Cargando…
Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies
OBJECTIVES: The Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire, a sarcopenia-specific patient-reported outcome measure, evaluates quality of life with 55 items. It produces 7 domain scores and 1 overall quality of life score, all between 0 and 100 points. This study aims to contribute to the inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31034498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216065 |
_version_ | 1783414596862738432 |
---|---|
author | Geerinck, Anton Alekna, Vidmantas Beaudart, Charlotte Bautmans, Ivan Cooper, Cyrus De Souza Orlandi, Fabiana Konstantynowicz, Jerzy Montero-Errasquín, Beatriz Topinková, Eva Tsekoura, Maria Reginster, Jean-Yves Bruyère, Olivier |
author_facet | Geerinck, Anton Alekna, Vidmantas Beaudart, Charlotte Bautmans, Ivan Cooper, Cyrus De Souza Orlandi, Fabiana Konstantynowicz, Jerzy Montero-Errasquín, Beatriz Topinková, Eva Tsekoura, Maria Reginster, Jean-Yves Bruyère, Olivier |
author_sort | Geerinck, Anton |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire, a sarcopenia-specific patient-reported outcome measure, evaluates quality of life with 55 items. It produces 7 domain scores and 1 overall quality of life score, all between 0 and 100 points. This study aims to contribute to the interpretation of the SarQoL scores by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) in a sample of subjects from 9 studies. METHODS: Subjects from 9 studies (conducted in Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, England, Greece, Lithuania, Poland and Spain) were included. The SEM, a measure of the error in the scores that is not due to true changes, was calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the difference between test and retest scores (SDdiff) by √2. The SDC, defined as change beyond measurement error, was calculated by multiplying SDdiff by 1.96. Bland-Altman plots were assessed for the presence of systematic errors. RESULTS: A total of 278 sarcopenic subjects, aged 77.67 ± 7.64 years and 61.5% women, were included. The SEM for the overall SarQoL score ranged from 0.18 to 4.20 points for the individual studies, and was 2.65 points when all subjects were analyzed together. The SDC for the overall score ranged from 0.49 to 11.65 points for the individual studies, and was 7.35 points for all subjects. The Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic errors in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, for individual subjects, a change in overall quality of life of at least 7.35 points (on a scale from 0 to 100) would have to be observed to confirm that a true change, beyond measurement error, has occurred. It also demonstrated that the SarQoL questionnaire is a precise instrument, with the observed scores within less than 3 points of the theoretical “true score”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6488089 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64880892019-05-17 Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies Geerinck, Anton Alekna, Vidmantas Beaudart, Charlotte Bautmans, Ivan Cooper, Cyrus De Souza Orlandi, Fabiana Konstantynowicz, Jerzy Montero-Errasquín, Beatriz Topinková, Eva Tsekoura, Maria Reginster, Jean-Yves Bruyère, Olivier PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire, a sarcopenia-specific patient-reported outcome measure, evaluates quality of life with 55 items. It produces 7 domain scores and 1 overall quality of life score, all between 0 and 100 points. This study aims to contribute to the interpretation of the SarQoL scores by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) in a sample of subjects from 9 studies. METHODS: Subjects from 9 studies (conducted in Belgium, Brazil, Czech Republic, England, Greece, Lithuania, Poland and Spain) were included. The SEM, a measure of the error in the scores that is not due to true changes, was calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the difference between test and retest scores (SDdiff) by √2. The SDC, defined as change beyond measurement error, was calculated by multiplying SDdiff by 1.96. Bland-Altman plots were assessed for the presence of systematic errors. RESULTS: A total of 278 sarcopenic subjects, aged 77.67 ± 7.64 years and 61.5% women, were included. The SEM for the overall SarQoL score ranged from 0.18 to 4.20 points for the individual studies, and was 2.65 points when all subjects were analyzed together. The SDC for the overall score ranged from 0.49 to 11.65 points for the individual studies, and was 7.35 points for all subjects. The Bland-Altman plots revealed no systematic errors in the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: This study shows that, for individual subjects, a change in overall quality of life of at least 7.35 points (on a scale from 0 to 100) would have to be observed to confirm that a true change, beyond measurement error, has occurred. It also demonstrated that the SarQoL questionnaire is a precise instrument, with the observed scores within less than 3 points of the theoretical “true score”. Public Library of Science 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6488089/ /pubmed/31034498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216065 Text en © 2019 Geerinck et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Geerinck, Anton Alekna, Vidmantas Beaudart, Charlotte Bautmans, Ivan Cooper, Cyrus De Souza Orlandi, Fabiana Konstantynowicz, Jerzy Montero-Errasquín, Beatriz Topinková, Eva Tsekoura, Maria Reginster, Jean-Yves Bruyère, Olivier Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title | Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title_full | Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title_fullStr | Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title_short | Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: An analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
title_sort | standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the sarcopenia quality of life (sarqol) questionnaire: an analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488089/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31034498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geerinckanton standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT aleknavidmantas standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT beaudartcharlotte standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT bautmansivan standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT coopercyrus standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT desouzaorlandifabiana standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT konstantynowiczjerzy standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT monteroerrasquinbeatriz standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT topinkovaeva standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT tsekouramaria standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT reginsterjeanyves standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies AT bruyereolivier standarderrorofmeasurementandsmallestdetectablechangeofthesarcopeniaqualityoflifesarqolquestionnaireananalysisofsubjectsfrom9validationstudies |