Cargando…
Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task
Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444 |
_version_ | 1783415211558961152 |
---|---|
author | Dale, Rachel Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike |
author_facet | Dale, Rachel Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike |
author_sort | Dale, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperation, leading to the opposing prediction- increased prosocial tendencies in dogs. To tease apart these hypotheses we adapted a paradigm previously used with pet dogs to directly compare dogs and wolves. In a prosocial choice task, wolves acted prosocially to in-group partners; providing significantly more food to a pack-member compared to a control where the partner had no access to the food. Dogs did not. Additionally, wolves did not show a prosocial response to non-pack members, in line with previous research that social relationships are important for prosociality. In sum, when kept in the same conditions, wolves are more prosocial than their domestic counterpart, further supporting suggestions that reliance on cooperation is a driving force for prosocial attitudes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6493736 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64937362019-05-17 Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task Dale, Rachel Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike PLoS One Research Article Prosociality is important for initiating cooperation. Interestingly, while wolves rely heavily on cooperation, dogs’ do so substantially less thus leading to the prediction that wolves are more prosocial than dogs. However, domestication hypotheses suggest dogs have been selected for higher cooperation, leading to the opposing prediction- increased prosocial tendencies in dogs. To tease apart these hypotheses we adapted a paradigm previously used with pet dogs to directly compare dogs and wolves. In a prosocial choice task, wolves acted prosocially to in-group partners; providing significantly more food to a pack-member compared to a control where the partner had no access to the food. Dogs did not. Additionally, wolves did not show a prosocial response to non-pack members, in line with previous research that social relationships are important for prosociality. In sum, when kept in the same conditions, wolves are more prosocial than their domestic counterpart, further supporting suggestions that reliance on cooperation is a driving force for prosocial attitudes. Public Library of Science 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6493736/ /pubmed/31042740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444 Text en © 2019 Dale et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dale, Rachel Palma-Jacinto, Sylvain Marshall-Pescini, Sarah Range, Friederike Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title | Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title_full | Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title_fullStr | Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title_full_unstemmed | Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title_short | Wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
title_sort | wolves, but not dogs, are prosocial in a touch screen task |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493736/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dalerachel wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask AT palmajacintosylvain wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask AT marshallpescinisarah wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask AT rangefriederike wolvesbutnotdogsareprosocialinatouchscreentask |