Cargando…

Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards

BACKGROUND: Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, valid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakobsson, Max, Gutke, Annelie, Mokkink, Lidwine B, Smeets, Rob, Lundberg, Mari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30566577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy159
_version_ 1783414646633398272
author Jakobsson, Max
Gutke, Annelie
Mokkink, Lidwine B
Smeets, Rob
Lundberg, Mari
author_facet Jakobsson, Max
Gutke, Annelie
Mokkink, Lidwine B
Smeets, Rob
Lundberg, Mari
author_sort Jakobsson, Max
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. STUDY SELECTION: Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT: One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. DATA SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS: Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (∼15.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed “Up & Go” tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed “Up & Go” tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. LIMITATIONS: The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed “Up & Go,” and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6488491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64884912019-05-02 Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards Jakobsson, Max Gutke, Annelie Mokkink, Lidwine B Smeets, Rob Lundberg, Mari Phys Ther Review BACKGROUND: Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. STUDY SELECTION: Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT: One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. DATA SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS: Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (∼15.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed “Up & Go” tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed “Up & Go” tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. LIMITATIONS: The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed “Up & Go,” and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice. Oxford University Press 2019-04 2018-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6488491/ /pubmed/30566577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy159 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jakobsson, Max
Gutke, Annelie
Mokkink, Lidwine B
Smeets, Rob
Lundberg, Mari
Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title_full Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title_fullStr Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title_full_unstemmed Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title_short Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards
title_sort level of evidence for reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks designed to assess functioning in patients with low back pain: a systematic review using the cosmin standards
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6488491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30566577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy159
work_keys_str_mv AT jakobssonmax levelofevidenceforreliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofphysicalcapacitytasksdesignedtoassessfunctioninginpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicreviewusingthecosminstandards
AT gutkeannelie levelofevidenceforreliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofphysicalcapacitytasksdesignedtoassessfunctioninginpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicreviewusingthecosminstandards
AT mokkinklidwineb levelofevidenceforreliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofphysicalcapacitytasksdesignedtoassessfunctioninginpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicreviewusingthecosminstandards
AT smeetsrob levelofevidenceforreliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofphysicalcapacitytasksdesignedtoassessfunctioninginpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicreviewusingthecosminstandards
AT lundbergmari levelofevidenceforreliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofphysicalcapacitytasksdesignedtoassessfunctioninginpatientswithlowbackpainasystematicreviewusingthecosminstandards