Cargando…

Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs

Numerous publications have now addressed the principles of designing, analyzing, and reporting the results of stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials. In contrast, there is little research available pertaining to the design and analysis of multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials, utilized t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grayling, Michael J., Mander, Adrian P., Wason, James M. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8022
_version_ 1783415056705257472
author Grayling, Michael J.
Mander, Adrian P.
Wason, James M. S.
author_facet Grayling, Michael J.
Mander, Adrian P.
Wason, James M. S.
author_sort Grayling, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description Numerous publications have now addressed the principles of designing, analyzing, and reporting the results of stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials. In contrast, there is little research available pertaining to the design and analysis of multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials, utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple experimental interventions. In this paper, we address this by explaining how the required sample size in these multiarm trials can be ascertained when data are to be analyzed using a linear mixed model. We then go on to describe how the design of such trials can be optimized to balance between minimizing the cost of the trial and minimizing some function of the covariance matrix of the treatment effect estimates. Using a recently commenced trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of sensor monitoring in an occupational therapy rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture as an example, we demonstrate that our designs could reduce the number of observations required for a fixed power level by up to 58%. Consequently, when logistical constraints permit the utilization of any one of a range of possible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs, researchers should consider employing our approach to optimize their trials efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6491976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64919762019-05-06 Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs Grayling, Michael J. Mander, Adrian P. Wason, James M. S. Stat Med Research Articles Numerous publications have now addressed the principles of designing, analyzing, and reporting the results of stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials. In contrast, there is little research available pertaining to the design and analysis of multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trials, utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple experimental interventions. In this paper, we address this by explaining how the required sample size in these multiarm trials can be ascertained when data are to be analyzed using a linear mixed model. We then go on to describe how the design of such trials can be optimized to balance between minimizing the cost of the trial and minimizing some function of the covariance matrix of the treatment effect estimates. Using a recently commenced trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of sensor monitoring in an occupational therapy rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture as an example, we demonstrate that our designs could reduce the number of observations required for a fixed power level by up to 58%. Consequently, when logistical constraints permit the utilization of any one of a range of possible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs, researchers should consider employing our approach to optimize their trials efficiency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-06 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6491976/ /pubmed/30402914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8022 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Grayling, Michael J.
Mander, Adrian P.
Wason, James M. S.
Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title_full Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title_fullStr Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title_full_unstemmed Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title_short Admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
title_sort admissible multiarm stepped‐wedge cluster randomized trial designs
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30402914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8022
work_keys_str_mv AT graylingmichaelj admissiblemultiarmsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialdesigns
AT manderadrianp admissiblemultiarmsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialdesigns
AT wasonjamesms admissiblemultiarmsteppedwedgeclusterrandomizedtrialdesigns