Cargando…

A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD

AIM: To provide a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), investigating its validity and reliability in Brazilian patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study for translation and linguist validation of the Portuguese MDP version for patients with COPD. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belo, Letícia F., Rodrigues, Antenor, Vicentin, Ana Paula, Paes, Thaís, de Castro, Larissa Araújo, Hernandes, Nidia A., Pitta, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6490879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31039167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215544
_version_ 1783414893127401472
author Belo, Letícia F.
Rodrigues, Antenor
Vicentin, Ana Paula
Paes, Thaís
de Castro, Larissa Araújo
Hernandes, Nidia A.
Pitta, Fabio
author_facet Belo, Letícia F.
Rodrigues, Antenor
Vicentin, Ana Paula
Paes, Thaís
de Castro, Larissa Araújo
Hernandes, Nidia A.
Pitta, Fabio
author_sort Belo, Letícia F.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To provide a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), investigating its validity and reliability in Brazilian patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study for translation and linguist validation of the Portuguese MDP version for patients with COPD. The process occurred according to the protocol of Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Three scores of MDP were used for the analysis: the immediate unpleasantness of dyspnea (A1); the “immediate perception domain” (S) (sum of A1 plus the sensory descriptors) and the “emotional response domain” (A2) (sum of the emotional descriptors). The questionnaires COPD assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) and Medical Research Council scale (MRC) were used as anchors to investigate MDP’s validity. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concurrent validity was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Thirty patients with moderate-severe COPD were studied for MDP’s validation analysis (43% male, 63±8years, body mass index [BMI] 27±6Kg/m(2), forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV(1)] 48±15%predicted, six-minute walking test [6MWT] 464±84m and 84±16%predicted), whereas 10 patients were excluded from the test-retest reliability analysis due to missing data, resulting in a sample of 20 subjects for this purpose (50% male, 62±8years, BMI 27±6Kg/m(2), FEV(1) 48±15%predicted, 6MWT 452±93m and 82±19%predicted). Both samples were similar regarding general characteristics (P>0,05 for all variables). MDP presented strong correlations, i.e., ICC intra-rater: A1: 0.77 (0.48–0.90), S: 0.78 (0.52–0.91), and A2: 0.85 (0.66–0.94), with high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.86, 0.88 and 0.92 respectively); and ICC inter-rater: A1: 0.74 (0.46–0.89), S: 0.75 (0.48–0.89) and A2: 0.91 (0.78–0.96) with Cronbach's α 0.85, 0.86 and 0.95 respectively. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of the MDP is the first valid and reliable instrument to assess dyspnea multidimensionally in Portuguese-speaking patients with COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6490879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64908792019-05-17 A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD Belo, Letícia F. Rodrigues, Antenor Vicentin, Ana Paula Paes, Thaís de Castro, Larissa Araújo Hernandes, Nidia A. Pitta, Fabio PLoS One Research Article AIM: To provide a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP), investigating its validity and reliability in Brazilian patients with COPD. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study for translation and linguist validation of the Portuguese MDP version for patients with COPD. The process occurred according to the protocol of Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. Three scores of MDP were used for the analysis: the immediate unpleasantness of dyspnea (A1); the “immediate perception domain” (S) (sum of A1 plus the sensory descriptors) and the “emotional response domain” (A2) (sum of the emotional descriptors). The questionnaires COPD assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS) and Medical Research Council scale (MRC) were used as anchors to investigate MDP’s validity. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concurrent validity was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Thirty patients with moderate-severe COPD were studied for MDP’s validation analysis (43% male, 63±8years, body mass index [BMI] 27±6Kg/m(2), forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV(1)] 48±15%predicted, six-minute walking test [6MWT] 464±84m and 84±16%predicted), whereas 10 patients were excluded from the test-retest reliability analysis due to missing data, resulting in a sample of 20 subjects for this purpose (50% male, 62±8years, BMI 27±6Kg/m(2), FEV(1) 48±15%predicted, 6MWT 452±93m and 82±19%predicted). Both samples were similar regarding general characteristics (P>0,05 for all variables). MDP presented strong correlations, i.e., ICC intra-rater: A1: 0.77 (0.48–0.90), S: 0.78 (0.52–0.91), and A2: 0.85 (0.66–0.94), with high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.86, 0.88 and 0.92 respectively); and ICC inter-rater: A1: 0.74 (0.46–0.89), S: 0.75 (0.48–0.89) and A2: 0.91 (0.78–0.96) with Cronbach's α 0.85, 0.86 and 0.95 respectively. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese version of the MDP is the first valid and reliable instrument to assess dyspnea multidimensionally in Portuguese-speaking patients with COPD. Public Library of Science 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6490879/ /pubmed/31039167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215544 Text en © 2019 Belo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Belo, Letícia F.
Rodrigues, Antenor
Vicentin, Ana Paula
Paes, Thaís
de Castro, Larissa Araújo
Hernandes, Nidia A.
Pitta, Fabio
A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title_full A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title_fullStr A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title_short A breath of fresh air: Validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile for patients with COPD
title_sort breath of fresh air: validity and reliability of a portuguese version of the multidimensional dyspnea profile for patients with copd
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6490879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31039167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215544
work_keys_str_mv AT beloleticiaf abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT rodriguesantenor abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT vicentinanapaula abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT paesthais abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT decastrolarissaaraujo abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT hernandesnidiaa abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT pittafabio abreathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT beloleticiaf breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT rodriguesantenor breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT vicentinanapaula breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT paesthais breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT decastrolarissaaraujo breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT hernandesnidiaa breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd
AT pittafabio breathoffreshairvalidityandreliabilityofaportugueseversionofthemultidimensionaldyspneaprofileforpatientswithcopd