Cargando…

Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND: A recently introduced classification system of medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears accounting for location and severity has demonstrated high interobserver and intraobserver reliability, but little is known about its clinical utility. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramkumar, Prem N., Haeberle, Heather S., Navarro, Sergio M., Frangiamore, Salvatore J., Farrow, Lutul D., Schickendantz, Mark S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119839785
_version_ 1783414553528238080
author Ramkumar, Prem N.
Haeberle, Heather S.
Navarro, Sergio M.
Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
author_facet Ramkumar, Prem N.
Haeberle, Heather S.
Navarro, Sergio M.
Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
author_sort Ramkumar, Prem N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A recently introduced classification system of medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears accounting for location and severity has demonstrated high interobserver and intraobserver reliability, but little is known about its clinical utility. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based classification system in predicting which athletes had success with nonoperative versus operative treatment after completing a standardized rehabilitation program. A secondary objective included return to play (RTP) and return to prior performance (RPP) analyses of baseball players. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: After an a priori power analysis, 58 consecutive patients with UCL tears and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: those who successfully completed operative treatment and those who completed nonoperative treatment. The MRI-based classification stages accounting for UCL tear location and severity were compared between the nonoperative and operative groups. A subanalysis for baseball players, including RTP and RPP, was performed. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (40 baseball players [34 pitchers]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients 35 (32 baseball players [27 pitchers]) underwent surgery, and 23 (8 baseball players [7 pitchers]) underwent nonoperative management. No patients in the nonoperative arm crossed over to surgery after completing the rehabilitation program. Patients with distal tears (odds ratio, 48.0; P = .0004) and complete tears (odds ratio, 5.4; P = .004) were more likely to undergo surgery. Baseball players, regardless of position, were confounding determinants of operative management, although there was no difference in RTP and RPP between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: A 6-stage MRI-based classification system addressing UCL tear location and severity may help early decision making, as patients likely to fail nonoperative treatment have complete, distal tears, whereas those with proximal, partial tears may be more amenable to nonoperative management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64877712019-05-07 Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study Ramkumar, Prem N. Haeberle, Heather S. Navarro, Sergio M. Frangiamore, Salvatore J. Farrow, Lutul D. Schickendantz, Mark S. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: A recently introduced classification system of medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears accounting for location and severity has demonstrated high interobserver and intraobserver reliability, but little is known about its clinical utility. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based classification system in predicting which athletes had success with nonoperative versus operative treatment after completing a standardized rehabilitation program. A secondary objective included return to play (RTP) and return to prior performance (RPP) analyses of baseball players. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: After an a priori power analysis, 58 consecutive patients with UCL tears and a minimum of 2-year follow-up were retrospectively divided into 2 groups: those who successfully completed operative treatment and those who completed nonoperative treatment. The MRI-based classification stages accounting for UCL tear location and severity were compared between the nonoperative and operative groups. A subanalysis for baseball players, including RTP and RPP, was performed. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients (40 baseball players [34 pitchers]) met inclusion criteria. Of these patients 35 (32 baseball players [27 pitchers]) underwent surgery, and 23 (8 baseball players [7 pitchers]) underwent nonoperative management. No patients in the nonoperative arm crossed over to surgery after completing the rehabilitation program. Patients with distal tears (odds ratio, 48.0; P = .0004) and complete tears (odds ratio, 5.4; P = .004) were more likely to undergo surgery. Baseball players, regardless of position, were confounding determinants of operative management, although there was no difference in RTP and RPP between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: A 6-stage MRI-based classification system addressing UCL tear location and severity may help early decision making, as patients likely to fail nonoperative treatment have complete, distal tears, whereas those with proximal, partial tears may be more amenable to nonoperative management. SAGE Publications 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6487771/ /pubmed/31065552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119839785 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Ramkumar, Prem N.
Haeberle, Heather S.
Navarro, Sergio M.
Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
Farrow, Lutul D.
Schickendantz, Mark S.
Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title_full Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title_fullStr Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title_short Clinical Utility of an MRI-Based Classification System for Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tears: A 2-Year Follow-up Study
title_sort clinical utility of an mri-based classification system for operative versus nonoperative management of ulnar collateral ligament tears: a 2-year follow-up study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119839785
work_keys_str_mv AT ramkumarpremn clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy
AT haeberleheathers clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy
AT navarrosergiom clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy
AT frangiamoresalvatorej clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy
AT farrowlutuld clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy
AT schickendantzmarks clinicalutilityofanmribasedclassificationsystemforoperativeversusnonoperativemanagementofulnarcollateralligamenttearsa2yearfollowupstudy