Cargando…

Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgical resection is a standard treatment for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction; however, the procedure is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Although a bridge to surgery can be created to obviate the need for emergency surgery, its effects on long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Yoshiyuki, Moritani, Konosuke, Seo, Yuki, Takahashi, Takayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i16.1975
_version_ 1783414491706294272
author Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
Moritani, Konosuke
Seo, Yuki
Takahashi, Takayuki
author_facet Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
Moritani, Konosuke
Seo, Yuki
Takahashi, Takayuki
author_sort Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency surgical resection is a standard treatment for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction; however, the procedure is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Although a bridge to surgery can be created to obviate the need for emergency surgery, its effects on long-term outcomes and the most practical management strategies for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction remain unclear. AIM: To determine the appropriate management approach for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. METHODS: Forty patients with right-sided malignant colonic obstruction who underwent curative resection from January 2007 to April 2017 were included in the study. We compared the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who received bridges to surgery established using decompression tubes and those created using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). The primary outcome was the overall survival duration (OS) and the secondary endpoints were the disease-free survival (DFS) duration and the preoperative and postoperative morbidity rates. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: There were 21 patients in the decompression tube group and 19 in the SEMS group. There were no significant differences in the perioperative morbidity rates of the two groups. The OS rate was significantly higher in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group (5-year OS rate; decompression tube 79.5%, SEMS 32%, P = 0.043). Multivariate analysis revealed that the bridge to surgery using a decompression tube was significantly associated with the OS (hazard ratio, 17.41; P = 0.004). The 3-year DFS rate was significantly higher in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group (68.9% vs 45.9%; log-rank test, P = 0.032). A propensity score–adjusted analysis also demonstrated that the prognosis was significantly better in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group. CONCLUSION: The bridge to surgery using trans-nasal and trans-anal decompression tubes for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction is safe and may improve long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64873842019-05-13 Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction Suzuki, Yoshiyuki Moritani, Konosuke Seo, Yuki Takahashi, Takayuki World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Emergency surgical resection is a standard treatment for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction; however, the procedure is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Although a bridge to surgery can be created to obviate the need for emergency surgery, its effects on long-term outcomes and the most practical management strategies for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction remain unclear. AIM: To determine the appropriate management approach for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction. METHODS: Forty patients with right-sided malignant colonic obstruction who underwent curative resection from January 2007 to April 2017 were included in the study. We compared the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients who received bridges to surgery established using decompression tubes and those created using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). The primary outcome was the overall survival duration (OS) and the secondary endpoints were the disease-free survival (DFS) duration and the preoperative and postoperative morbidity rates. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: There were 21 patients in the decompression tube group and 19 in the SEMS group. There were no significant differences in the perioperative morbidity rates of the two groups. The OS rate was significantly higher in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group (5-year OS rate; decompression tube 79.5%, SEMS 32%, P = 0.043). Multivariate analysis revealed that the bridge to surgery using a decompression tube was significantly associated with the OS (hazard ratio, 17.41; P = 0.004). The 3-year DFS rate was significantly higher in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group (68.9% vs 45.9%; log-rank test, P = 0.032). A propensity score–adjusted analysis also demonstrated that the prognosis was significantly better in the decompression tube group than in the SEMS group. CONCLUSION: The bridge to surgery using trans-nasal and trans-anal decompression tubes for right-sided malignant colonic obstruction is safe and may improve long-term outcomes. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-04-28 2019-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6487384/ /pubmed/31086465 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i16.1975 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Suzuki, Yoshiyuki
Moritani, Konosuke
Seo, Yuki
Takahashi, Takayuki
Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title_full Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title_fullStr Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title_short Comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
title_sort comparison of decompression tubes with metallic stents for the management of right-sided malignant colonic obstruction
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31086465
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i16.1975
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukiyoshiyuki comparisonofdecompressiontubeswithmetallicstentsforthemanagementofrightsidedmalignantcolonicobstruction
AT moritanikonosuke comparisonofdecompressiontubeswithmetallicstentsforthemanagementofrightsidedmalignantcolonicobstruction
AT seoyuki comparisonofdecompressiontubeswithmetallicstentsforthemanagementofrightsidedmalignantcolonicobstruction
AT takahashitakayuki comparisonofdecompressiontubeswithmetallicstentsforthemanagementofrightsidedmalignantcolonicobstruction