Cargando…

Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation

BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is useful, for theoretical and practical reasons, to be able to specify functions for continuous abstinence over time in smoking cessation attempts. This study aimed to find the best‐fitting models of mean proportion abstinent with different smoking cessation pharmacotherapies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Sarah E., McGowan, Jennifer A., Ubhi, Harveen Kaur, Proudfoot, Hannah, Shahab, Lion, Brown, Jamie, West, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30614586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14549
_version_ 1783415063596498944
author Jackson, Sarah E.
McGowan, Jennifer A.
Ubhi, Harveen Kaur
Proudfoot, Hannah
Shahab, Lion
Brown, Jamie
West, Robert
author_facet Jackson, Sarah E.
McGowan, Jennifer A.
Ubhi, Harveen Kaur
Proudfoot, Hannah
Shahab, Lion
Brown, Jamie
West, Robert
author_sort Jackson, Sarah E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is useful, for theoretical and practical reasons, to be able to specify functions for continuous abstinence over time in smoking cessation attempts. This study aimed to find the best‐fitting models of mean proportion abstinent with different smoking cessation pharmacotherapies up to 52 weeks from the quit date. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological treatments to aid smoking cessation. For comparability, we selected trials that provided 12 weeks of treatment. Continuous abstinence rates for each treatment at each follow‐up point in trials were extracted along with methodological details of the trial. Data points for each pharmacotherapy at each follow‐up point were aggregated where the total across contributing studies included at least 1000 participants per data point. Continuous abstinence curves were modelled using a range of different functions from the quit date to 52‐week follow‐up. Models were compared for fit using R (2) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). RESULTS: Studies meeting our selection criteria covered three pharmacotherapies [varenicline, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion] and placebo. Power functions provided the best fit (R (2) > 0.99, BIC < 17.0) to continuous abstinence curves from the target quit date in all cases except for varenicline, where a logarithmic function described the curve best (R (2) = 0.99, BIC = 21.2). At 52 weeks, abstinence rates were 22.5% (23.0% modelled) for varenicline, 16.7% (16.0% modelled) for bupropion, 13.0% (12.4% modelled) for NRT and 8.3% (8.9% modelled) for placebo. For varenicline, bupropion, NRT and placebo, respectively, 55.9, 65.0, 62.3 and 56.5% of participants who were abstinent at the end of treatment were still abstinent at 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Mean continuous abstinence rates up to 52 weeks from initiation of smoking cessation attempts in clinical trials can be modelled using simple power functions for placebo, nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion and a logarithmic function for varenicline. This allows accurate prediction of abstinence rates from any time point to any other time point up to 52 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6492005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64920052019-05-06 Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation Jackson, Sarah E. McGowan, Jennifer A. Ubhi, Harveen Kaur Proudfoot, Hannah Shahab, Lion Brown, Jamie West, Robert Addiction Review BACKGROUND AND AIM: It is useful, for theoretical and practical reasons, to be able to specify functions for continuous abstinence over time in smoking cessation attempts. This study aimed to find the best‐fitting models of mean proportion abstinent with different smoking cessation pharmacotherapies up to 52 weeks from the quit date. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological treatments to aid smoking cessation. For comparability, we selected trials that provided 12 weeks of treatment. Continuous abstinence rates for each treatment at each follow‐up point in trials were extracted along with methodological details of the trial. Data points for each pharmacotherapy at each follow‐up point were aggregated where the total across contributing studies included at least 1000 participants per data point. Continuous abstinence curves were modelled using a range of different functions from the quit date to 52‐week follow‐up. Models were compared for fit using R (2) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). RESULTS: Studies meeting our selection criteria covered three pharmacotherapies [varenicline, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and bupropion] and placebo. Power functions provided the best fit (R (2) > 0.99, BIC < 17.0) to continuous abstinence curves from the target quit date in all cases except for varenicline, where a logarithmic function described the curve best (R (2) = 0.99, BIC = 21.2). At 52 weeks, abstinence rates were 22.5% (23.0% modelled) for varenicline, 16.7% (16.0% modelled) for bupropion, 13.0% (12.4% modelled) for NRT and 8.3% (8.9% modelled) for placebo. For varenicline, bupropion, NRT and placebo, respectively, 55.9, 65.0, 62.3 and 56.5% of participants who were abstinent at the end of treatment were still abstinent at 52 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Mean continuous abstinence rates up to 52 weeks from initiation of smoking cessation attempts in clinical trials can be modelled using simple power functions for placebo, nicotine replacement therapy and bupropion and a logarithmic function for varenicline. This allows accurate prediction of abstinence rates from any time point to any other time point up to 52 weeks. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-01-29 2019-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6492005/ /pubmed/30614586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14549 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jackson, Sarah E.
McGowan, Jennifer A.
Ubhi, Harveen Kaur
Proudfoot, Hannah
Shahab, Lion
Brown, Jamie
West, Robert
Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title_full Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title_fullStr Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title_full_unstemmed Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title_short Modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
title_sort modelling continuous abstinence rates over time from clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30614586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14549
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonsarahe modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT mcgowanjennifera modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT ubhiharveenkaur modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT proudfoothannah modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT shahablion modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT brownjamie modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation
AT westrobert modellingcontinuousabstinenceratesovertimefromclinicaltrialsofpharmacologicalinterventionsforsmokingcessation