Cargando…
Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T
PURPOSE: To optimize (19)F imaging pulse sequences for perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas human lung ventilation MRI considering intrinsic in vivo relaxation parameters at both 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: Optimization of the imaging parameters for both 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) and steady‐state free precess...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30387911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27479 |
_version_ | 1783415059398000640 |
---|---|
author | Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. |
author_facet | Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. |
author_sort | Maunder, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To optimize (19)F imaging pulse sequences for perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas human lung ventilation MRI considering intrinsic in vivo relaxation parameters at both 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: Optimization of the imaging parameters for both 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) and steady‐state free precession (SSFP) (19)F imaging sequences with inhaled 79% C(3)F(8%) and 21% oxygen was performed. Phantom measurements were used to validate simulations of SNR. In vivo parameter mapping and sequence optimization and comparison was performed by imaging the lungs of a healthy adult volunteer. T(1) and T(2) (*) mapping was performed in vivo to optimize sequence parameters for in vivo lung MRI. The performance of SSFP and SPGR was then evaluated in vivo at 1.5T and 3T. RESULTS: The in vivo T(2) (*) of C(3)F(8) was shown to be dependent upon lung inflation level (2.04 ms ± 36% for residual volume and 3.14 ms ± 28% for total lung capacity measured at 3T), with lower T(2) (*) observed near the susceptibility interfaces of the diaphragm and around pulmonary blood vessels. Simulation and phantom measurements indicate that a factor of ~2‐3 higher SNR can be achieved with SSFP when compared with optimized SPGR. In vivo lung imaging showed a 1.7 factor of improvement in SNR achieved at 1.5T, while the theoretical improvement at 3T was not attained due to experimental SAR constraints, shorter in vivo T(1), and B(0) inhomogeneity. CONCLUSION: SSFP imaging provides increased SNR in lung ventilation imaging of C(3)F(8) demonstrated at 1.5T with optimized SSFP similar to the SNR that can be obtained at 3T with optimized SPGR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6491987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64919872019-05-06 Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. Magn Reson Med Full Papers—Imaging Methodology PURPOSE: To optimize (19)F imaging pulse sequences for perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas human lung ventilation MRI considering intrinsic in vivo relaxation parameters at both 1.5T and 3T. METHODS: Optimization of the imaging parameters for both 3D spoiled gradient (SPGR) and steady‐state free precession (SSFP) (19)F imaging sequences with inhaled 79% C(3)F(8%) and 21% oxygen was performed. Phantom measurements were used to validate simulations of SNR. In vivo parameter mapping and sequence optimization and comparison was performed by imaging the lungs of a healthy adult volunteer. T(1) and T(2) (*) mapping was performed in vivo to optimize sequence parameters for in vivo lung MRI. The performance of SSFP and SPGR was then evaluated in vivo at 1.5T and 3T. RESULTS: The in vivo T(2) (*) of C(3)F(8) was shown to be dependent upon lung inflation level (2.04 ms ± 36% for residual volume and 3.14 ms ± 28% for total lung capacity measured at 3T), with lower T(2) (*) observed near the susceptibility interfaces of the diaphragm and around pulmonary blood vessels. Simulation and phantom measurements indicate that a factor of ~2‐3 higher SNR can be achieved with SSFP when compared with optimized SPGR. In vivo lung imaging showed a 1.7 factor of improvement in SNR achieved at 1.5T, while the theoretical improvement at 3T was not attained due to experimental SAR constraints, shorter in vivo T(1), and B(0) inhomogeneity. CONCLUSION: SSFP imaging provides increased SNR in lung ventilation imaging of C(3)F(8) demonstrated at 1.5T with optimized SSFP similar to the SNR that can be obtained at 3T with optimized SPGR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-02 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6491987/ /pubmed/30387911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27479 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Full Papers—Imaging Methodology Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title | Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title_full | Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title_fullStr | Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title_short | Optimization of steady‐state free precession MRI for lung ventilation imaging with (19)F C(3)F(8) at 1.5T and 3T |
title_sort | optimization of steady‐state free precession mri for lung ventilation imaging with (19)f c(3)f(8) at 1.5t and 3t |
topic | Full Papers—Imaging Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6491987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30387911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maunderadam optimizationofsteadystatefreeprecessionmriforlungventilationimagingwith19fc3f8at15tand3t AT raomadhwesha optimizationofsteadystatefreeprecessionmriforlungventilationimagingwith19fc3f8at15tand3t AT robbfraser optimizationofsteadystatefreeprecessionmriforlungventilationimagingwith19fc3f8at15tand3t AT wildjimm optimizationofsteadystatefreeprecessionmriforlungventilationimagingwith19fc3f8at15tand3t |