Cargando…
How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature
Background: Physical Examination (PE) skills are vital for patient care, and many medical students receive their first introduction to them in their pre-clinical years. A substantial amount of curriculum time is devoted to teaching these skills in most schools. Little is known about the best way to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1608142 |
_version_ | 1783415336873230336 |
---|---|
author | Danielson, Aaron R. Venugopal, Sandhya Mefford, Jason M. Clarke, Samuel O. |
author_facet | Danielson, Aaron R. Venugopal, Sandhya Mefford, Jason M. Clarke, Samuel O. |
author_sort | Danielson, Aaron R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Physical Examination (PE) skills are vital for patient care, and many medical students receive their first introduction to them in their pre-clinical years. A substantial amount of curriculum time is devoted to teaching these skills in most schools. Little is known about the best way to introduce PE skills to novice learners. Objective: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of how medical students are first taught PE skills and the evidence supporting these strategies. Design: We searched ERIC, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE for descriptions of complete PE curricula for novice learners. Inclusion criteria were: (1) English language; (2) subjects were enrolled in medical school and were in the preclinical portion of their training; (3) description of a method to teach physical examination skills for the first time; (4) description of the study population; (5) Description of a complete PE curriculum. We used the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score to evaluate the quality of evidence provided. Results: Our search returned 5,418 articles; 32 articles met our inclusion criteria. Two main types of curricula were reported: comprehensive ‘head-to-toe’ PE curricula (18%) and organ system-based curricula (41%). No studies compared these directly, and only two evaluated trainees’ clinical performance. The rest of the articles described interventions used across curricula (41%). Median MERSQI score was 10.1 Interquartile range 8.1–12.4. We found evidence for the use of non-faculty teaching associates, technology-enhanced PE education, and the addition of clinical exposure to formal PE teaching. Conclusions: The current literature on teaching PE is focused on describing innovations to head-to-toe and organ system-based curricula rather than their relative effectiveness, and is further limited by its reliance on short-term outcomes. The optimal strategy for novice PE instruction remains unknown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6495115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64951152019-05-09 How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature Danielson, Aaron R. Venugopal, Sandhya Mefford, Jason M. Clarke, Samuel O. Med Educ Online Research Article Background: Physical Examination (PE) skills are vital for patient care, and many medical students receive their first introduction to them in their pre-clinical years. A substantial amount of curriculum time is devoted to teaching these skills in most schools. Little is known about the best way to introduce PE skills to novice learners. Objective: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review of how medical students are first taught PE skills and the evidence supporting these strategies. Design: We searched ERIC, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE for descriptions of complete PE curricula for novice learners. Inclusion criteria were: (1) English language; (2) subjects were enrolled in medical school and were in the preclinical portion of their training; (3) description of a method to teach physical examination skills for the first time; (4) description of the study population; (5) Description of a complete PE curriculum. We used the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score to evaluate the quality of evidence provided. Results: Our search returned 5,418 articles; 32 articles met our inclusion criteria. Two main types of curricula were reported: comprehensive ‘head-to-toe’ PE curricula (18%) and organ system-based curricula (41%). No studies compared these directly, and only two evaluated trainees’ clinical performance. The rest of the articles described interventions used across curricula (41%). Median MERSQI score was 10.1 Interquartile range 8.1–12.4. We found evidence for the use of non-faculty teaching associates, technology-enhanced PE education, and the addition of clinical exposure to formal PE teaching. Conclusions: The current literature on teaching PE is focused on describing innovations to head-to-toe and organ system-based curricula rather than their relative effectiveness, and is further limited by its reliance on short-term outcomes. The optimal strategy for novice PE instruction remains unknown. Taylor & Francis 2019-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6495115/ /pubmed/31032719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1608142 Text en © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Danielson, Aaron R. Venugopal, Sandhya Mefford, Jason M. Clarke, Samuel O. How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title | How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title_full | How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title_fullStr | How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title_short | How do novices learn physical examination skills? A systematic review of the literature |
title_sort | how do novices learn physical examination skills? a systematic review of the literature |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31032719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1608142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielsonaaronr howdonoviceslearnphysicalexaminationskillsasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT venugopalsandhya howdonoviceslearnphysicalexaminationskillsasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT meffordjasonm howdonoviceslearnphysicalexaminationskillsasystematicreviewoftheliterature AT clarkesamuelo howdonoviceslearnphysicalexaminationskillsasystematicreviewoftheliterature |