Cargando…
Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay
The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1 |
_version_ | 1783415272060747776 |
---|---|
author | Rahman, Mohammad A. Salhotra, Aseem Månsson, Alf |
author_facet | Rahman, Mohammad A. Salhotra, Aseem Månsson, Alf |
author_sort | Rahman, Mohammad A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolation process. Here we investigate the effects on motile function of two approaches designed to eliminate the effects of these dead motors. We first tested the removal of heavy meromyosin (HMM) molecules with ATP-insensitive “dead” heads by pelleting them with actin filaments, using ultracentrifugation in the presence of 1 mM MgATP (“affinity purification”). Alternatively we incubated motility assay flow cells, after HMM surface adsorption, with non-fluorescent “blocking actin” (1 µM) to block the dead heads. Both affinity purification and use of blocking actin increased the fraction of motile filaments compared to control conditions. However, affinity purification significantly reduced the actin sliding speed in five out of seven experiments on silanized surfaces and in one out of four experiments on nitrocellulose surfaces. Similar effects on velocity were not observed with the use of blocking actin. However, a reduced speed was also seen (without affinity purification) if HMM or myosin subfragment 1 was mixed with 1 mM MgATP before and during surface adsorption. We conclude that affinity purification can produce unexpected effects that may complicate the interpretation of in vitro motility assays and other experiments with surface adsorbed HMM, e.g. single molecule mechanics experiments. The presence of MgATP during incubation with myosin motor fragments is critical for the complicating effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6494787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64947872019-05-17 Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay Rahman, Mohammad A. Salhotra, Aseem Månsson, Alf J Muscle Res Cell Motil Article The in vitro motility assay allows studies of muscle contraction through observation of actin filament propulsion by surface-adsorbed myosin motors or motor fragments isolated from muscle. A possible problem is that motility may be compromised by nonfunctional, “dead”, motors, obtained in the isolation process. Here we investigate the effects on motile function of two approaches designed to eliminate the effects of these dead motors. We first tested the removal of heavy meromyosin (HMM) molecules with ATP-insensitive “dead” heads by pelleting them with actin filaments, using ultracentrifugation in the presence of 1 mM MgATP (“affinity purification”). Alternatively we incubated motility assay flow cells, after HMM surface adsorption, with non-fluorescent “blocking actin” (1 µM) to block the dead heads. Both affinity purification and use of blocking actin increased the fraction of motile filaments compared to control conditions. However, affinity purification significantly reduced the actin sliding speed in five out of seven experiments on silanized surfaces and in one out of four experiments on nitrocellulose surfaces. Similar effects on velocity were not observed with the use of blocking actin. However, a reduced speed was also seen (without affinity purification) if HMM or myosin subfragment 1 was mixed with 1 mM MgATP before and during surface adsorption. We conclude that affinity purification can produce unexpected effects that may complicate the interpretation of in vitro motility assays and other experiments with surface adsorbed HMM, e.g. single molecule mechanics experiments. The presence of MgATP during incubation with myosin motor fragments is critical for the complicating effects. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6494787/ /pubmed/30850933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Rahman, Mohammad A. Salhotra, Aseem Månsson, Alf Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title | Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title_full | Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title_short | Comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
title_sort | comparative analysis of widely used methods to remove nonfunctional myosin heads for the in vitro motility assay |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6494787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10974-019-09505-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rahmanmohammada comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay AT salhotraaseem comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay AT manssonalf comparativeanalysisofwidelyusedmethodstoremovenonfunctionalmyosinheadsfortheinvitromotilityassay |