Cargando…

Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task

Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dale, Rachel, Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain, Marshall-Pescini, Sarah, Range, Friederike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444
_version_ 1783415211558961152
author Dale, Rachel
Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_facet Dale, Rachel
Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
author_sort Dale, Rachel
collection PubMed
description Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperation, leading to the opposing prediction- increased prosocial tendencies in dogs. To tease apart these hypotheses we adapted a paradigm previously used with pet dogs to directly compare dogs and wolves. In a prosocial choice task, wolves acted prosocially to in-group partners; providing significantly more food to a pack-member compared to a control where the partner had no access to the food. Dogs did not. Additionally, wolves did not show a prosocial response to non-pack members, in line with previous research that social relationships are important for prosociality. In sum, when kept in the same conditions, wolves are more prosocial than their domestic counterpart, further supporting suggestions that reliance on cooperation is a driving force for prosocial attitudes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6493736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64937362019-05-17 Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task Dale, Rachel Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike PLoS One Research Article Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperation, leading to the opposing prediction- increased prosocial tendencies in dogs. To tease apart these hypotheses we adapted a paradigm previously used with pet dogs to directly compare dogs and wolves. In a prosocial choice task, wolves acted prosocially to in-group partners; providing significantly more food to a pack-member compared to a control where the partner had no access to the food. Dogs did not. Additionally, wolves did not show a prosocial response to non-pack members, in line with previous research that social relationships are important for prosociality. In sum, when kept in the same conditions, wolves are more prosocial than their domestic counterpart, further supporting suggestions that reliance on cooperation is a driving force for prosocial attitudes. Public Library of Science 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6493736/ /pubmed/31042740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444 Text en © 2019 Dale et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dale, Rachel
Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain
Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
Range, Friederike
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title_full Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title_fullStr Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title_full_unstemmed Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title_short Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
title_sort wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444
work_keys_str_mv AT dalerachel wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask
AT palmajacintosylvain wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask
AT marshallpescinisarah wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask
AT rangefriederike wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask