Cargando…
Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of consid...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973 |
_version_ | 1783414578139365376 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Michael S. C. Ansari, Daniel Knowland, Victoria C. P. |
author_facet | Thomas, Michael S. C. Ansari, Daniel Knowland, Victoria C. P. |
author_sort | Thomas, Michael S. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn (‘brain health’); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6487963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64879632019-05-06 Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects Thomas, Michael S. C. Ansari, Daniel Knowland, Victoria C. P. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Annual Research Reviews Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn (‘brain health’); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-22 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6487963/ /pubmed/30345518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Annual Research Reviews Thomas, Michael S. C. Ansari, Daniel Knowland, Victoria C. P. Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title | Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title_full | Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title_fullStr | Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title_full_unstemmed | Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title_short | Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
title_sort | annual research review: educational neuroscience: progress and prospects |
topic | Annual Research Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasmichaelsc annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects AT ansaridaniel annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects AT knowlandvictoriacp annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects |