Cargando…

Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey

BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanssens, Dorien, Vandenberk, Thijs, Lodewijckx, Joy, Peeters, Tessa, Storms, Valerie, Thijs, Inge M, Grieten, Lars, Gyselaers, Wilfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985286
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887
_version_ 1783414482138038272
author Lanssens, Dorien
Vandenberk, Thijs
Lodewijckx, Joy
Peeters, Tessa
Storms, Valerie
Thijs, Inge M
Grieten, Lars
Gyselaers, Wilfried
author_facet Lanssens, Dorien
Vandenberk, Thijs
Lodewijckx, Joy
Peeters, Tessa
Storms, Valerie
Thijs, Inge M
Grieten, Lars
Gyselaers, Wilfried
author_sort Lanssens, Dorien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study. METHODS: We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question. RESULTS: A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03246737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246737 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76KVnHSYY)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64873432019-05-08 Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey Lanssens, Dorien Vandenberk, Thijs Lodewijckx, Joy Peeters, Tessa Storms, Valerie Thijs, Inge M Grieten, Lars Gyselaers, Wilfried J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The Pregnancy Remote Monitoring (PREMOM) study enrolled pregnant women at increased risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and investigated the effect of remote monitoring in addition to their prenatal follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the perceptions and experiences of remote monitoring among mothers, midwives, and obstetricians who participated in the PREMOM study. METHODS: We developed specific questionnaires for the mothers, midwives, and obstetricians addressing 5 domains: (1) prior knowledge and experience of remote monitoring, (2) reactions to abnormal values, (3) privacy, (4) quality and patient safety, and (5) financial aspects. We also questioned the health care providers about which issues they considered important when implementing remote monitoring. We used a 5-point Likert scale to provide objective scores. It was possible to add free-text feedback at every question. RESULTS: A total of 91 participants completed the questionnaires. The mothers, midwives, and obstetricians reported positive experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring, although most of them had no or little prior experience with this technology. They supported a further rollout of remote monitoring in Belgium. Nearly three-quarters of the mothers (34/47, 72%) did not report any problems with taking the measurements at the required times. Almost half of the mothers (19/47, 40%) wanted to be contacted within 3 to 12 hours after abnormal measurement values, preferably by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: Although most of midwives and obstetricians had no or very little experience with remote monitoring before enrolling in the PREMOM study, they reported, based on their one-year experience, that remote monitoring was an important component in the follow-up of high-risk pregnancies and would recommend it to their colleagues and pregnant patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03246737; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246737 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76KVnHSYY) JMIR Publications 2019-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6487343/ /pubmed/30985286 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887 Text en ©Dorien Lanssens, Thijs Vandenberk, Joy Lodewijckx, Tessa Peeters, Valerie Storms, Inge M Thijs, Lars Grieten, Wilfried Gyselaers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.04.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lanssens, Dorien
Vandenberk, Thijs
Lodewijckx, Joy
Peeters, Tessa
Storms, Valerie
Thijs, Inge M
Grieten, Lars
Gyselaers, Wilfried
Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title_full Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title_fullStr Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title_full_unstemmed Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title_short Midwives’, Obstetricians’, and Recently Delivered Mothers’ Perceptions of Remote Monitoring for Prenatal Care: Retrospective Survey
title_sort midwives’, obstetricians’, and recently delivered mothers’ perceptions of remote monitoring for prenatal care: retrospective survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30985286
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/10887
work_keys_str_mv AT lanssensdorien midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT vandenberkthijs midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT lodewijckxjoy midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT peeterstessa midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT stormsvalerie midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT thijsingem midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT grietenlars midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey
AT gyselaerswilfried midwivesobstetriciansandrecentlydeliveredmothersperceptionsofremotemonitoringforprenatalcareretrospectivesurvey