Cargando…

Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation

INTRODUCTION: The histologic evaluation of lung allografts after transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) is a key component of the clinical care of lung transplant recipients. With established guidelines on diagnosing allograft rejection, no specific recommendations exist on timeliness to reaching a diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Don, Nicholson, Kerri L., Miller, Rebecca, Nance, Ashley E., Kirkby, Stephen E., Parker, William, Baker, Peter B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31321363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000146
_version_ 1783415235070132224
author Hayes, Don
Nicholson, Kerri L.
Miller, Rebecca
Nance, Ashley E.
Kirkby, Stephen E.
Parker, William
Baker, Peter B.
author_facet Hayes, Don
Nicholson, Kerri L.
Miller, Rebecca
Nance, Ashley E.
Kirkby, Stephen E.
Parker, William
Baker, Peter B.
author_sort Hayes, Don
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The histologic evaluation of lung allografts after transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) is a key component of the clinical care of lung transplant recipients. With established guidelines on diagnosing allograft rejection, no specific recommendations exist on timeliness to reaching a diagnosis and initiating therapy. A quality improvement initiative focused on 3 key stages of achieving a prompt diagnosis of acute cellular rejection including tissue processing, interpretation, and notification to the treating transplant pulmonologist was initiated to minimize time to treatment onset. METHODS: We completed a single-center cohort study on all surveillance and clinically indicated TBBx from September 2006 to March 2018. The rapid tissue processing, interpretation, and notification system was instituted in March 2011 with data before this date serving as baseline. RESULTS: We enrolled 28 patients who underwent 210 TBBx (1 excluded due to unknown notification date). Thirty-eight TBBx were included at baseline before implementation of the rapid tissue processing and communication system; 171 were included after implementation. Median time to notification following the change was 0 days (interquartile range, 0–1) compared with 1 day (interquartile range, 1–1) before the change (P < 0.001). After the change, same-day notification increased, with 110 (64%) TBBx resulting in same-day notification compared with 0 before (P < 0.001). We initiated treatment of acute cellular rejection on the day of diagnosis for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement initiative resulted in more efficient analysis of TBBx of allografts in lung transplant recipients and faster communication of results to the clinical team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6494224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64942242019-07-18 Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation Hayes, Don Nicholson, Kerri L. Miller, Rebecca Nance, Ashley E. Kirkby, Stephen E. Parker, William Baker, Peter B. Pediatr Qual Saf Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions INTRODUCTION: The histologic evaluation of lung allografts after transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) is a key component of the clinical care of lung transplant recipients. With established guidelines on diagnosing allograft rejection, no specific recommendations exist on timeliness to reaching a diagnosis and initiating therapy. A quality improvement initiative focused on 3 key stages of achieving a prompt diagnosis of acute cellular rejection including tissue processing, interpretation, and notification to the treating transplant pulmonologist was initiated to minimize time to treatment onset. METHODS: We completed a single-center cohort study on all surveillance and clinically indicated TBBx from September 2006 to March 2018. The rapid tissue processing, interpretation, and notification system was instituted in March 2011 with data before this date serving as baseline. RESULTS: We enrolled 28 patients who underwent 210 TBBx (1 excluded due to unknown notification date). Thirty-eight TBBx were included at baseline before implementation of the rapid tissue processing and communication system; 171 were included after implementation. Median time to notification following the change was 0 days (interquartile range, 0–1) compared with 1 day (interquartile range, 1–1) before the change (P < 0.001). After the change, same-day notification increased, with 110 (64%) TBBx resulting in same-day notification compared with 0 before (P < 0.001). We initiated treatment of acute cellular rejection on the day of diagnosis for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement initiative resulted in more efficient analysis of TBBx of allografts in lung transplant recipients and faster communication of results to the clinical team. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6494224/ /pubmed/31321363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000146 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions
Hayes, Don
Nicholson, Kerri L.
Miller, Rebecca
Nance, Ashley E.
Kirkby, Stephen E.
Parker, William
Baker, Peter B.
Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title_full Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title_fullStr Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title_short Quality Improvement Initiative for Assessing Allografts after Lung Transplantation
title_sort quality improvement initiative for assessing allografts after lung transplantation
topic Individual QI Projects from Single Institutions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31321363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000146
work_keys_str_mv AT hayesdon qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT nicholsonkerril qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT millerrebecca qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT nanceashleye qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT kirkbystephene qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT parkerwilliam qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation
AT bakerpeterb qualityimprovementinitiativeforassessingallograftsafterlungtransplantation