Cargando…

Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents

BACKGROUND: To study the outcome and experience of using metallic stents in treating patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with MUO were assigned to the metallic stent group (MSG) or the ordinary polymer stent group (OPSG) according to the different materi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yue, Liu, Cheng-yi, Zhang, Zhi-hong, Xu, Peng-cheng, Chen, De-gang, Fan, Xin-huan, Ma, Ji-ci, Xu, Yi-peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31039812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1608-6
_version_ 1783415123468091392
author Chen, Yue
Liu, Cheng-yi
Zhang, Zhi-hong
Xu, Peng-cheng
Chen, De-gang
Fan, Xin-huan
Ma, Ji-ci
Xu, Yi-peng
author_facet Chen, Yue
Liu, Cheng-yi
Zhang, Zhi-hong
Xu, Peng-cheng
Chen, De-gang
Fan, Xin-huan
Ma, Ji-ci
Xu, Yi-peng
author_sort Chen, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study the outcome and experience of using metallic stents in treating patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with MUO were assigned to the metallic stent group (MSG) or the ordinary polymer stent group (OPSG) according to the different materials. The success rate of the operation, duration of operation, patency rate serum creatinine values ,postoperative complications and QOL scores were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the OPSG and MSG, the success rates of the operation were 95.5% and 96.9%, respectively, and the durations of the operation were 20.6 ± 2.2 min and 50.9 ± 10.3 min (P < 0.01), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in serum creatinine values at 3 days after the operation (P > 0.05); however, the creatinine values at 3 days after the operation decreased significantly compared with those before the operation (P < 0.01). In the OPSG, there was no significant difference in creatinine values between 3 days and 6 months after operation, while the creatinine values 1 year after operation were increased significantly compared to those at 3 days after the operation (P < 0.05). In the MSG, there was no significant difference among creatinine values at different intervals (P > 0.05). The total rate of post-procedural complication was lower in the MSG than that in the OPSG(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the QOL score between the two groups before the operation (P > 0.05); however, the QOL scores at 6 months and 1 year after the operation were higher in the MSG than that in the OPSG(P < 0.05). In the MSG, there was no significant difference in the QOL score between preoperation and 6 months after surgery. Similarly, there was also no difference in the QOL score between 6 months after surgery and 1 year after surgery(P > 0.05). On the contrary, the differences of QOL score in the OPSG group were much significant between disparate time intervals (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MUO who require long-term retention of the stent, metallic stents with longer indwelling time are superior to ordinary polymeric stents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6492337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64923372019-05-06 Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents Chen, Yue Liu, Cheng-yi Zhang, Zhi-hong Xu, Peng-cheng Chen, De-gang Fan, Xin-huan Ma, Ji-ci Xu, Yi-peng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To study the outcome and experience of using metallic stents in treating patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO). METHODS: Seventy-six patients with MUO were assigned to the metallic stent group (MSG) or the ordinary polymer stent group (OPSG) according to the different materials. The success rate of the operation, duration of operation, patency rate serum creatinine values ,postoperative complications and QOL scores were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In the OPSG and MSG, the success rates of the operation were 95.5% and 96.9%, respectively, and the durations of the operation were 20.6 ± 2.2 min and 50.9 ± 10.3 min (P < 0.01), respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups in serum creatinine values at 3 days after the operation (P > 0.05); however, the creatinine values at 3 days after the operation decreased significantly compared with those before the operation (P < 0.01). In the OPSG, there was no significant difference in creatinine values between 3 days and 6 months after operation, while the creatinine values 1 year after operation were increased significantly compared to those at 3 days after the operation (P < 0.05). In the MSG, there was no significant difference among creatinine values at different intervals (P > 0.05). The total rate of post-procedural complication was lower in the MSG than that in the OPSG(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the QOL score between the two groups before the operation (P > 0.05); however, the QOL scores at 6 months and 1 year after the operation were higher in the MSG than that in the OPSG(P < 0.05). In the MSG, there was no significant difference in the QOL score between preoperation and 6 months after surgery. Similarly, there was also no difference in the QOL score between 6 months after surgery and 1 year after surgery(P > 0.05). On the contrary, the differences of QOL score in the OPSG group were much significant between disparate time intervals (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with MUO who require long-term retention of the stent, metallic stents with longer indwelling time are superior to ordinary polymeric stents. BioMed Central 2019-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6492337/ /pubmed/31039812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1608-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chen, Yue
Liu, Cheng-yi
Zhang, Zhi-hong
Xu, Peng-cheng
Chen, De-gang
Fan, Xin-huan
Ma, Ji-ci
Xu, Yi-peng
Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title_full Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title_fullStr Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title_full_unstemmed Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title_short Malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
title_sort malignant ureteral obstruction: experience and comparative analysis of metallic versus ordinary polymer ureteral stents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6492337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31039812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1608-6
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyue malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT liuchengyi malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT zhangzhihong malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT xupengcheng malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT chendegang malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT fanxinhuan malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT majici malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents
AT xuyipeng malignantureteralobstructionexperienceandcomparativeanalysisofmetallicversusordinarypolymerureteralstents