Cargando…
Automated methods to test connectedness and quantify indirectness of evidence in network meta‐analysis
Network meta‐analysis compares multiple treatments from studies that form a connected network of evidence. However, for complex networks, it is not easy to see if the network is connected. We use simple techniques from graph theory to test the connectedness of evidence networks in network meta‐analy...
Autores principales: | Thom, Howard, White, Ian R., Welton, Nicky J., Lu, Guobing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30403829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1329 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Quantifying how diagnostic test accuracy depends on threshold in a meta‐analysis
por: Jones, Hayley E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis
por: van Valkenhoef, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Equivalence of entropy balancing and the method of moments for matching‐adjusted indirect comparison
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Shared parameter model for competing risks and different data summaries in meta‐analysis: Implications for common and rare outcomes
por: Thom, Howard, et al.
Publicado: (2019)