Cargando…

Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects

Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of consid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Michael S. C., Ansari, Daniel, Knowland, Victoria C. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
_version_ 1783414578139365376
author Thomas, Michael S. C.
Ansari, Daniel
Knowland, Victoria C. P.
author_facet Thomas, Michael S. C.
Ansari, Daniel
Knowland, Victoria C. P.
author_sort Thomas, Michael S. C.
collection PubMed
description Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn (‘brain health’); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6487963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64879632019-05-06 Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects Thomas, Michael S. C. Ansari, Daniel Knowland, Victoria C. P. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Annual Research Reviews Educational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary research field that seeks to translate research findings on neural mechanisms of learning to educational practice and policy and to understand the effects of education on the brain. Neuroscience and education can interact directly, by virtue of considering the brain as a biological organ that needs to be in the optimal condition to learn (‘brain health’); or indirectly, as neuroscience shapes psychological theory and psychology influences education. In this article, we trace the origins of educational neuroscience, its main areas of research activity and the principal challenges it faces as a translational field. We consider how a pure psychology approach that ignores neuroscience is at risk of being misleading for educators. We address the major criticisms of the field comprising, respectively, a priori arguments against the relevance of neuroscience to education, reservations with the current practical operation of the field, and doubts about the viability of neuroscience methods for diagnosing disorders or predicting individual differences. We consider future prospects of the field and ethical issues it raises. Finally, we discuss the challenge of responding to the (welcome) desire of education policymakers to include neuroscience evidence in their policymaking, while ensuring recommendations do not exceed the limitations of current basic science. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-22 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6487963/ /pubmed/30345518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Annual Research Reviews
Thomas, Michael S. C.
Ansari, Daniel
Knowland, Victoria C. P.
Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title_full Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title_fullStr Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title_full_unstemmed Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title_short Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
title_sort annual research review: educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
topic Annual Research Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6487963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmichaelsc annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects
AT ansaridaniel annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects
AT knowlandvictoriacp annualresearchrevieweducationalneuroscienceprogressandprospects