Cargando…
Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31029168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6 |
_version_ | 1783414424120328192 |
---|---|
author | Zakrzewski, Falk Gieldon, Laura Rump, Andreas Seifert, Michael Grützmann, Konrad Krüger, Alexander Loos, Sina Zeugner, Silke Hackmann, Karl Porrmann, Joseph Wagner, Johannes Kast, Karin Wimberger, Pauline Baretton, Gustavo Schröck, Evelin Aust, Daniela Klink, Barbara |
author_facet | Zakrzewski, Falk Gieldon, Laura Rump, Andreas Seifert, Michael Grützmann, Konrad Krüger, Alexander Loos, Sina Zeugner, Silke Hackmann, Karl Porrmann, Joseph Wagner, Johannes Kast, Karin Wimberger, Pauline Baretton, Gustavo Schröck, Evelin Aust, Daniela Klink, Barbara |
author_sort | Zakrzewski, Falk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containing fragmented and chemically modified DNA of minor quality, are available. Thus, multiplex PCR-based sequencing is most commonly applied in routine molecular testing, which is predominantly focused on the identification of known hot spot mutations in oncogenes. METHODS: We compared the overall performance of an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol and a multiplex PCR-based approach for calling of pathogenic SNVs and InDels using DNA extracted from 13 FFPE tissue samples. We further applied both strategies to seven blood samples and five matched FFPE tumor tissues of patients with known germline exon-spanning deletions and gene-wide duplications in BRCA1/2 to evaluate CNV detection based solely on panel NGS data. Finally, we analyzed DNA from FFPE tissues of 11 index patients from families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, of whom no blood samples were available for testing, in order to identify underlying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: The multiplex PCR-based protocol produced inhomogeneous coverage among targets of each sample and between samples as well as sporadic amplicon drop out, leading to insufficiently or non-covered nucleotides, which subsequently hindered variant detection. This protocol further led to detection of PCR-artifacts that could easily have been misinterpreted as pathogenic mutations. No such limitations were observed by application of an adjusted targeted capture-based protocol, which allowed for CNV calling with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All pathogenic CNVs were confirmed in the five matched FFPE tumor samples from patients carrying known pathogenic germline mutations and we additionally identified somatic loss of the second allele in BRCA1/2. Furthermore we detected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in four the eleven FFPE samples from patients of whom no blood was available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol is superior to commonly applied multiplex PCR-based protocols for reliable BRCA1/2 variant detection, including CNV-detection, using FFPE tumor samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6487025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64870252019-05-06 Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples Zakrzewski, Falk Gieldon, Laura Rump, Andreas Seifert, Michael Grützmann, Konrad Krüger, Alexander Loos, Sina Zeugner, Silke Hackmann, Karl Porrmann, Joseph Wagner, Johannes Kast, Karin Wimberger, Pauline Baretton, Gustavo Schröck, Evelin Aust, Daniela Klink, Barbara BMC Cancer Technical Advance BACKGROUND: With the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containing fragmented and chemically modified DNA of minor quality, are available. Thus, multiplex PCR-based sequencing is most commonly applied in routine molecular testing, which is predominantly focused on the identification of known hot spot mutations in oncogenes. METHODS: We compared the overall performance of an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol and a multiplex PCR-based approach for calling of pathogenic SNVs and InDels using DNA extracted from 13 FFPE tissue samples. We further applied both strategies to seven blood samples and five matched FFPE tumor tissues of patients with known germline exon-spanning deletions and gene-wide duplications in BRCA1/2 to evaluate CNV detection based solely on panel NGS data. Finally, we analyzed DNA from FFPE tissues of 11 index patients from families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, of whom no blood samples were available for testing, in order to identify underlying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS: The multiplex PCR-based protocol produced inhomogeneous coverage among targets of each sample and between samples as well as sporadic amplicon drop out, leading to insufficiently or non-covered nucleotides, which subsequently hindered variant detection. This protocol further led to detection of PCR-artifacts that could easily have been misinterpreted as pathogenic mutations. No such limitations were observed by application of an adjusted targeted capture-based protocol, which allowed for CNV calling with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All pathogenic CNVs were confirmed in the five matched FFPE tumor samples from patients carrying known pathogenic germline mutations and we additionally identified somatic loss of the second allele in BRCA1/2. Furthermore we detected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in four the eleven FFPE samples from patients of whom no blood was available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol is superior to commonly applied multiplex PCR-based protocols for reliable BRCA1/2 variant detection, including CNV-detection, using FFPE tumor samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6487025/ /pubmed/31029168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Advance Zakrzewski, Falk Gieldon, Laura Rump, Andreas Seifert, Michael Grützmann, Konrad Krüger, Alexander Loos, Sina Zeugner, Silke Hackmann, Karl Porrmann, Joseph Wagner, Johannes Kast, Karin Wimberger, Pauline Baretton, Gustavo Schröck, Evelin Aust, Daniela Klink, Barbara Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title | Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title_full | Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title_fullStr | Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title_short | Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples |
title_sort | targeted capture-based ngs is superior to multiplex pcr-based ngs for hereditary brca1 and brca2 gene analysis in ffpe tumor samples |
topic | Technical Advance |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31029168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5584-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakrzewskifalk targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT gieldonlaura targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT rumpandreas targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT seifertmichael targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT grutzmannkonrad targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT krugeralexander targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT loossina targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT zeugnersilke targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT hackmannkarl targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT porrmannjoseph targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT wagnerjohannes targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT kastkarin targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT wimbergerpauline targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT barettongustavo targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT schrockevelin targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT austdaniela targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples AT klinkbarbara targetedcapturebasedngsissuperiortomultiplexpcrbasedngsforhereditarybrca1andbrca2geneanalysisinffpetumorsamples |