Cargando…

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests

BACKGROUND: High injury prevalence rates call for effective sports injury prevention strategies, which include the development and application of practical and reliable pre-participatory screening tools. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zumana, Nosipho, Olivier, Benita, Godlwana, Lonwabo, Martin, Candice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061912
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.469
_version_ 1783415319818141696
author Zumana, Nosipho
Olivier, Benita
Godlwana, Lonwabo
Martin, Candice
author_facet Zumana, Nosipho
Olivier, Benita
Godlwana, Lonwabo
Martin, Candice
author_sort Zumana, Nosipho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High injury prevalence rates call for effective sports injury prevention strategies, which include the development and application of practical and reliable pre-participatory screening tools. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the one-legged hyperextension test (1LHET), the empty can (EC) and full can (FC) tests, the standing stork test (SST), the bridge-hold test (BHT) and the 747 balance test (747BT). METHOD: Thirty-five healthy, injury-free male athletes (cricket and soccer players), aged 16–24 years, were evaluated by two physiotherapists. For each of the tests, the participants were evaluated twice (on two consecutive days) by each physiotherapist. Both the intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined. Cohen’s kappa (k) was calculated for the 1LHET, the EC and FC tests and the SST. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the BHT and the 747BT. A confidence level of 95% (p ≤ 0.05) was applied as the criterion for determining the statistical significance of the results. RESULTS: The SST presented with the lowest level of intra-rater agreement (ICC = –0.20 to 0.10). On the other hand, the EC test was the only test where one rater achieved an excellent intersessional agreement (k = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.20). Substantial to excellent results for the inter-rater agreement for both sessions were recorded for the 1LHET (k = 0.70–0.90) and the BHT (ICC = 0.70–0.90). CONCLUSION: Reliability values need to be considered when making clinical decisions based on screening tests. A more refined description of the testing procedures and criteria for interpretation might be necessary before including the six screening tests investigated in this study in formal screening protocols. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Confirmed reliability of screening tests would enable sports professionals to make informed decisions when designing preparticipatory musculoskeletal screening tools and when dealing with the management of injury risks in athletes. KEYWORDS: musculoskeletal screening; injury risk management; intra-rater reliability; inter-rater reliability; soccer; cricket.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6495002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64950022019-05-06 Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests Zumana, Nosipho Olivier, Benita Godlwana, Lonwabo Martin, Candice S Afr J Physiother Original Research BACKGROUND: High injury prevalence rates call for effective sports injury prevention strategies, which include the development and application of practical and reliable pre-participatory screening tools. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the one-legged hyperextension test (1LHET), the empty can (EC) and full can (FC) tests, the standing stork test (SST), the bridge-hold test (BHT) and the 747 balance test (747BT). METHOD: Thirty-five healthy, injury-free male athletes (cricket and soccer players), aged 16–24 years, were evaluated by two physiotherapists. For each of the tests, the participants were evaluated twice (on two consecutive days) by each physiotherapist. Both the intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined. Cohen’s kappa (k) was calculated for the 1LHET, the EC and FC tests and the SST. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the BHT and the 747BT. A confidence level of 95% (p ≤ 0.05) was applied as the criterion for determining the statistical significance of the results. RESULTS: The SST presented with the lowest level of intra-rater agreement (ICC = –0.20 to 0.10). On the other hand, the EC test was the only test where one rater achieved an excellent intersessional agreement (k = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40–1.20). Substantial to excellent results for the inter-rater agreement for both sessions were recorded for the 1LHET (k = 0.70–0.90) and the BHT (ICC = 0.70–0.90). CONCLUSION: Reliability values need to be considered when making clinical decisions based on screening tests. A more refined description of the testing procedures and criteria for interpretation might be necessary before including the six screening tests investigated in this study in formal screening protocols. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Confirmed reliability of screening tests would enable sports professionals to make informed decisions when designing preparticipatory musculoskeletal screening tools and when dealing with the management of injury risks in athletes. KEYWORDS: musculoskeletal screening; injury risk management; intra-rater reliability; inter-rater reliability; soccer; cricket. AOSIS 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6495002/ /pubmed/31061912 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.469 Text en © 2019. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zumana, Nosipho
Olivier, Benita
Godlwana, Lonwabo
Martin, Candice
Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title_full Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title_fullStr Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title_full_unstemmed Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title_short Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
title_sort intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of six musculoskeletal preparticipatory screening tests
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31061912
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v75i1.469
work_keys_str_mv AT zumananosipho intraraterandinterraterreliabilityofsixmusculoskeletalpreparticipatoryscreeningtests
AT olivierbenita intraraterandinterraterreliabilityofsixmusculoskeletalpreparticipatoryscreeningtests
AT godlwanalonwabo intraraterandinterraterreliabilityofsixmusculoskeletalpreparticipatoryscreeningtests
AT martincandice intraraterandinterraterreliabilityofsixmusculoskeletalpreparticipatoryscreeningtests