Cargando…

Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada

BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the exten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weijs, Cynthia, Coe, Jason, Desmarais, Serge, Majowicz, Shannon, Jones-Bitton, Andria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998223
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024
_version_ 1783415342694924288
author Weijs, Cynthia
Coe, Jason
Desmarais, Serge
Majowicz, Shannon
Jones-Bitton, Andria
author_facet Weijs, Cynthia
Coe, Jason
Desmarais, Serge
Majowicz, Shannon
Jones-Bitton, Andria
author_sort Weijs, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the extent to which workday comments posted to health professionals’ personal Facebook profiles influence their credibility and affect the professional-client relationship. METHODS: In a controlled field study, participants (members of the public) reviewed randomly assigned mock Facebook profiles of health professionals. The 2×2×2 factorial design of mock profiles included gender (female/male), health profession (physician/veterinarian), and workday comment type (evident frustration/ambiguous). Participants then rated the profile owner’s credibility on a visual analog scale. An analysis of variance test compared ratings. Mediation analyses tested the importance of credibility ratings on participants’ willingness to become a client of the mock health professional. RESULTS: Participants (N=357) rated health professionals whose personal Facebook profile showed a comment with evident frustration rather than an ambiguous workday comment as less credible (P<.001; mean difference 11.18 [SE 1.28]; 95% CI 8.66 to 13.70). Furthermore, participants indicated they were less likely to become clients of the former when they considered credibility (standardized beta=.69; P<.001). Credibility explained 86% of the variation in the relationship between the type of workday comment and the participant’s willingness to become a client of the health professional. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of the impact of health professionals’ personal online disclosures on credibility and the health relationship. Public perceptions about professionalism and credibility are integral to developing the evidence base for e-professionalism guidelines and encouraging best practices in social media use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6495291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64952912019-05-17 Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada Weijs, Cynthia Coe, Jason Desmarais, Serge Majowicz, Shannon Jones-Bitton, Andria J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is considerable discussion of risks to health professionals’ reputations and employment from personal social media use, though its impacts on professional credibility and the health professional-client relationship are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the extent to which workday comments posted to health professionals’ personal Facebook profiles influence their credibility and affect the professional-client relationship. METHODS: In a controlled field study, participants (members of the public) reviewed randomly assigned mock Facebook profiles of health professionals. The 2×2×2 factorial design of mock profiles included gender (female/male), health profession (physician/veterinarian), and workday comment type (evident frustration/ambiguous). Participants then rated the profile owner’s credibility on a visual analog scale. An analysis of variance test compared ratings. Mediation analyses tested the importance of credibility ratings on participants’ willingness to become a client of the mock health professional. RESULTS: Participants (N=357) rated health professionals whose personal Facebook profile showed a comment with evident frustration rather than an ambiguous workday comment as less credible (P<.001; mean difference 11.18 [SE 1.28]; 95% CI 8.66 to 13.70). Furthermore, participants indicated they were less likely to become clients of the former when they considered credibility (standardized beta=.69; P<.001). Credibility explained 86% of the variation in the relationship between the type of workday comment and the participant’s willingness to become a client of the health professional. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence of the impact of health professionals’ personal online disclosures on credibility and the health relationship. Public perceptions about professionalism and credibility are integral to developing the evidence base for e-professionalism guidelines and encouraging best practices in social media use. JMIR Publications 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6495291/ /pubmed/30998223 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024 Text en ©Cynthia Weijs, Jason Coe, Serge Desmarais, Shannon Majowicz, Andria Jones-Bitton. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.04.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Weijs, Cynthia
Coe, Jason
Desmarais, Serge
Majowicz, Shannon
Jones-Bitton, Andria
Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title_full Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title_fullStr Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title_short Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada
title_sort effects of mock facebook workday comments on public perception of professional credibility: a field study in canada
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6495291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998223
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12024
work_keys_str_mv AT weijscynthia effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada
AT coejason effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada
AT desmaraisserge effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada
AT majowiczshannon effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada
AT jonesbittonandria effectsofmockfacebookworkdaycommentsonpublicperceptionofprofessionalcredibilityafieldstudyincanada