Cargando…
Incorporating external evidence on between‐trial heterogeneity in network meta‐analysis
In a network meta‐analysis, between‐study heterogeneity variances are often very imprecisely estimated because data are sparse, so standard errors of treatment differences can be highly unstable. External evidence can provide informative prior distributions for heterogeneity and, hence, improve infe...
Autores principales: | Turner, Rebecca M., Domínguez‐Islas, Clara P., Jackson, Dan, Rhodes, Kirsty M., White, Ian R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30488475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.8044 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta‐analysis using meta‐regression and pseudo data
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects
por: Law, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Methods for calculating confidence and credible intervals for the residual between-study variance in random effects meta-regression models
por: Jackson, Dan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)