Cargando…
Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins
Objective This study was aimed to determine if different strategies of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in monoamniotic twins leads to receipt within 7 days of delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort of monoamniotic twins managed at a single institution from 2007 to 2017...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishers
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687872 |
_version_ | 1783414919397376000 |
---|---|
author | Bibbo, Carolina Easter, Sarah R. Saadeh, Michael Little, Sarah E. Robinson, Julian N. |
author_facet | Bibbo, Carolina Easter, Sarah R. Saadeh, Michael Little, Sarah E. Robinson, Julian N. |
author_sort | Bibbo, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective This study was aimed to determine if different strategies of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in monoamniotic twins leads to receipt within 7 days of delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort of monoamniotic twins managed at a single institution from 2007 to 2017. Patients were classified as to whether ACS were administered upon admission or at a predetermined gestational age (grouped together as “routine”) or for a change in clinical status (“indicated”). We used univariate analyses to associate ACS administration strategies with our primary outcome: receipt of ACS within 7 days of delivery. We then used generalized estimating equations to examine associations between fetal monitoring patterns and delivery within 1 week. Results Twenty-four patients were included: eighteen patients in the “routine” group and six patients in the “indicated” group. There was no difference in optimal timing of ACS administration. Women experiencing delivery within the week were thrice more likely to spend on average more than 3 hours/day on the fetal monitor when compared with those who remained undelivered. Conclusion Administration of ACS on admission is not effective. Fetal heart rate tracing surveillance might be a better methodology to predict delivery and guide ACS administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6491365 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Thieme Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64913652019-05-01 Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins Bibbo, Carolina Easter, Sarah R. Saadeh, Michael Little, Sarah E. Robinson, Julian N. AJP Rep Objective This study was aimed to determine if different strategies of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in monoamniotic twins leads to receipt within 7 days of delivery. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort of monoamniotic twins managed at a single institution from 2007 to 2017. Patients were classified as to whether ACS were administered upon admission or at a predetermined gestational age (grouped together as “routine”) or for a change in clinical status (“indicated”). We used univariate analyses to associate ACS administration strategies with our primary outcome: receipt of ACS within 7 days of delivery. We then used generalized estimating equations to examine associations between fetal monitoring patterns and delivery within 1 week. Results Twenty-four patients were included: eighteen patients in the “routine” group and six patients in the “indicated” group. There was no difference in optimal timing of ACS administration. Women experiencing delivery within the week were thrice more likely to spend on average more than 3 hours/day on the fetal monitor when compared with those who remained undelivered. Conclusion Administration of ACS on admission is not effective. Fetal heart rate tracing surveillance might be a better methodology to predict delivery and guide ACS administration. Thieme Medical Publishers 2019-04 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6491365/ /pubmed/31044097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687872 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bibbo, Carolina Easter, Sarah R. Saadeh, Michael Little, Sarah E. Robinson, Julian N. Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title | Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title_full | Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title_fullStr | Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title_full_unstemmed | Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title_short | Timing of Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration in Monoamniotic Twins |
title_sort | timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in monoamniotic twins |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491365/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1687872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bibbocarolina timingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinmonoamniotictwins AT eastersarahr timingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinmonoamniotictwins AT saadehmichael timingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinmonoamniotictwins AT littlesarahe timingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinmonoamniotictwins AT robinsonjuliann timingofantenatalcorticosteroidadministrationinmonoamniotictwins |