Cargando…
Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa
BACKGROUND: Costly prescription medicines with existing cheaper alternatives tend to be purchased by medically insured consumers of healthcare. In South Africa medical scheme members pay higher out-of-pocket payments for medicines than those without insurance. AIM: This study explored reasons for co...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6489420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038333 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1878 |
_version_ | 1783414822799409152 |
---|---|
author | Mpanza, Ntobeko M. Bradley, Hazel Laing, Richard |
author_facet | Mpanza, Ntobeko M. Bradley, Hazel Laing, Richard |
author_sort | Mpanza, Ntobeko M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Costly prescription medicines with existing cheaper alternatives tend to be purchased by medically insured consumers of healthcare. In South Africa medical scheme members pay higher out-of-pocket payments for medicines than those without insurance. AIM: This study explored reasons for co-payments among insured Pretoria medical scheme members purchasing prescription medicines at private retail pharmacies, despite being insured and protected against such payments. SETTING: The study took place in retail pharmacies in Pretoria, Gauteng Province, South Africa. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was performed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among purposefully sampled medical scheme members (12) and nine key informants (six pharmacists and three regulators – one for the pharmaceutical industry, one for medical schemes and one for pharmacists). Three pharmacies (two corporate and one independent) each were identified from high and low socio-economic areas. Scheme members were interviewed immediately after having made a co-payment (eight) or no co-payment (four) from the selected pharmacies. Interviews were recorded, coded and organised into themes. RESULTS: Co-payments were deemed confusing, unpredictable and inconsistent between and within pharmacies. Members blamed schemes for causing co-payments. Six sampled pharmacies rarely stocked the lowest-priced medicines; instead, they dispensed medicines from manufacturers with whom they had a relationship. Corporate pharmacies were favoured compared to independents and brand loyalty superseded cost considerations. Medical scheme members did not understand how medical schemes’ function. CONCLUSION: Unavailability of lowest-priced medicines at pharmacies contributes to co-payments. Consumer education about generics and expedited implementation of National Health Insurance could significantly reduce co-payments. KEYWORDS: co-payments; high socio-economic; low socio-economic; medical scheme; medicines pricing policy; National Health Insurance; pharmacist; prescribed minimum benefit; retail pharmacy; regulator. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6489420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64894202019-05-02 Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa Mpanza, Ntobeko M. Bradley, Hazel Laing, Richard Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Costly prescription medicines with existing cheaper alternatives tend to be purchased by medically insured consumers of healthcare. In South Africa medical scheme members pay higher out-of-pocket payments for medicines than those without insurance. AIM: This study explored reasons for co-payments among insured Pretoria medical scheme members purchasing prescription medicines at private retail pharmacies, despite being insured and protected against such payments. SETTING: The study took place in retail pharmacies in Pretoria, Gauteng Province, South Africa. METHODS: An exploratory qualitative study was performed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among purposefully sampled medical scheme members (12) and nine key informants (six pharmacists and three regulators – one for the pharmaceutical industry, one for medical schemes and one for pharmacists). Three pharmacies (two corporate and one independent) each were identified from high and low socio-economic areas. Scheme members were interviewed immediately after having made a co-payment (eight) or no co-payment (four) from the selected pharmacies. Interviews were recorded, coded and organised into themes. RESULTS: Co-payments were deemed confusing, unpredictable and inconsistent between and within pharmacies. Members blamed schemes for causing co-payments. Six sampled pharmacies rarely stocked the lowest-priced medicines; instead, they dispensed medicines from manufacturers with whom they had a relationship. Corporate pharmacies were favoured compared to independents and brand loyalty superseded cost considerations. Medical scheme members did not understand how medical schemes’ function. CONCLUSION: Unavailability of lowest-priced medicines at pharmacies contributes to co-payments. Consumer education about generics and expedited implementation of National Health Insurance could significantly reduce co-payments. KEYWORDS: co-payments; high socio-economic; low socio-economic; medical scheme; medicines pricing policy; National Health Insurance; pharmacist; prescribed minimum benefit; retail pharmacy; regulator. AOSIS 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6489420/ /pubmed/31038333 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1878 Text en © 2019. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mpanza, Ntobeko M. Bradley, Hazel Laing, Richard Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title | Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title_full | Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title_fullStr | Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title_short | Reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in Pretoria, South Africa |
title_sort | reasons why insured consumers co-pay for medicines at retail pharmacies in pretoria, south africa |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6489420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31038333 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mpanzantobekom reasonswhyinsuredconsumerscopayformedicinesatretailpharmaciesinpretoriasouthafrica AT bradleyhazel reasonswhyinsuredconsumerscopayformedicinesatretailpharmaciesinpretoriasouthafrica AT laingrichard reasonswhyinsuredconsumerscopayformedicinesatretailpharmaciesinpretoriasouthafrica |