Cargando…
Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985286 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887 |
_version_ | 1783414482138038272 |
---|---|
author | Lanssens, Dorien Vandenberk, Thijs Lodewijckx, Joy Peeters, Tessa Storms, Valerie Thijs, Inge M Grieten, Lars Gyselaers, Wilfried |
author_facet | Lanssens, Dorien Vandenberk, Thijs Lodewijckx, Joy Peeters, Tessa Storms, Valerie Thijs, Inge M Grieten, Lars Gyselaers, Wilfried |
author_sort | Lanssens, Dorien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study. METHODS: We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question. RESULTS: A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03246737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246737 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76KVnHSYY) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6487343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64873432019-05-08 Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey Lanssens, Dorien Vandenberk, Thijs Lodewijckx, Joy Peeters, Tessa Storms, Valerie Thijs, Inge M Grieten, Lars Gyselaers, Wilfried J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study. METHODS: We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question. RESULTS: A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03246737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246737 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76KVnHSYY) JMIR Publications 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6487343/ /pubmed/30985286 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887 Text en ©Dorien Lanssens, Thijs Vandenberk, Joy Lodewijckx, Tessa Peeters, Valerie Storms, Inge M Thijs, Lars Grieten, Wilfried Gyselaers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.04.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lanssens, Dorien Vandenberk, Thijs Lodewijckx, Joy Peeters, Tessa Storms, Valerie Thijs, Inge M Grieten, Lars Gyselaers, Wilfried Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title | Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title_full | Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title_fullStr | Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title_short | Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey |
title_sort | midwives’, obstetricians’, and recently delivered mothers’ perceptions of remote monitoring for prenatal care: retrospective survey |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985286 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanssensdorien midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT vandenberkthijs midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT lodewijckxjoy midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT peeterstessa midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT stormsvalerie midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT thijsingem midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT grietenlars midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey AT gyselaerswilfried midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey |