Cargando…

How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review

Quantifying bone loss is important to decide the best treatment for patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Currently, there is no standard method available to make a precise evaluation of the Hill–Sachs lesion and predict its engagement before the surgical procedure. This literat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maio, Marta, Sarmento, Marco, Moura, Nuno, Cartucho, António
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31057952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031
_version_ 1783415050070917120
author Maio, Marta
Sarmento, Marco
Moura, Nuno
Cartucho, António
author_facet Maio, Marta
Sarmento, Marco
Moura, Nuno
Cartucho, António
author_sort Maio, Marta
collection PubMed
description Quantifying bone loss is important to decide the best treatment for patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Currently, there is no standard method available to make a precise evaluation of the Hill–Sachs lesion and predict its engagement before the surgical procedure. This literature review was performed in order to identify existing published imaging methods quantifying humeral head bone loss in Hill–Sachs lesions. Searches were undertaken in Scopus and PubMed databases from January 2008 until February 2018. The search terms were “Hill-Sachs” and “measurement” for the initial search and “Hill–Sachs bone loss” for the second, to be present in the keywords, abstracts and title. All articles that presented a method for quantifying measurement of Hill–Sachs lesions were analysed. Several methods are currently available to evaluate Hill–Sachs lesions. The length, width and depth measurements on CT scans show strong inter and intra-observer correlation coefficients. Three-dimensional CT is helpful for evaluation of bony injuries; however, there were no significant differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements. The on-track off-track method using MRI allows a simultaneous evaluation of the Hill–Sachs and glenoid bone loss and also predicts the engaging lesions with good accuracy. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:151-157. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6491948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64919482019-05-03 How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review Maio, Marta Sarmento, Marco Moura, Nuno Cartucho, António EFORT Open Rev Shoulder & Elbow Quantifying bone loss is important to decide the best treatment for patients with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. Currently, there is no standard method available to make a precise evaluation of the Hill–Sachs lesion and predict its engagement before the surgical procedure. This literature review was performed in order to identify existing published imaging methods quantifying humeral head bone loss in Hill–Sachs lesions. Searches were undertaken in Scopus and PubMed databases from January 2008 until February 2018. The search terms were “Hill-Sachs” and “measurement” for the initial search and “Hill–Sachs bone loss” for the second, to be present in the keywords, abstracts and title. All articles that presented a method for quantifying measurement of Hill–Sachs lesions were analysed. Several methods are currently available to evaluate Hill–Sachs lesions. The length, width and depth measurements on CT scans show strong inter and intra-observer correlation coefficients. Three-dimensional CT is helpful for evaluation of bony injuries; however, there were no significant differences between 3D CT and 3D MRI measurements. The on-track off-track method using MRI allows a simultaneous evaluation of the Hill–Sachs and glenoid bone loss and also predicts the engaging lesions with good accuracy. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:151-157. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031 British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2019-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6491948/ /pubmed/31057952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031 Text en © 2019 The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Shoulder & Elbow
Maio, Marta
Sarmento, Marco
Moura, Nuno
Cartucho, António
How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title_full How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title_fullStr How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title_short How to measure a Hill–Sachs lesion: a systematic review
title_sort how to measure a hill–sachs lesion: a systematic review
topic Shoulder & Elbow
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31057952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180031
work_keys_str_mv AT maiomarta howtomeasureahillsachslesionasystematicreview
AT sarmentomarco howtomeasureahillsachslesionasystematicreview
AT mouranuno howtomeasureahillsachslesionasystematicreview
AT cartuchoantonio howtomeasureahillsachslesionasystematicreview