Cargando…

Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative

The International Council on Harmonization (ICH) S7B and E14 regulatory guidelines are sensitive but not specific for predicting which drugs are pro‐arrhythmic. In response, the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) was proposed that integrates multi‐ion channel pharmacology data in vitr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zhihua, Ridder, Bradley J., Han, Xiaomei, Wu, Wendy W., Sheng, Jiansong, Tran, Phu N., Wu, Min, Randolph, Aaron, Johnstone, Ross H., Mirams, Gary R., Kuryshev, Yuri, Kramer, James, Wu, Caiyun, Crumb, William J., Strauss, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1184
_version_ 1783415075098329088
author Li, Zhihua
Ridder, Bradley J.
Han, Xiaomei
Wu, Wendy W.
Sheng, Jiansong
Tran, Phu N.
Wu, Min
Randolph, Aaron
Johnstone, Ross H.
Mirams, Gary R.
Kuryshev, Yuri
Kramer, James
Wu, Caiyun
Crumb, William J.
Strauss, David G.
author_facet Li, Zhihua
Ridder, Bradley J.
Han, Xiaomei
Wu, Wendy W.
Sheng, Jiansong
Tran, Phu N.
Wu, Min
Randolph, Aaron
Johnstone, Ross H.
Mirams, Gary R.
Kuryshev, Yuri
Kramer, James
Wu, Caiyun
Crumb, William J.
Strauss, David G.
author_sort Li, Zhihua
collection PubMed
description The International Council on Harmonization (ICH) S7B and E14 regulatory guidelines are sensitive but not specific for predicting which drugs are pro‐arrhythmic. In response, the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) was proposed that integrates multi‐ion channel pharmacology data in vitro into a human cardiomyocyte model in silico for proarrhythmia risk assessment. Previously, we reported the model optimization and proarrhythmia metric selection based on CiPA training drugs. In this study, we report the application of the prespecified model and metric to independent CiPA validation drugs. Over two validation datasets, the CiPA model performance meets all pre‐specified measures for ranking and classifying validation drugs, and outperforms alternatives, despite some in vitro data differences between the two datasets due to different experimental conditions and quality control procedures. This suggests that the current CiPA model/metric may be fit for regulatory use, and standardization of experimental protocols and quality control criteria could increase the model prediction accuracy even further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6492074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64920742019-05-06 Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative Li, Zhihua Ridder, Bradley J. Han, Xiaomei Wu, Wendy W. Sheng, Jiansong Tran, Phu N. Wu, Min Randolph, Aaron Johnstone, Ross H. Mirams, Gary R. Kuryshev, Yuri Kramer, James Wu, Caiyun Crumb, William J. Strauss, David G. Clin Pharmacol Ther Research The International Council on Harmonization (ICH) S7B and E14 regulatory guidelines are sensitive but not specific for predicting which drugs are pro‐arrhythmic. In response, the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) was proposed that integrates multi‐ion channel pharmacology data in vitro into a human cardiomyocyte model in silico for proarrhythmia risk assessment. Previously, we reported the model optimization and proarrhythmia metric selection based on CiPA training drugs. In this study, we report the application of the prespecified model and metric to independent CiPA validation drugs. Over two validation datasets, the CiPA model performance meets all pre‐specified measures for ranking and classifying validation drugs, and outperforms alternatives, despite some in vitro data differences between the two datasets due to different experimental conditions and quality control procedures. This suggests that the current CiPA model/metric may be fit for regulatory use, and standardization of experimental protocols and quality control criteria could increase the model prediction accuracy even further. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-27 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6492074/ /pubmed/30151907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1184 Text en © 2018 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Zhihua
Ridder, Bradley J.
Han, Xiaomei
Wu, Wendy W.
Sheng, Jiansong
Tran, Phu N.
Wu, Min
Randolph, Aaron
Johnstone, Ross H.
Mirams, Gary R.
Kuryshev, Yuri
Kramer, James
Wu, Caiyun
Crumb, William J.
Strauss, David G.
Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title_full Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title_fullStr Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title_short Assessment of an In Silico Mechanistic Model for Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Under the CiPA Initiative
title_sort assessment of an in silico mechanistic model for proarrhythmia risk prediction under the cipa initiative
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30151907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpt.1184
work_keys_str_mv AT lizhihua assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT ridderbradleyj assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT hanxiaomei assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT wuwendyw assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT shengjiansong assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT tranphun assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT wumin assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT randolphaaron assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT johnstonerossh assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT miramsgaryr assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT kuryshevyuri assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT kramerjames assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT wucaiyun assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT crumbwilliamj assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative
AT straussdavidg assessmentofaninsilicomechanisticmodelforproarrhythmiariskpredictionunderthecipainitiative