Cargando…
Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies
BACKGROUND: The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs usi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205633 |
_version_ | 1783415208035745792 |
---|---|
author | Emerson, Joanna Panzer, Ari Cohen, Joshua T. Chalkidou, Kalipso Teerawattananon, Yot Sculpher, Mark Wilkinson, Thomas Walker, Damian Neumann, Peter J. Kim, David D. |
author_facet | Emerson, Joanna Panzer, Ari Cohen, Joshua T. Chalkidou, Kalipso Teerawattananon, Yot Sculpher, Mark Wilkinson, Thomas Walker, Damian Neumann, Peter J. Kim, David D. |
author_sort | Emerson, Joanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). METHODS: We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014–2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. RESULTS: Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). CONCLUSIONS: The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6493721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64937212019-05-17 Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies Emerson, Joanna Panzer, Ari Cohen, Joshua T. Chalkidou, Kalipso Teerawattananon, Yot Sculpher, Mark Wilkinson, Thomas Walker, Damian Neumann, Peter J. Kim, David D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting practices for CEAs using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). METHODS: We analyzed the Tufts Medical Center Global Health CEA Registry to identify cost-per-DALY averted studies published from 2011 to 2017. Among each of 11 principles in the iDSI reference case, we translated all methodological specifications and reporting standards into a series of binary questions (satisfied or not satisfied) and awarded articles one point for each item satisfied. We then calculated methodological and reporting adherence scores separately as a percentage of total possible points, measured as normalized adherence score (0% = no adherence; 100% = full adherence). Using the year 2014 as the dissemination period, we conducted a pre-post analysis. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using: 1) optional criteria in scoring, 2) alternate dissemination period (2014–2015), and 3) alternative comparator classification. RESULTS: Articles averaged 60% adherence to methodological specifications and 74% adherence to reporting standards. While methodological adherence scores did not significantly improve (59% pre-2014 vs. 60% post-2014, p = 0.53), reporting adherence scores increased slightly over time (72% pre-2014 vs. 75% post-2014, p<0.01). Overall, reporting adherence scores exceeded methodological adherence scores (74% vs. 60%, p<0.001). Articles seldom addressed budget impact (9% reporting, 10% methodological) or equity (7% reporting, 7% methodological). CONCLUSIONS: The iDSI reference case has substantial potential to serve as a useful resource for researchers and policy-makers in global health settings, but greater effort to promote adherence and awareness is needed to achieve its potential. Public Library of Science 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6493721/ /pubmed/31042714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205633 Text en © 2019 Emerson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Emerson, Joanna Panzer, Ari Cohen, Joshua T. Chalkidou, Kalipso Teerawattananon, Yot Sculpher, Mark Wilkinson, Thomas Walker, Damian Neumann, Peter J. Kim, David D. Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title | Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title_full | Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title_fullStr | Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title_short | Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies |
title_sort | adherence to the idsi reference case among published cost-per-daly averted studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emersonjoanna adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT panzerari adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT cohenjoshuat adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT chalkidoukalipso adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT teerawattananonyot adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT sculphermark adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT wilkinsonthomas adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT walkerdamian adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT neumannpeterj adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies AT kimdavidd adherencetotheidsireferencecaseamongpublishedcostperdalyavertedstudies |