Cargando…

Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them

Health inequalities are a problem in high, middle and low income countries. Most are unfair (‘inequities’) and could be minimised but primarily through policies outside the health service. In the US, the Center for Diseases Control has used high quality, nationally-available data to monitor conditio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mindell, Jennifer S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0307-7
_version_ 1783414515551961088
author Mindell, Jennifer S.
author_facet Mindell, Jennifer S.
author_sort Mindell, Jennifer S.
collection PubMed
description Health inequalities are a problem in high, middle and low income countries. Most are unfair (‘inequities’) and could be minimised but primarily through policies outside the health service. In the US, the Center for Diseases Control has used high quality, nationally-available data to monitor conditions and determinants of health among different groups (by sex, disability, race, ethnicity, and language) to motivate action to reduce inequalities. In the UK, the 10 top level ‘health’ indicators in London at the turn of the millennium included unemployment, education, housing quality, crime, air pollution, road travel injuries, as well as traditional health measures. Most of these affect mental and physical health through social determinants or adverse environmental exposures. Current inequalities monitoring in England includes a Local Basket of Inequalities Indicators focusing on a wide range of determinants of health as well as traditional health metrics. Israel, like the US, has above average socio-economic inequalities but has universal healthcare. Health inequalities in Israel occur within different Jewish groups and by income, education, ethnicity, and religion, with disadvantages often clustering. Current monitoring in Israel focuses on health outcomes and ‘midstream’ healthcare-related provision. I agree with Abu-Saad and her colleagues that including monitoring of social determinants of health is crucial to identify and tackle health inequalities in Israel. National, ‘upstream’, interventions are the most effective ways to reduce inequalities and improve the population’s health. High-level political support is crucial for this. While a ‘Health in all Policies’ approach combined with political will to ‘leave no one behind’ can lead to great improvements, regular monitoring is essential, to: identify the inequities; plan appropriate and effective, targeted interventions; implement and evaluate them; and change them where needed. All of this requires adequate and timely data on health and its determinants, including information about undiagnosed and poorly controlled disease, obtained from the general population not just those attending for healthcare, analysed for each population sub-group at risk of experiencing inequalities. This is a commentary on 10.1186/s13584-018-0208-1
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64875252019-06-05 Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them Mindell, Jennifer S. Isr J Health Policy Res Commentary Health inequalities are a problem in high, middle and low income countries. Most are unfair (‘inequities’) and could be minimised but primarily through policies outside the health service. In the US, the Center for Diseases Control has used high quality, nationally-available data to monitor conditions and determinants of health among different groups (by sex, disability, race, ethnicity, and language) to motivate action to reduce inequalities. In the UK, the 10 top level ‘health’ indicators in London at the turn of the millennium included unemployment, education, housing quality, crime, air pollution, road travel injuries, as well as traditional health measures. Most of these affect mental and physical health through social determinants or adverse environmental exposures. Current inequalities monitoring in England includes a Local Basket of Inequalities Indicators focusing on a wide range of determinants of health as well as traditional health metrics. Israel, like the US, has above average socio-economic inequalities but has universal healthcare. Health inequalities in Israel occur within different Jewish groups and by income, education, ethnicity, and religion, with disadvantages often clustering. Current monitoring in Israel focuses on health outcomes and ‘midstream’ healthcare-related provision. I agree with Abu-Saad and her colleagues that including monitoring of social determinants of health is crucial to identify and tackle health inequalities in Israel. National, ‘upstream’, interventions are the most effective ways to reduce inequalities and improve the population’s health. High-level political support is crucial for this. While a ‘Health in all Policies’ approach combined with political will to ‘leave no one behind’ can lead to great improvements, regular monitoring is essential, to: identify the inequities; plan appropriate and effective, targeted interventions; implement and evaluate them; and change them where needed. All of this requires adequate and timely data on health and its determinants, including information about undiagnosed and poorly controlled disease, obtained from the general population not just those attending for healthcare, analysed for each population sub-group at risk of experiencing inequalities. This is a commentary on 10.1186/s13584-018-0208-1 BioMed Central 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6487525/ /pubmed/31036081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0307-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Mindell, Jennifer S.
Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title_full Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title_fullStr Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title_full_unstemmed Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title_short Disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
title_sort disparities, variations, inequalities or inequities: whatever you call them, we need data to monitor them
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31036081
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-019-0307-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mindelljennifers disparitiesvariationsinequalitiesorinequitieswhateveryoucallthemweneeddatatomonitorthem