Cargando…

Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay

The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahman, Mohammad A., Salhotra, Aseem, Månsson, Alf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1
_version_ 1783415272060747776
author Rahman, Mohammad A.
Salhotra, Aseem
Månsson, Alf
author_facet Rahman, Mohammad A.
Salhotra, Aseem
Månsson, Alf
author_sort Rahman, Mohammad A.
collection PubMed
description The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolation process. Here we investigate the effects on motile function of two approaches designed to eliminate the effects of these dead motors. We first tested the removal of heavy meromyosin (HMM) molecules with ATP-insensitive “dead” heads by pelleting them with actin filaments, using ultracentrifugation in the presence of 1 mM MgATP (“affinity purification”). Alternatively we incubated motility assay flow cells, after HMM surface adsorption, with non-fluorescent “blocking actin” (1 µM) to block the dead heads. Both affinity purification and use of blocking actin increased the fraction of motile filaments compared to control conditions. However, affinity purification significantly reduced the actin sliding speed in five out of seven experiments on silanized surfaces and in one out of four experiments on nitrocellulose surfaces. Similar effects on velocity were not observed with the use of blocking actin. However, a reduced speed was also seen (without affinity purification) if HMM or myosin subfragment 1 was mixed with 1 mM MgATP before and during surface adsorption. We conclude that affinity purification can produce unexpected effects that may complicate the interpretation of in vitro motility assays and other experiments with surface adsorbed HMM, e.g. single molecule mechanics experiments. The presence of MgATP during incubation with myosin motor fragments is critical for the complicating effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6494787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64947872019-05-17 Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay Rahman, Mohammad A. Salhotra, Aseem Månsson, Alf J Muscle Res Cell Motil Article The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolation process. Here we investigate the effects on motile function of two approaches designed to eliminate the effects of these dead motors. We first tested the removal of heavy meromyosin (HMM) molecules with ATP-insensitive “dead” heads by pelleting them with actin filaments, using ultracentrifugation in the presence of 1 mM MgATP (“affinity purification”). Alternatively we incubated motility assay flow cells, after HMM surface adsorption, with non-fluorescent “blocking actin” (1 µM) to block the dead heads. Both affinity purification and use of blocking actin increased the fraction of motile filaments compared to control conditions. However, affinity purification significantly reduced the actin sliding speed in five out of seven experiments on silanized surfaces and in one out of four experiments on nitrocellulose surfaces. Similar effects on velocity were not observed with the use of blocking actin. However, a reduced speed was also seen (without affinity purification) if HMM or myosin subfragment 1 was mixed with 1 mM MgATP before and during surface adsorption. We conclude that affinity purification can produce unexpected effects that may complicate the interpretation of in vitro motility assays and other experiments with surface adsorbed HMM, e.g. single molecule mechanics experiments. The presence of MgATP during incubation with myosin motor fragments is critical for the complicating effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6494787/ /pubmed/30850933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Rahman, Mohammad A.
Salhotra, Aseem
Månsson, Alf
Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title_full Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title_short Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
title_sort comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rahmanmohammada comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay
AT salhotraaseem comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay
AT manssonalf comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay