Cargando…

Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement

OBJECTIVES: To identify a broad range of research priorities to inform the studies seeking to improve population health outcomes based on the engagement of diverse stakeholders. METHODS: A multi-step, participatory and mixed-methods approach was adopted to solicit and structure the investigative the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thumboo, Julian, Yoon, Sungwon, Wee, Sharon, Yeam, Cheng Teng, Low, Edwin C. T., Lee, Chien Earn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216303
_version_ 1783415217400578048
author Thumboo, Julian
Yoon, Sungwon
Wee, Sharon
Yeam, Cheng Teng
Low, Edwin C. T.
Lee, Chien Earn
author_facet Thumboo, Julian
Yoon, Sungwon
Wee, Sharon
Yeam, Cheng Teng
Low, Edwin C. T.
Lee, Chien Earn
author_sort Thumboo, Julian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify a broad range of research priorities to inform the studies seeking to improve population health outcomes based on the engagement of diverse stakeholders. METHODS: A multi-step, participatory and mixed-methods approach was adopted to solicit and structure the investigative themes from diverse stakeholders. The priority setting exercise involved four key phases: (1) feedback from community leadership; (2) interim ranking survey and focus group discussions during the population health symposium; (3) individual in-depth interviews with stakeholders in the community; and (4) synthesis of the research priorities from the multistep process. RESULTS: Diverse stakeholders in Singapore, comprising community partnership leaders, health care and social service providers, users of population health services, patients and caregivers, participated in the research priority setting exercise. Initial 14 priorities were identified from six community leadership feedback, 42 survey responses, two focus groups (n = 16) and 95 in-depth interviews. The final integrated research agenda identified six priorities: empower residents and patients to take charge of their health; improve care transition and management through relationship building and communication; enhance health-social care interface; improve respite care services for long-term caregivers; develop primary care as a driving force for care integration; and capacity building for service providers. Selected research questions in each priority area were also generated to develop novel models of care, foster collaboration, implement optimal services and enhance understanding of the end users’ care needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates that greater community engagement in research priority setting for population health can facilitate the formulation of evidence-based research agendas that matter to the care providers and service users in the community. The outcomes derived from this exercise will help focus researchers’ efforts through which meaningful gains can be made for population health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6493761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64937612019-05-17 Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement Thumboo, Julian Yoon, Sungwon Wee, Sharon Yeam, Cheng Teng Low, Edwin C. T. Lee, Chien Earn PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To identify a broad range of research priorities to inform the studies seeking to improve population health outcomes based on the engagement of diverse stakeholders. METHODS: A multi-step, participatory and mixed-methods approach was adopted to solicit and structure the investigative themes from diverse stakeholders. The priority setting exercise involved four key phases: (1) feedback from community leadership; (2) interim ranking survey and focus group discussions during the population health symposium; (3) individual in-depth interviews with stakeholders in the community; and (4) synthesis of the research priorities from the multistep process. RESULTS: Diverse stakeholders in Singapore, comprising community partnership leaders, health care and social service providers, users of population health services, patients and caregivers, participated in the research priority setting exercise. Initial 14 priorities were identified from six community leadership feedback, 42 survey responses, two focus groups (n = 16) and 95 in-depth interviews. The final integrated research agenda identified six priorities: empower residents and patients to take charge of their health; improve care transition and management through relationship building and communication; enhance health-social care interface; improve respite care services for long-term caregivers; develop primary care as a driving force for care integration; and capacity building for service providers. Selected research questions in each priority area were also generated to develop novel models of care, foster collaboration, implement optimal services and enhance understanding of the end users’ care needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates that greater community engagement in research priority setting for population health can facilitate the formulation of evidence-based research agendas that matter to the care providers and service users in the community. The outcomes derived from this exercise will help focus researchers’ efforts through which meaningful gains can be made for population health. Public Library of Science 2019-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6493761/ /pubmed/31042782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216303 Text en © 2019 Thumboo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thumboo, Julian
Yoon, Sungwon
Wee, Sharon
Yeam, Cheng Teng
Low, Edwin C. T.
Lee, Chien Earn
Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title_full Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title_fullStr Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title_full_unstemmed Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title_short Developing population health research priorities in Asian city state: Results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
title_sort developing population health research priorities in asian city state: results from a multi-step participatory community engagement
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6493761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31042782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216303
work_keys_str_mv AT thumboojulian developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement
AT yoonsungwon developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement
AT weesharon developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement
AT yeamchengteng developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement
AT lowedwinct developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement
AT leechienearn developingpopulationhealthresearchprioritiesinasiancitystateresultsfromamultistepparticipatorycommunityengagement