliable BRCA1/2 variant detection, including CNV-detection, using FFPE tumor samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6487025/ /pubmed/31029168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Zakrzewski, Falk
Gieldon, Laura
Rump, Andreas
Seifert, Michael
Grützmann, Konrad
Krüger, Alexander
Loos, Sina
Zeugner, Silke
Hackmann, Karl
Porrmann, Joseph
Wagner, Johannes
Kast, Karin
Wimberger, Pauline
Baretton, Gustavo
Schröck, Evelin
Aust, Daniela
Klink, Barbara
Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title_full Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title_fullStr Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title_full_unstemmed Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title_short Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
title_sort targeted capture-based ngs is superior to multiplex pcr-based ngs for hereditary brca1 and brca2 gene analysis in ffpe tumor samples
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31029168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zakrzewskifalk targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT gieldonlaura targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT rumpandreas targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT seifertmichael targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT grutzmannkonrad targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT krugeralexander targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT loossina targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT zeugnersilke targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT hackmannkarl targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT porrmannjoseph targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT wagnerjohannes targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT kastkarin targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT wimbergerpauline targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT barettongustavo targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT schrockevelin targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT austdaniela targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples
AT klinkbarbara targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples