Cargando…

Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Tumor deposit (TD) was associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic and staging value in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo‐CRT) is controversial. Four hundred and ninety‐five LARC patients following neo‐CRT and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yaqi, Zhang, Jing, Zhou, Menglong, Yang, Lifeng, Wan, Juefeng, Shen, Lijun, Liang, Liping, Yao, Ye, Zhang, Hui, Zhang, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2034
_version_ 1783414606398488576
author Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Jing
Zhou, Menglong
Yang, Lifeng
Wan, Juefeng
Shen, Lijun
Liang, Liping
Yao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Zhen
author_facet Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Jing
Zhou, Menglong
Yang, Lifeng
Wan, Juefeng
Shen, Lijun
Liang, Liping
Yao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Zhen
author_sort Wang, Yaqi
collection PubMed
description Tumor deposit (TD) was associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic and staging value in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo‐CRT) is controversial. Four hundred and ninety‐five LARC patients following neo‐CRT and surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression in all lymph node (LN) ‐negative and LN‐positive patients. Next, we used three methods to classify the counts of LNs and TDs (oN, only LN counts; n1N, counts according to the N1c standards; n2N, total counts of LNs and TDs) to evaluate the impact of TD on N staging. TD‐positive patients were associated with more aggressive clinicopathological features. In multivariate analyses, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and local recurrence‐free survival in all patients. In LN‐negative patients, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of OS, DFS and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). In LN‐positive patients, TD has poor prognostic value only in patients with one positive LN. Three multivariate analyses according to three N staging methods showed that oN was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas n1N and n2N were independently associated with poor survival in OS, DFS and DMFS. The n2N method seemed to be better than n1N method. TD is an independent poor prognostic factor in LARC patients following neo‐CRT, especially in patients with no more than one positive LN. TD probably should be considered as one positive LN when performing N staging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6488131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64881312019-05-23 Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Wang, Yaqi Zhang, Jing Zhou, Menglong Yang, Lifeng Wan, Juefeng Shen, Lijun Liang, Liping Yao, Ye Zhang, Hui Zhang, Zhen Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Tumor deposit (TD) was associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer. However, its prognostic and staging value in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo‐CRT) is controversial. Four hundred and ninety‐five LARC patients following neo‐CRT and surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression in all lymph node (LN) ‐negative and LN‐positive patients. Next, we used three methods to classify the counts of LNs and TDs (oN, only LN counts; n1N, counts according to the N1c standards; n2N, total counts of LNs and TDs) to evaluate the impact of TD on N staging. TD‐positive patients were associated with more aggressive clinicopathological features. In multivariate analyses, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of overall survival (OS), disease‐free survival (DFS), and local recurrence‐free survival in all patients. In LN‐negative patients, TD was an independent poor prognostic factor of OS, DFS and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS). In LN‐positive patients, TD has poor prognostic value only in patients with one positive LN. Three multivariate analyses according to three N staging methods showed that oN was not an independent prognostic factor, whereas n1N and n2N were independently associated with poor survival in OS, DFS and DMFS. The n2N method seemed to be better than n1N method. TD is an independent poor prognostic factor in LARC patients following neo‐CRT, especially in patients with no more than one positive LN. TD probably should be considered as one positive LN when performing N staging. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6488131/ /pubmed/30790459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2034 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Wang, Yaqi
Zhang, Jing
Zhou, Menglong
Yang, Lifeng
Wan, Juefeng
Shen, Lijun
Liang, Liping
Yao, Ye
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Zhen
Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_short Poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_sort poor prognostic and staging value of tumor deposit in locally advanced rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30790459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2034
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyaqi poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zhangjing poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zhoumenglong poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT yanglifeng poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT wanjuefeng poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT shenlijun poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT liangliping poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT yaoye poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zhanghui poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zhangzhen poorprognosticandstagingvalueoftumordepositinlocallyadvancedrectalcancerwithneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy