Cargando…

Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T

PURPOSE: To optimize (19)F imaging pulse sequences for perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas human lung ventilation MRI considering intrinsic in vivo relaxation parameters at both 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: Optimization of the imaging parameters for both 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) and steady‐state free precess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maunder, Adam, Rao, Madhwesha, Robb, Fraser, Wild, Jim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30387911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27479
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To optimize (19)F imaging pulse sequences for perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas human lung ventilation MRI considering intrinsic in vivo relaxation parameters at both 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: Optimization of the imaging parameters for both 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) and steady‐state free precession (SSFP) (19)F imaging sequences with inhaled 79% C(3)F(8%) and 21% oxygen was performed. Phantom measurements were used to validate simulations of SNR. In vivo parameter mapping and sequence optimization and comparison was performed by imaging the lungs of a healthy adult volunteer. T(1) and T(2) (*) mapping was performed in vivo to optimize sequence parameters for in vivo lung MRI. The performance of SSFP and SPGR was then evaluated in vivo at 1.5T and 3T. RESULTS: The in vivo T(2) (*) of C(3)F(8) was shown to be dependent upon lung inflation level (2.04 ms ± 36% for residual volume and 3.14 ms ± 28% for total lung capacity measured at 3T), with lower T(2) (*) observed near the susceptibility interfaces of the diaphragm and around pulmonary blood vessels. Simulation and phantom measurements indicate that a factor of ~2‐3 higher SNR can be achieved with SSFP when compared with optimized SPGR. In vivo lung imaging showed a 1.7 factor of improvement in SNR achieved at 1.5T, while the theoretical improvement at 3T was not attained due to experimental SAR constraints, shorter in vivo T(1), and B(0) inhomogeneity. CONCLUSION: SSFP imaging provides increased SNR in lung ventilation imaging of C(3)F(8) demonstrated at 1.5T with optimized SSFP similar to the SNR that can be obtained at 3T with optimized SPGR.