Cargando…
Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the exten...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998223 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024 |
_version_ | 1783415342694924288 |
---|---|
author | Weijs, Cynthia Coe, Jason Desmarais, Serge Majowicz, Shannon Jones-Bitton, Andria |
author_facet | Weijs, Cynthia Coe, Jason Desmarais, Serge Majowicz, Shannon Jones-Bitton, Andria |
author_sort | Weijs, Cynthia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the extent to which workday comments posted to health professionals’ personal Facebook profiles influence their credibility and affect the professional-client relationship. METHODS: In a controlled field study, participants (members of the public) reviewed randomly assigned mock Facebook profiles of health professionals. The 2×2×2 factorial design of mock profiles included gender (female/male), health profession (physician/veterinarian), and workday comment type (evident frustration/ambiguous). Participants then rated the profile owner’s credibility on a visual analog scale. An analysis of variance test compared ratings. Mediation analyses tested the importance of credibility ratings on participants’ willingness to become a client of the mock health professional. RESULTS: Participants (N=357) rated health professionals whose personal Facebook profile showed a comment with evident frustration rather than an ambiguous workday comment as less credible (P<.001; mean difference 11.18 [SE 1.28]; 95% CI 8.66 to 13.70). Furthermore, participants indicated they were less likely to become clients of the former when they considered credibility (standardized beta=.69; P<.001). Credibility explained 86% of the variation in the relationship between the type of workday comment and the participant’s willingness to become a client of the health professional. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of the impact of health professionals’ personal online disclosures on credibility and the health relationship. Public perceptions about professionalism and credibility are integral to developing the evidence base for e-professionalism guidelines and encouraging best practices in social media use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6495291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64952912019-05-17 Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada Weijs, Cynthia Coe, Jason Desmarais, Serge Majowicz, Shannon Jones-Bitton, Andria J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the extent to which workday comments posted to health professionals’ personal Facebook profiles influence their credibility and affect the professional-client relationship. METHODS: In a controlled field study, participants (members of the public) reviewed randomly assigned mock Facebook profiles of health professionals. The 2×2×2 factorial design of mock profiles included gender (female/male), health profession (physician/veterinarian), and workday comment type (evident frustration/ambiguous). Participants then rated the profile owner’s credibility on a visual analog scale. An analysis of variance test compared ratings. Mediation analyses tested the importance of credibility ratings on participants’ willingness to become a client of the mock health professional. RESULTS: Participants (N=357) rated health professionals whose personal Facebook profile showed a comment with evident frustration rather than an ambiguous workday comment as less credible (P<.001; mean difference 11.18 [SE 1.28]; 95% CI 8.66 to 13.70). Furthermore, participants indicated they were less likely to become clients of the former when they considered credibility (standardized beta=.69; P<.001). Credibility explained 86% of the variation in the relationship between the type of workday comment and the participant’s willingness to become a client of the health professional. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of the impact of health professionals’ personal online disclosures on credibility and the health relationship. Public perceptions about professionalism and credibility are integral to developing the evidence base for e-professionalism guidelines and encouraging best practices in social media use. JMIR Publications 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6495291/ /pubmed/30998223 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024 Text en ©Cynthia Weijs, Jason Coe, Serge Desmarais, Shannon Majowicz, Andria Jones-Bitton. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.04.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Weijs, Cynthia Coe, Jason Desmarais, Serge Majowicz, Shannon Jones-Bitton, Andria Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title | Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title_full | Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title_fullStr | Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title_short | Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada |
title_sort | effects of mock facebook workday comments on public perception of professional credibility: a field study in canada |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998223 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weijscynthia effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada AT coejason effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada AT desmaraisserge effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada AT majowiczshannon effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada AT jonesbittonandria effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada |